Perception Low Grade Teachers to Thematic Learning on Curriculum 2013 at Sumber Rahayu OKU Timur Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v5i1.2082Keywords:
english educationAbstract
The teacher as a human resource is directly confronted with the presence of students. Therefore teachers must equip themselves with various competencies, starting from the preparation of learning administration that must be fulfilled and made. Therefore, it is reasonable if a teacher plays an important role in learning in school. Therefore, it is natural that the existence of teachers plays a very important role in carrying out learning in schools. The research objective was to describe the perceptions of low-grade teachers in implementing thematic learning in the curriculum 2013 at Sumber Rahayu OKU Timur Elementary school. This research is qualitative research that contains words to describe the object under study by collecting data first at the time of the research by using documentation and interviews conducted from April to June 2020. The results of this study are the perception of low-grade teachers on thematic learning in the curriculum 2013 is that (1) the existence and accuracy of the preparation of RPP strongly support the success of learning, (2) learning can be done with interesting and fun even though the teacher does not fully understand the curriculum 2013, (3) the existence of facilities and infrastructure owned by the school to support teaching activities are still inadequate, (4) the overall assessment in the 2013 curriculum was felt to be a quite difficult and complicated burdensome teacher. Recommended, it is necessary to prepare an appropriate thematic learning design according to the 2013 curriculum before learning in class.
Keywords: teacher perceptions, learning thematic, curriculum 2013Downloads
References
Akbar, Sa’dun. (2014). Penyegaran Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis KKNI Kurikulum 2013: Makalah Kuliah Umum. Malang: Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang.
Arikunto, Suharsini. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, Cet. XII.
Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. (2008). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
E. Mulyasa. (2014). Guru dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
E. Mulyasa. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Hermawan, Asep Herry. (2011). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Tematik di Kelas Awal Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Modul Jurusan Kurikulum dan Teknologi Pendidikan FIP UPI.
Imas Kurniasih dan Berlin Sani. (2014). Sukses Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum 2013 Memahami Berbagai Aspek dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kata Pena.
Kunandar. (2007). Guru Profesional Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) dan Sukses Dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Majid, A. (2014). Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Majid, A. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Miles, M. B, Huberman, A.M, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook. Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Permendikbud No. 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian (Salinan Lampiran).
Rusman. (2015). “Curriculum Implementation at Elementary Schools A Study on ‘Best Practices’ Done by Elementary School Teachers in Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating the Curriculumâ€. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079108.pdf Skripsi (Online). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (Diakses pada tanggal 20 Juni 2020).
Rusman. (2015). Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu: Teori, Praktik dan Penilaian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.
Sondang P. S. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&G. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suluh, M & Jumadi. (2019). Persepsi Guru dan Peserta Didik terhadap Proses Pembelajaran Fisika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, Volume 2 Number 2 2019, 62-74.
Syaodih, Nana. (2009). Pengembangan Kurikulum, Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tim Penyusun. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional dan Balai Pustaka.
Trianto. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif - Progresif Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasi pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 78.
Veithzal Rivai. (2006). Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Zainal Arifin. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
