Back to article list Issue: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023)

Pilot Study on User Experience Analysis of Universitas Indonesia Library Website

Open Access
Published: 2023-06-30
Pages: 105-116
Section: Article
https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v7i1.6453
PDF Copyright

Abstract

User experience is an essential component in website development where information architecture needs to be considered. Information architecture can help make it easier for users to find what they are looking for and need on a website. In providing the information needed by users, Universitas Indonesia (UI) Library needs to analyse the relationship between user experience and user perceptions of information architecture. This research uses the Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX), Standardized User Experience Percentile Rank Questionnaire (SUPR-Q), and Library Search UX instruments and received responses from 127 UI students. The results showed that library search, system capability, website navigation, trust, loyalty, and user interface significantly affect user perceptions of the information architecture of the Universitas Indonesia Library website. Additionally, information quality, interface quality, and system quality do not significantly affect user perceptions of the information architecture of the Universitas Indonesia Library website. This research is useful for further development of the UI Library website.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


References

  1. Abdillah, W., & Hartono, J. (2015). Partial Least Square (PLS): alternatif structural equation modeling (SEM) dalam penelitian bisnis (Vol. 22). Penerbit Andi.
  2. Alshaheen, R., & Tang, R. (2022). User Experience and Information Architecture of Selected National Library Websites: A Comparative Content Inventory, Heuristic Evaluation, and Usability Investigation. Journal of Web Librarianship, 16(1), 31–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2022.2027318
  3. Andrews, K. (2022). Information Architecture and Web Usability. Https://Courses.Isds.Tugraz.at/Iaweb/Iaweb.Pdf .
  4. Chatterjee, S., & Kar, A. K. (2018). Effects of successful adoption of information technology enabled services in proposed smart cities of India. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(2), 189–209.
  5. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2017-0008
  6. Dandy, M. H., & Mayesti, N. (2021). Analisis Arsitektur Informasi Situs Web Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia.
  7. Douven, I. (2018). A Bayesian perspective on Likert scales and central tendency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 1203–1211.
  8. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1344-2
  9. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Square (Konsep, Tehnik, dan Aplikasi) menggunakan program SmartPLS 3.0. Universitas Diponegoro.
  10. Hidayat, F. R. (2017). Pengalaman Pengguna Terhadap Situs Web Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia.
  11. K, A. (2021). Creating and Improving the Design of the Library Website and the Opac Online Public Access List Using Zoho. Com Sites and Awesometable. Com: A Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4183333
  12. Ratnasari. W. (2013). Analisis Arsitektur Informasi Perpustakaan Digital Universitas Terbuka. Universitas Indonesia.
  13. Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., & Arango, J. (2015). Information Architecture For the Web and Beyond (4th ed.). O’Reilly Media.
  14. Salasa, S., Murni, T. W., & Emaliyawati, E. (2017). Pemberdayaan pada Kelompok Remaja melalui Pendekatan Contingency Planning dalam Meningkatkan Kesiapsiagaan terhadap Ancaman Kematian Akibat Bencana. Jurnal Pendidikan Keperawatan Indonesia, 3(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpki.v3i2.9421
  15. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann.
  16. Stevenson, L., & Larose K. (2016). Library Search UX Survey Result.
  17. Triasih, H. (2021). Analisis Faktor yang Memengaruhi Deposit Data Penelitian Pada Repositori Data Institusi Menggunakan Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) di LIPI dan Balitbangkes. Universitas Indonesia.
  18. Utami, J. M. (2017). Evaluasi Arsitektur Informasi Situs Indonesia Heritage Library. Universitas Indonesia.
  19. Zarour, M., & Alharbi, M. (2017). User experience framework that combines aspects, dimensions, and measurement methods. Cogent Engineering, 4(1), 1421006. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2017.1421006
  20. Adi, H., Djailani, A. R., & Ibrahim, S. (2015). Kualitas Pelayanan Perpustakaan Digital Pada SMA Negeri 2 Banda Aceh. Intelektualita, 3(2), 75–80. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/intel/article/view/405/332
  21. Afifah, A., & Santika, S. (2021). Analisis Promosi Layanan Perpustakaan Digital iSabilulungan. Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi Dan Kearsipan, 7(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.14710/lenpust.v7i2.35767
  22. Amran, A. (2018). Sistem Informasi Tes Potensi Akademik Berbasis Website Pada Universitas Musi Rawas. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi MURA, 10(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.32767/jti.v10i2.391
  23. Antasari, I. W. (2017). Analisis Promosi Layanan Bookless di Perpustakaan IAIN Purwokerto. Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 1(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v1i1.208
  24. Edoo Digital Library. (n.d.). https://edoo.id/
  25. Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
  26. Hanum, A. N. L. (2021). Strategi promosi perpustakaan: Film animasi sebagai media edukasi bagi pemustaka. Informatio: Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.24198/inf.v1i2.31077
  27. Harahap, W. R. (2021). PENERAPAN STRATEGI PROMOSI PERPUSTAKAAN Wahfiuddin Rahmad Harahap. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi), 6(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jipi.v6i1.9314
  28. Iswanto, R. (2019). Problematika Layanan Digital Perpustakaan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup dalam Meningkatkan Pemanfaatan Karya Ilmiah Institusi. Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 3(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v3i1.830
  29. Jogatama Purhita, E., Silvi Rahmawati, A., & Hamdanu Budi Nurmana Slamet, A. (2022). Perancangan Video Digital Motion Graphic 2D untuk Promosi Perpustakaan Menggunakan HMDM. Pixel :Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer Grafis, 15(1), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.51903/pixel.v15i1.774
  30. Mardiyanto, V. (2018). Opini dan Analisis Program Layanan Informasi di Perpustakaan dengan Metode Jarak Jauh (Studi Kasus Layanan Informasi Menggunakan Aplikasi Imobile Ipusnas). Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v2i1.396
  31. Mulyadi, M. (2013). Riset Desain Dalam Metodologi Penelitian. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 16(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2012.160106
  32. Patriawati, N., & Hanum, A. N. L. (2021). STRATEGI PROMOSI LAYANAN E-LIBRARY DI PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PONTIANAK PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. Khatulistiwa, 10(12). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v10i12.51102
  33. Prastiko, M. N., & Supriyanto, A. (2020). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Dan Kebijakan Pendidikan. Arah Manajemen Pada Masa Dan Pasca Pandemi Covid-19, 5, 185–188. http://conference.um.ac.id/index.php/apfip/article/view/411
  34. Puspitasari, D. (2021). Strategi Promosi UPT Perpustakaan UMM pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Daluang: Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.21580/daluang.v1i1.2021.7973
  35. Rahman, U., & Nelisa, M. (2014). Strategi Promosi Perpustakaan Di Sma 1 Ix Koto Sungai Lasi. Jurnal Ilmu Informasi Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan, 2(2), 9–21. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/iipk/article/view/3313/2741
  36. Saleh, K. (2012). Implementasi Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Wahana Akademika, 14(02). https://doi.org/10.21580/wa.v14i2.552
  37. Sari Pertiwi, W. H., & Weganofa, R. (2015). Pemahaman Mahasiswa Atas Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Sebuah Refleksi Artikel Hasil Penelitian. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v10i1.3029
  38. Sunu, A. P. (2014). Peran Perpustakaan Digital dan Teknologi Informasi di Era Globalisasi. Persadha, 12(1), 33–37. https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/Info_Persadha/article/view/34/30
  39. Wicaksono, A. (2022). Pengembangan dan Pemanfataan iPusnas untuk Masyarakat di era Milenia. Jurnal IPI (Ikatan Pustakawan Indonesia), 7(1), 49–53. https://jurnal.ipi.web.id/jurnalipi/article/view/138/83
  40. Widodo, E. M., Ulhaq, T. D., Adji, B. N., Fuadyani, R., Almadaniyah, S. A., & Pratama, E. (2021). Modernisasi Perpustakaan dan Digitalisasi Arsip di Perpustakaan Rumah Pintar Desa Sedayu Muntilan Kabupaten Magelang. Community Empowerment, 6(3), 492–497. https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.4298