Back to article list Issue: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020)

Etika Berpakaian Pemustaka: Representasi Lifestyle Pengguna dan Cara Berpikir Kritis Pustakawan di Perpustakaan Menggunakan Ideological State Apparatus

Fauzan Hidayatullah, Kadek Aryana Dwi Putra, Rosnani Abdul Rahman
Open Access
Published: 2020-12-14
Pages: 113-126
Section: Articles
https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v4i2.1573
PDF Copyright

Abstract

Dress ethics is an important factor that is accounted for by an individual in a community. Someone will judge us by our appearance including our dress code. In the library there are regulations regarding the prohibition of using sandals, T-shirts and must be neatly dressed which raises the arena of social class and identity. By using the Ethnographic approach we can understand a social and cultural life in a society scientifically. In this case, we consider the views of the people as the most important thing. The results of this discussion criticize things that should not be taken for granted and open the knowledge of librarians to think critically in managing a library as a source of information

Keywords

Dress Ethics Library Librarian.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


References

  1. Althusser. (1969). for marx. Allen Lane.
  2. Barker, C. (2004). cultural studies teori & praktek. Kreasi Wacana.
  3. Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Framing: Konstruksi Ideologi dan Politik Media. LkiS Yogyakarta.
  4. Eriyanto. (2009). Analisis Wacana. LkiS Yogyakarta.
  5. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977 Michel Foucault. In PowerKnowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 19721977.
  6. Hall, S. (1998). james lull Media, Komunikasi, Kebudayaan. Suatu Pendekatan Global. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  7. Hendariningrum, R., & Edy Susilo, M. (2008). Fashion dan Gaya Hidup: Identitas dan Komunikasi. Ilmu Komunikasi.
  8. Ibrahim. (2007). Budaya Populer sebagai Komunikasi. Jalasutra.
  9. Keraf, A. S. (1998). Etika Bisnis. Kanisius.
  10. Louis Althusser. (2014). On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Verso.
  11. Manan, A. (2014). Akuntansi Dalam Perspektif Budaya Jawa : Sebuah Study Etnografi Pada Pedagang Keliling Di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Akuntansi Terapan (JIMAT), Volume 5 N.
  12. Richard D. Wolff. (2004). Ideological State Apparatuses, Consumerism, andU.S. Capitalism: Lessons for the Left. EconomicsDepartment Working Paper Series.
  13. Sedarmayanti. (2000). Restrukturisasi dan Pemberdayaan Organisasi untuk Menghadapi Dinamika Perubahan Lingkungan. Masdar Maju.
  14. Sesse, M. S. (2016). Aurat Wanita dan Hukum Menutupnya Menurut Hukum Islam. Jurnal Al-Maiyyah.
  15. Shusterman, R., & Jameson, F. (1992). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. https://doi.org/10.2307/431237
  16. Sutopo, O. R. (2019). Memahami cultural studies melalui konsep ideologi.
  17. Tempo. (2018). UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogya Larang Mahasiswi Bercadar.
  18. William. (1973). Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Studies Theory. New Left Review.