Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Umpan Balik Korektif Tertulis dalam Asesmen Formatif Menulis Esai di Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/estetik.v9i1.14145Keywords:
asesmen formatif, menulis esai, umpan balik korektif tertulisAbstract
Umpan balik korektif tertulis dalam pembelajaran bahasa telah menunjukkan efektivitasnya dalam meningkatkan kinerja menulis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persepsi mahasiswa Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri tentang umpan balik korektif tertulis pada asesmen formatif menulis esai. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode mixed methode dengan jenis sekuensial eksplanatori (kuantitatif-kualitatif).Sebanyak 82 mahasiswa berpartisipasi pada penelitian ini. Instrumen pengumpulan data kuantitatif berupa angket dikotomis, sedangkan untuk memperoleh data kualitatif dilakukan wawancara semi terstruktur. Data kuantitatif dianalisis dengan analisis binomial dengan H0 : p=0,5, dan Ha : p>0,5. Data kualitatif dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik. Berdasarkan analisis data diketahui bahwa, respon mahasiswa terhadap umpan balik korektif tertulis adalah 0,57 sehingga p>0,5 dengan demikian dapat diartikan bahwa mahasiswa memberikan persepsi terhadap umpan balik korektif tertulis. Kendati mahasiswa lebih memercayai umpan balik yang diberikan dosen dibandingkan dari teman sejawat, umpan balik korektif tertulis memiliki peran besar dalam meningkatkan motivasi, menunjukan kesalahan, dan meningkatkan keterampilan menulis mahasiswa.
Downloads
References
Admiraal, W., Vermeulen, J., & Bulterman-Bos, J. (2020). Teaching with learning analytics: How to connect computer-based assessment data with classroom instruction? Technology. Pedagogy and Education, 29(5), 577–591.
Askiyanto, M., & Kamhar, M. Y. (2022). Efektivitas kebijakan sekolah terhadap kinerja dosen SMP PGRI 01 Karangploso masa pandemi Covid-19. Referensi Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 9(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.33366/ref.v9i2.2988
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ090202 7
Cahyani, N. W., Mardani, D. M. S., & Hermawan, G. S. (2019). Penguatan (reinforcement) verbal dan nonverbal dosen dalam pembelajaran bahasa jepang di kelas XI MIPA 2 SMA Negeri Bali Mandara. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang Undiksha, 5(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbj.v5i2.18566
Chong, S. W. (2018). Three Paradigms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for WF Research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 330–347.
Clarke, J. L., & Boud, D. (2018). Refocusing portfolio assessment: Curating for feedback and portrayal. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 479–486.
Crosswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Desyandri, D. (2018). Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal untuk Menumbuhkembangkan Literasi Budaya di Sekolah Dasar. Sekolah Dasar Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan, 27(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v27i12018p001
Farrokhi, F., & Sattarpour, S. (2011). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(12), 1797–1803. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.12.1797-1803
Firdiansyah, F. (2022). Kesulitan-Kesulitan Mahasiswa dalam Memahami Novel Inggris: Suatu Kajian. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(1), 591. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i1.790
Fitriani, N., & Citriadin, Y. (2020). Pengaruh pendekatan scientific dan penilaian authentic terhadap peningkatan kemampuan bahasa inggris sma di jawa timur. Fitrah Jurnal Studi Pendidikan, 11(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.47625/fitrah.v11i2.280
Harahap, H. H. Y., Samakmur, S., & Nurbaiti, N. (2023). Peningkatan hasil belajar mahasiswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran think pair share (tps) pada materi tema 1 sub tema 3 di kelas III SD Negeri 101350 Purbatua. Jurnal Jipdas (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 446. https://doi.org/10.37081/jipdas.v3i2.1201
Mardison, S., & Yonalisa, R. F. (2020). The implementation of peer counseling to solve the students problem (p. 138). https://doi.org/10.32698/icftk414
Nakamura, S. (2018). Insights from Studies on Written Corrective Feedback: Implications for Language Pedagogy. REFLections, 22, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v22i0.112330
Nauvalia, C. (2021). Faktor eksternal yang mempengaruhi academic self-efficacy: Sebuah tinjauan literatur. Cognicia, 9(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v9i1.14138
Salmudin, S.-, Umar, M. N., & Jamali, Y. (2023). Pembinaan Karakter Toleransi Mahasiswa SMP Negeri 1 Sultan Daulat. Tadabbur Jurnal Peradaban Islam, 5(1), 712. https://doi.org/10.22373/tadabbur.v5i1.350
Sari, N. I., & Ahmad, F. (2022). Effectiveness of Jigsaw Type II Cooperative Learning Model in Improving Self-Efficacy, Activities, and Learning Outcomes of STKIP Pembangunan Indonesia Makassar Students. ARRUS Journal of Mathematics and Applied Science, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.35877/mathscience714
Selviana, R., Sukarelawati, S., & Luthfie, H. M. (2023). Efektivitas komunikasi interpersonal antar mahasiswa dalam membangun motivasi penyelesaian tugas akhir. Karimah Tauhid, 2(5), 1794. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v2i5.10214
Simatupang, E. P. C., & Widjaja, Y. (2021). Hubungan persepsi mahasiswa tentang lingkungan pembelajaran dengan kejadian burnout di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Tarumanagara tahap akademik. Tarumanagara Medical Journal, 3(2), 291. https://doi.org/10.24912/tmj.v4i1.13720
Sitepu, J. M., Nasution, M., & Masitah, W. (2021). The Development of Islamic Big Book Learning Media For Early Children’s Languages. Nazhruna Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(3), 735. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v4i3.1691
Usman, R. (2015). Penggunaan Metode Parafrase untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Parafrase Puisi ke Prosa terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Kelas II SMP Al-Ittihat Pekanbaru. SOROT, 10(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.31258/sorot.10.2.3213
Wondim, B. M., Bishaw, K. S., & Zeleke, Y. T. (2024). Effectiveness of teachers’ direct and indirect written corrective feedback provision strategies on enhancing students’ writing achievement: Ethiopian university entrants in focus. Heliyon, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24279
Zabihi, R., & Pordel, M. (2011). An Investigation of Critical Reading in Reading Textbooks: A Qualitative Analysis. International Education Studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n3p80
Zhang, X., & Zhang, R. (2023). Feedback, Response, and Learner Development: A Sociocultural Approach to Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231157680
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Giati Anisah, Sumarwati Sumarwati; Budhi Setiawan; Raheni Suhita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with ESTETIK : Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
