Analisis Komparatif Algoritma Naïve Bayes dan XGBoost untuk Mengklasifikasikan Performa Akademik Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Tingkat Ketergantungan AI

Authors

  • Aryanti Aryanti Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8815-5997
  • Juriawan Raja Saputra Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Taufik Permana Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Putri Nabila Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Ibnu Asrafi Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/arcitech.v6i1.17321

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Classification, Naïve Bayes, XGBoost

Abstract

While Artificial Intelligence (AI) integrates into higher education to streamline information retrieval, comprehension, and academic task completion, over-reliance on these tools may jeopardize student outcomes. Extant literature predominantly examines AI adoption rates, dependency levels, and user sentiments; however, comparative analyses of machine learning models for classifying academic performance relative to AI usage intensity remain scarce. To address this gap, this study evaluates and compares the efficacy of Naïve Bayes and XGBoost algorithms in predicting student performance based on their AI engagement. Utilizing the Academic Outcomes & AI Dependency Analysis Dataset—comprising 8,000 instances and 26 features—the methodology encompasses data preprocessing, normalization, partitioning, model training, and evaluation via accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The empirical results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms Naïve Bayes, achieving a superior accuracy of 84.17% compared to 79.03%. Consequently, XGBoost proves to be a more robust model for classifying academic performance driven by AI usage, offering valuable insights for the advancement of educational data analytics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antonius, J., Siallagan, S., Aurelia, T., Yuya, P., & Arshyara, S. (2025). Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan AI Mengakibatkan Krisis Pemikiran Kritis Pelajar dalam Dunia Pendidikan Indonesia. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(2018), 47679–47683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.37423

Arief, M. (2021). Perbandingan Support Vector Machine dan Modified Balanced Random Forest dalam Deteksi Pasien Penyakit Diabetes. JURNAL RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 1(10), 393–399. https://teknosi.fti.unand.ac.id/index.php/teknosi/article/view/1555

Ariyani, V., Putri, P., Budi, A., & Eridani, D. (2022). PERBANDINGAN KINERJA ALGORITME NAÏVE BAYES DAN K- NEAREST NEIGHBOR ( KNN ) UNTUK PREDIKSI HARGA RUMAH. JURNAL ILMIAH TEKNIK ELEKTRO, 4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/transmisi.24.4.162-171

Aulia, G. (2026). The Impact of ChatGPT on Students ’ Academic Performance Using the Support Vector Machine Algorithm Pengaruh ChatGPT Terhadap Peforma Akademik Mahasiswa Menggunakan Algoritma Support Vector Machine. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine learning and Computer Science, 6(April), 619–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v6i2.2630

Azis, A. R. (2024). Analisis Komparasi Algoritma Machine learning dalam Prediksi Performa Akademik Mahasiswa : Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika (JIKI), 4(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54082/jiki.212

Baidoo-anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial ntelligence ( AI ): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI Volume:, 7(December), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500

Bayu, M., Alfarizi, A., Witanti, W., & Komarudin, A. (2025). Prediksi Kinerja Akademik Siswa Bimbingan Belajar Menggunakan Algoritma Extreme Gradient Boosting ( XGBoost ). Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 7(1), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v7i1.7387

Das, S., & Eliseev, A. (2025). Predicting ChatGPT Use in Assignments : Implications for AI-Aware Assessment Design. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2508.12013., 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.12013

Endraswari, P. M., Tou, N., & Zaliman, I. (2025). ANALISIS KETERGANTUNGAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP CHATGPT DALAM KONTEKS AKADEMIK : PEMODELAN KLASIFIKASI BERBASIS NAÏVE BAYES. Jurnal Informasi Interaktif Vol., 10(3), 199–208. https://informasiinteraktif.janabadra.ac.id/index.php/jii/article/view/192

Hakim, M. F. (2025). Analisis Ketergantungan Mahasiswa Universitas Merangin terhadap ChatGPT dengan Machine learning. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Teknik Komputer Dan Teknologi Pendidikan (JUSTIKPEN), 7924(September), 35–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55338/justikpen.v5i1.201

Hamka, J. P., Barat, A. T., Utara, K. P., Padang, K., & Barat, S. (2025). Dampak AI terhadap Proses Pembelajaran Mahasiswa Prodi Perpustakaan dan Ilmu Informasi UNP. Jurnal Pustaka AI (Pusat Akses Kajian Teknologi Artificial Intelligence), 5(1), 89–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55382/jurnalpustakaai.v5i1.950

Monalisa, S., Kurniawan, M. R., Sena, A. B., Purwani, F., Studi, P., Informasi, S., Islam, U., Raden, N., Palembang, F., & Akademik, P. (2025). PENERAPAN MODEL UTAUT UNTUK MENGUKUR DAMPAK KECERDASAN BUATAN TERHADAP AKADEMIK MAHASISWA. Jurnal Mahasiswa Sistem Informasi (JMSI), 7(1), 373–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/jmsi.v7i1.10747

Prasojo, B., & Haryatmi, E. (2021). Analisa Prediksi Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit Pinjaman dengan Metode Random Forest. J. Nas. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf, 02, 79–89. https://teknosi.fti.unand.ac.id/index.php/teknosi/article/view/1555

Putri, D. D., Nama, G. F., & Sulistiono, W. E. (2022). ANALISIS SENTIMEN KINERJA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT ( DPR ) PADA TWITTER MENGGUNAKAN METODE NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFIER. Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknik Elektro Terapan (JITET), 10(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23960/jitet.v10i1.2262

Ramadhan, H. S., Akbar, A. S., Sinaga, K. Y., Muthoharoh, L., Satria, A., & Manullang, M. C. (2026). SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF AI ADOPTION IN INDONESIAN HIGHER EDUCATION USING MACHINE LEARNING AND TRANSFORMER-BASED MODELS. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2604.27439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.27439

Sholekhah, F., Putri, A. D., & Efrizoni, L. (2024). Comparison of Naive Bayes and K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithms for Metabolic Syndrome Classification. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine learning and Computer Science, 4(April), 507–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v4i2.1249

Solang, E. W., & Adu, F. X. (2026). Machine learning Evaluation for Hotel Cancellation Prediction with Threshold Adjustment and Cost-Based Evaluation. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine learning and Computer Science, 6(January), 193–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v6i1.2466

Suryanegara, G. A. B., & Purbolaksono, M. D. (2021). Peningkatan Hasil Klasifikasi pada Algoritma Random Forest untuk Deteksi Pasien Penderita Diabetes Menggunakan Metode Normalisasi. JURNAL RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 1(10), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v5i1.2880

Wang, J., & Yu, Y. (2025). Machine learning approach to student performance prediction of online learning. PloS One, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299018

Z, I. A., Widaningrum, I., & Litanianda, Y. (2025). Pengembangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Machine learning untuk Prediksi Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Data Historis Evaluasi Pembelajaran. JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer), 12(6), 1026–1035. https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v12i6.9363

Zamri, D. (2022). Comparison of Data Mining Methods for Predition of Floods with Naïve Bayes and KNN Algorithm. SENTIMAS: Seminar Nasional Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 40–48. https://journal.irpi.or.id/index.php/sentimas/article/view/353

Downloads

Published

27-06-2026

How to Cite

Aryanti, A., Saputra, J. R., Permana, T., Nabila, P., & Asrafi, I. (2026). Analisis Komparatif Algoritma Naïve Bayes dan XGBoost untuk Mengklasifikasikan Performa Akademik Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Tingkat Ketergantungan AI. Arcitech: Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 6(1), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.29240/arcitech.v6i1.17321

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check