CIPP Evaluation Model: Online In-service Teachers Training Program Conducted at English Language Education Study Program of Bengkulu University

Authors

  • Kasmaini Kasmaini Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Syukri Hamzah Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Hadi Winarto Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i1.5871

Keywords:

PPG, CIPP model program evaluation. Online English Study Program

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the teacher professional education program for teachers in positions that are carried out online at the Faculty of Education and Teacher Training at the University of Bengkulu. This research was conducted from September to November 2022 as a qualitative descriptive study. The instruments used were documentation, interviews, and questionnaires. Interviews were conducted with lecturers, PPG students, tutors, and school/madrasah policyholders. The questionnaire is used to see student or participant responses to the implementation of the online learning process. The CIPP evaluation model used focuses on evaluating the context, inputs, processes, and products. Sources of data were obtained from program managers, supervisors, PPG students, school/madrasah principals, tutors, and monitoring and evaluation (monev) results. The data analysis technique used is descriptive data analysis by interpreting the data from each evaluated aspect, then compared with predetermined criteria. Viewed from the context aspect, the FKIP UNIB PPG study program is under the Standard Operating Procedures as the organizer of PPG activities. From an input perspective, the PPG study program is supported by adequate human resources. All lecturers involved, educational staff, tutors, and students are by the program implementation guidelines. In the process aspect, the PPG FKIP UNIB study program has carried out PPG program activities following the SOP. This is evidenced by all the stages carried out in a structured and well-organized manner so that starting from the preparation and implementation processes go well. All well-patterned processes have an impact on the products produced. Referring to the high passing percentage of PPG participants and achieving a passing percentage proves the success of the PPG FKIP UNIB study program in implementing the PPG program. Other successes of the PPG study program have been accredited Superior.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abualoush, S., Masa'deh, R., Bataineh, K., & Alrowwad, A. (2018). The role of the knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organization performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 13, 279–309. https://doi.org/10.28945/4088

Bardach, L., & Klassen, R. M. (2020). Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers’ cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 30(June 2019), 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100312

Bhatia, M. S., & Awasthi, A. (2018). Assessing the relationship between quality management systems and business performance and its mediators: SEM approach. In International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management (Vol. 35, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2017-0091

Farida Yusuf Tayibnapis, Program Evaluation. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2000.

Haris Mujiman, Independent Study-Based Training Management. Yogyakarta: Student Library, 2006.

Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its Role in the Development of the Students’ Academic Success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18–21.

Kim, L. E., Jörg, V., & Klassen, R. M. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teacher Personality on Teacher Effectiveness and Burnout. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9458-2

Linda Darling-Hammond. “Research and Rhetoric on Teacher Certification: A Response to "Teacher Certification Reconsidered" in the journal Education Policy Analysis Archives, Volume 10 Number 36 September 6, 2002 ISSN 1068-2341.

Lubis, F. R., & Hanum, F. (2020). Prociding Title: Proceedings of the 2nd Yogyakarta International Conference on Educational Management/Administration and Pedagogy (YICEMAP 2019). Atlantis Press, 511(Yicemap 2019), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201221.020

McDonald, R. E. (2007). An investigation of innovation in nonprofit organizations: The role of organizational mission. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 256–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295996

Mohamad Fahmi, Achmad Maulana, and Arief Anshory Yusuf. "Teacher Certification in Indonesia: A Confusion of Means and Ends" was published by the Center for Economics and Development Studies (CEDS), Padjadjaran University October, 2011.

Nana Sudjana, Educational Research and Assessment. Bandung: New Light, 1989Oghojafor, B. E. ., Olayemi, O. ., & Okonji, P. S. (2011). Enhancing organization’s performance through effective vision and mission. Chinese Business Review, 10(11), 1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1506/2011.11.005

Stufflebeam, D. L and Chirs LS Coryn,. Evaluation The Theory, Models, and Application Second Edition. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass .2014

Suparman, Endang and Sangadji k. Evaluation of learning programs with the cipp model incollege a theoretical review. https://jurnal.unibrah.ac. id/index.php/IJEIT. Vol 2. No 1. December 2019

Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Routledge.

Wrihatnolo, RRS Evaluation Strategy: Options and Approaches. Institute for Dev and Policy study. 2011

Downloads

Published

2023-05-23

How to Cite

Kasmaini, K., Hamzah, S., & Winarto, H. (2023). CIPP Evaluation Model: Online In-service Teachers Training Program Conducted at English Language Education Study Program of Bengkulu University. ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(1 May), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i1.5871

Citation Check