Developing and Validating a Strategic Translanguaging Framework for Thematic-Integrative Speaking Skill in Islamic Higher Education

Authors

  • Rojja Pebrian Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia
  • Saproni Saproni Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia
  • Gamal Abdul Nasir Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam
  • Rahmat Iswanto Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, Indonesia
  • Rahmah Ahmad Osman International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v10i2.17878

Keywords:

Strategic trans-language, maharah kalam, thematic-integrative learning, Arabic language teaching, scaffolded instruction

Abstract

Maharah kalam (speaking skill) is essential for non-Arab learners in Islamic higher education; however, classroom tasks frequently fall short of fostering the extended, theme-bound discourse required in academic contexts. Consequently, Bahasa Indonesia often enters instruction as an unplanned habit rather than a strategically designed and systematically withdrawn scaffold. To address this gap, this study developed and validated a conceptual framework for strategic translanguaging within thematic-integrative maharah kalam instruction. The study employed a three-phase design: a PRISMA-adapted literature synthesis of publications from 2021 to 2026 (), a double-coded curriculum analysis within the Arabic Language Education Program at Universitas Islam Riau, and an expert validation using Aiken’s V involving five specialists evaluating appropriateness, clarity, and practical utility. The resulting framework integrates input, process, and output components. The instructional process operates through concept explanation, lexical activation, and metacognitive reflection, featuring a structured protocol of translanguaging points and gradual L1 fading. A 100-minute instructional blueprint demonstrates the systematic reduction of L1 reliance within a single unit. Expert evaluation yielded high content validity, with Aiken’s V coefficients ranging from 0.900 to 0.933 (V > 0.80) and an overall feasibility score of 3.75 (Very Good). Although clarity initially received the lowest rating and required primary revision, the experts fully endorsed the protocol for scaffolded L1 integration and withdrawal. This paper establishes the pedagogical feasibility of the framework, while acknowledging that empirical measurement of student speaking gains remains a subject for future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidah, A. L., Setiyawan, A., Fuady S, M. N. A. Q., & Putri, N. A. A. (2026). Teaching maharah al-kalam through digital media in higher education. Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 10(1), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v10i1.13553

Abourehab, Y., & Azaz, M. (2023). Pedagogical translanguaging in community/heritage Arabic language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(5), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1826496

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Anis, M. Y., Malik, A., & Setiyadi, A. C. (2022). Developing creative writing process based on the translation of Arabic phrases: Case study in Arabic prose and poetry. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 10(20), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2023.3

Anwar, M. R., & Hilmi, D. (2025). Students’ critical thinking skills and Arabic learning outcomes using Quizlet media. Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v8i1.30206

Awwaludin, M., Malik, S., & Siswanto, N. D. (2022). Pembentukan lingkungan bahasa Arab dalam meningkatkan penguasaan bahasa Arab pada pesantren bahasa Arab (MIM LAM). Definisi: Jurnal Agama dan Sosial-Humaniora, 1(1), 55–64. https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/definisi/article/view/16716

Bakken, J., & Brevik, L. M. (2023). Challenging the notion of CLIL elitism: A study of secondary school students’ motivation for choosing CLIL in Norway. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1091–1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3173

Cao, Y. (2021). Exploring content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teaching materials in Chinese universities: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions and reflections. International Journal of English and Literature, 12(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEL2021.1444

Feddermann, M., Möller, J., & Baumert, J. (2021). Effects of CLIL on second language learning: Disentangling selection, preparation, and CLIL-effects. Learning and Instruction, 74, 101459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101459

Gunawardane, R., Matthews, J., & Veliz, L. (2025). Identifying themes of curiosity for reading materials in the Sri Lankan ESL university context. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10, 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00357-6

Hu, H. (2022). Factors pertinent to first language use in foreign language classroom: A case of content and language integrated learning. Arab World English Journal, 13(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.12

Hu, H. (2023). Teaching language and content in multicultural and multilingual classrooms: CLIL and EMI approaches. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 753–758. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/263462

Hu, H., Said, N. E. M., & Hashim, H. (2023). Sustaining content and language integrated learning in China: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(5), 3894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053894

Downloads

Published

01-11-2026

How to Cite

Pebrian, R., Saproni, S., Abdul Nasir, G., Iswanto, R., & Ahmad Osman, R. (2026). Developing and Validating a Strategic Translanguaging Framework for Thematic-Integrative Speaking Skill in Islamic Higher Education. Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 10(2), 477–502. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v10i2.17878

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check