A Comparative Analysis of TOEIC Listening and Reading Performance among Diploma Students in Vocational Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v10i1%20May.17553Keywords:
TOEIC, English Proficiency, Vocational Education, Listening Comprehension, Reading ComprehensionAbstract
English proficiency is a critical skill needed by vocational students who are to join the international workforce. The Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC), is one of the widely used tests to assess workplace-oriented English proficiency, which is a testing of listening and reading skills that are needed in a professional setting. The study compared the levels of performance of Diploma 3 (D3) and Diploma 4 (D4) students in vocational higher education in terms of TOEIC listening and reading performance. The research design used in this study was quantitative comparative research design. The sample comprised of 59 students with 35 students in the D3 program and 24 students in the D4 program from Business Administration major. The data were taken out of a TOEIC prediction test, which was taken at the end of the TOEIC preparation course. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test were used to analyze the scores to determine whether there were significant differences between the two groups. The results indicated that students in D4 group scored higher on both listening and reading portions of the test than students in D3 group did. The statistical treatment also showed that there were significant differences in the two skills. These results indicated that the variation in academic exposure and length of learning might have an impact on the development of English proficiency in students. The study indicated that, in vocational English training, structured TOEIC preparation, and specific reading and listening activities were important to better equip students to meet the communication requirements of the workplace.
Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Educational Testing Service. (2022). TOEIC Listening and Reading Test examinee handbook. https://www.ets.org/toeic.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Field, J. (2019). Rethinking the second language listening test: From theory to practice. Equinox.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Green, A. (2014). Exploring language assessment and testing: Language in action. Routledge.
Jackson, D. (2019). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 44(7), 1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1531292.
Kremmel, B., & Harding, L. (2020). Towards a comprehensive, empirical model of language assessment literacy across stakeholder groups: Developing the language assessment literacy survey. Language Testing, 37(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219859884.
Nguyen, T. H., & Gu, P. Y. (2020). Graduate employability and English language competence in Asian higher education contexts. Journal of Education and Work, 33(6), 421–435.
Pan, Y. C. (2020). The effect of TOEIC-oriented instruction on EFL learners' language performance and test readiness. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(4), 356–372.
Pavlova, M. (2020). Vocationalization of secondary and higher education: Pathways to the world of work. Springer.
Read, J. (2015). Assessing English proficiency for university study. Palgrave Macmillan.
Succi, C., & Canovi, M. (2020). Soft skills to enhance graduate employability: Comparing students' and employers' perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1834–1847. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1585420.
Tsai, Y. R. (2022). English learning exposure and receptive skill development among university EFL learners. TESOL International Journal, 17(2), 55–71.
Winke, P., & Lim, H. (2021). Language test scores and employability in international business contexts. Language Testing in Asia, 11, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00135-0.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Leni Rohliah, Wirda Ningsih, Aisyah Shahab

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).






