Deskripsi Metadata dalam Manajemen Data Penelitian: Studi Kasus pada Sistem Repositori Ilmiah Nasional

Authors

  • Seno Yudhanto Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia / Universitas Indonesia
  • Nina Mayesti Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v5i1.2486

Keywords:

Metadata, Repository, Research Data, Dataverse

Abstract

Organizing research data is very important for data and information managers through a research data management mechanism (research data management/MDP) in a repository system. In this mechanism, research data must be organized and described as an effort to provide access. One important aspect of organizing is the availability of metadata. This Study was supported by the Institute of Sciences of Indonesia (LIPI) and the SAINTEK Scholarship from the Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (KEMENRISTEK/BRIN) in 2020 and it’s purpose is to identify and describe metadata standards and metadata elements used in research data management in the National Scientific Repository (RIN) system. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Sources of data come from literature / document studies and direct observation. The results of the study show that the RIN system adopts descriptive metadata from three main standards, they are DublinCore, DataCite, and DDI. As a medium for describing research data in general, the metadata sections provided by the RIN system in the dataset folder are quite large and complete. Of the 35 metadata fields available in the dataset folder in this system, the three metadata standards complement each other with an adaptation of the dominant DDI standard with 32 metadata fields. However, the fields that are available can also be found in other standards, such as the title, subject, or keyword fields that are also found in the DublinCore and DataCite standards. Thus, the metadata fields provided in the RIN system is good enough and sufficient for research data management needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alemu, G. (2016). A Theory of Metadata Enriching and Filtering: Challenges and Opportunities to Implementation. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 5, 311–334.

Allen, R. B., (2020). Metadata for Social Science Datasets. In J. I. Lane, I. Mulvany, & P. Nathan (Eds.), Rich Search and Discovery for Research Datasets. Sage Publications Ltd.

Crosas, M. (2013). A Data Sharing Story. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 1(3), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2012.1020.

Data Documentation Initiative. (2012). DDI-Codebook 2.5. Retrieved January 4, 2021, from ddialliance.org website: https://ddialliance.org/Specification/DDI-Codebook/2.5/XMLSchema/codebook.xsd

DataCite Metadata Working Group. (2019). DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Version 4.3. DataCite e.V. https://doi.org/10.14454/7xq3-zf69.

Dataverse-Team, T. (2018). The Dataverse Project: Dataverse Documentation Release 4.10. USA: Havard University.

Dublin Core. (2020). DCMI: DCMI Metadata Terms. Retrieved January 4, 2021, from www.dublincore.org website: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/source

Farnel, S., & Shiri, A. (2014). Metadata for Research Data: Current Practices and Trends. Proceeding International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications.

Gregg, W., Erdmann, C., Paglione, L., Schneider, J., & Dean, C. (2019). A literature review of scholarly communications metadata. Research Ideas and Outcomes. doi:10.3897/rio.5.e38698

Jünger, S., Borschewski, K., & Zenk-Möltgen, W. (2019) Documenting Georeferenced Social Science Survey Data: Limits of Metadata Standards and Possible Solutions, Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 15:1, 68-95, DOI: 10.1080/15420353.2019.1659903

Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. Peraturan Kepala Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia tentang Repositori dan Depositori, 12 § (2016).

Miller, C.F., Miller, R.S., and Phillips, G.A. (2018). "Keeping Up With… Research Data Management", American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/keeping_up_with/rdm (Accessed November 26, 2020). Document ID: 0c271f0c-e0ba-4306-8278-cdcff353a83c

Riyanto, S., Subagyo, H., Marlina, E., Yaniasih, Y., & Triasih, H. (2019). BAGAIMANA MENGHUBUNGKAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH DENGAN DATA PENELITIAN?. BACA: JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI, 40(1), 41-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v40i1.485

Rousidis, D., Garoufallou, E., Balatsoukas, P., & Sicilia, M.-A. (2014). Metadata for Big Data: A preliminary investigation of metadata quality issues in research data repositories. Information Services & Use, 34(3–4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-140746

Tang, R., & Hu, Z. (2019). Providing Research Data Management (RDM) Services in Libraries: Preparedness, Roles, Challenges, and Training for RDM Practice, Data and Information Management, 3(2), 84-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2019-0009

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-06-15

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).