The Impact of Social Media Visibility Toward Institutional Ownership and Individual Ownership on Indonesia Sharia Stocks Using Instagram Platform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/alfalah.v8i1.6687Keywords:
Visibility, Ownership, Stocks, Instagram, PlatformAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine the effect of Instagram user’s response to corporate Instagram post (likes and comments) toward individual ownership and institutional ownership of sharia stocks in Indonesia.
Design/Method/Approach: The data collection method used is purposive sampling technique. The number of samples in this study were 158 companies registered in ISSI (Indonesia Sharia Stock Index) and having an active Instagram account. Data processing using SPSS.26 with Ordinary Least Square (OLS).
Findings: The results showed that Instagram user respond increasing the institutional investor and individual investor in sharia stock. The interpretation for this findings that such Instagram activities increase the visibility of the company across a more diverse group of investors. This increase visibility makes information more accessible to individual and institutional investors, so that they are attracted to invest more in sharia stock.
Origianalily/Value: This research is the first study that used social media to measure Sharia Stock Ownership.Downloads
References
Baron & Holmstrom. “The Investment Banking Contract for New Issues Under Asymetric Information†(1979).
Bartov, Eli, and Leonard N Stern. “Can Twitter Help Predict Firm-Level Earnings and Stock Returns ? Can Twitter Help Predict Firm-Level Earnings and Stock Returns ?†(2017).
Blankespoor, Elizabeth, Gregory S. Miller, and Hal D. White. “Dissemination, Direct-Access Information Technology and Information Asymmetry.†SSRN Electronic Journal, no. March (2012).
Bushee, Brian J, and Gregory S Miller. “Investor Relations, Firm Visibility, and Investor Following†87, no. 3 (2012): 867–897.
Chen, Hailiang, Prabuddha De, Yu Hu, and Byoung Hyoun Hwang. “Wisdom of Crowds: The Value of Stock Opinions Transmitted through Social Media.†Review of Financial Studies 27, no. 5 (2014): 1367–1403.
Curtis, Asher, and Vernon J Richardson. “Investor Attention and the Pricing of Earnings News †,†no. 206 (2014).
Derigs, Ulrich, and Shehab Marzban. “New Strategies and a New Paradigm for Shariah-Compliant Portfolio Optimization.†Journal of Banking and Finance 33, no. 6 (2009): 1166–1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.12.011.
Frieder, Laura, and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam. “Brand Perceptions and the Market for Common Stock Abstract Brand Perceptions and the Market for Common Stock†(2003).
Grullon, Gustavo. “Advertising , Breadth of Ownership , and Liquidity by And,†no. February 2004 (2014).
Grullon, Gustavo, George Kanatas, and James P. Weston. “Advertising, Breadth of Ownership, and Liquidity.†Review of Financial Studies 17, no. 2 (2004): 439–461.
Hasan, Rajib, and Weiwei Wang. “Social Media Visibility, Investor Diversity and Trading Consensus.†International Journal of Managerial Finance 17, no. 1 (2020): 25–48.
———. “Social Network Activities , Future Earnings , and Equity Values†17, no. 1 (2017): 58–72.
Jung, Michael J., James P. Naughton, Ahmed Tahoun, and Clare Wang. “Do Firms Strategically Disseminate? Evidence from Corporate Use of Social Media.†Accounting Review 93, no. 4 (2018): 225–252.
Keloharju, Matti, Samuli Knüpfer, and Juhani T. Linnainmaa. “Do Investors Buy What They Know? Product Market Choices and Investment Decisions.†SSRN Electronic Journal, no. 10 (2012).
Lian Fen Lee,∗ Amy P. Hutton, and Susan S Hu. “The Role of Social Media in the Capital Market : Evidence from Consumer Product Recalls.†Journal of Accounting Research 53, no. 2 (2015): 367–404.
Malkiel, Burton G. “The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics.†Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, no. 1 (2003): 59–82.
Nofsinger, John R, and John R Nofsinger. “Social Mood and Financial Economics Social Mood and Financial Economics.†Journal of Behavioral Finance 6, no. May 2013 (2010): 37–41.
This work is licensed under a 