Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pemakai Dengan Model CIPP di Perpustakaan Fakultas Teknik UGM
Open Access
Published:
2019-05-28
Pages:
37-66
Section:
Articles
Abstract
The optimal use of libraries is through user education, because through this program users get a series of knowledge about information sources. One way to find out the success of a program is to do an assessment. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of user education that has been implemented in the Library of the Faculty of Engineering UGM. CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process & Product) used for evalution with a qualitative approach. Research subjects were members of the UGM Faculty of Engineering who had attended user education programs and library management team. Data collection is done with documentation, interviews, and observations. The results showed (1) the Context evaluation was good, there was a match between the program with the vision and mission of the institution, (2) Evaluation of inputs was good, supporting facilities and facilities were adequate, (3) Process evaluation was sufficient, the implementation schedule needed to be improved, ( 4) Evaluation of the product is good, there is a certificate as a sign of following the activity by achieving the competency that has been set. The factors that support the implementation of the program are competency of human resources, communication, adequate facilities and infrastructure, and good cooperation with stakeholders. The factors that hinder the program are the schedule of activities that are not yet routine, those responsible for the program cannot be delegated to other people, there is no analysis of student needs, and there is no written policy on this program. The recommendation of this research is that it is necessary to improve several inhibiting factors so that the implementation of user education activities can run smoothly in accordance with the stated goals.
Keywords
User Education
CIPP
Evaluation
Library
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
- Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1993. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Perkasa.
- Australian Library Association. 2012. The Role Of Libraries and Library Adn Information Profesionals. Australian Library and Informastion Association. https://www.alia.org.au/information-and-resources/about-sector.
- Chen, Kuan?nien, and Pei?chun Lin. 2011. Information Literacy in University Library User Education. Aslib Proceedings 63(4): 399–418. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/00012531111148967
- Downard, Karen. 1992. User Education in Academic Libraries. Library Management 13(3). http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.ugm.ac.id/docview/198855982?accountid=13771.
- Al Hamidy, Yusuf Dzul Ikram, and Heriyanto Heriyanto. 2012. Kemampuan Literasi Informasi Mahasiswa Pada Layanan American Corner Di UPT Perpustakaan IAIN Walisongo Semarang Menurut Association of College and Research Libraries. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan 1(1): 1–9.
- Harker, Emily. 2009. Learning about Learning. Health Information & Libraries Journal 26(2): 156–60.
- Harsono. 2008. Student Center Learning Di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran dan Profesi Kesehatan Indonesia 3(1): 4–8.
- Klain-Gabbay, Liat, and Snunith Shoham. 2016. Scholarly Communication and Academic Librarians. Library & Information Science Research 38(2): 170–79.
- Lewin, Heather S., and Sarah M. Passonneau. 2012. An Analysis of Academic Research Libraries Assessment Data: A Look at Professional Models and Benchmarking Data. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 38(2): 85–93. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0099133312000171 (September 10, 2014).
- Sarjono. 2013. Efektivitas Pendidikan Pemakai Di Universitas Gadjah Mada. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi 9(12): 1–7.
- Sugiyono. 2008. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
- Tawaf, Muhammad. 2007. Pendidikan Pemakai (User Education) Dan Pemanfaatan Perpusakaan (Studi Kasus Di Perpustakaan UIN Suska Riay.” Anida (43): 72–96.
76
Abstract views
171
Downloads