Attitudes toward AI in Writing: Opportunities and Challenges for English Students’ Writing Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v10i1%20May.14914Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Attitudes, Writing ProficiencyAbstract
The objective of this study was to examine the influence of learning and innovation skills on students’ attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in writing and its effect on their writing proficiency. A sequential explanatory mixed-method design was employed to provide both statistical and in-depth insights. The quantitative data were gathered by means of questionnaire and writing assessment from 34 second semester English Department students of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi through stratified random sampling from the population of 120 students. The questionnaire measured students’ attitudes towards AI in writing through communicative, behavioural, and cognitive indicators and the IELTS writing rubric was used to assess writing proficiency. To understand the experiences and perceptions of AI tools such as ChatGPT and Grammarly, qualitative data was collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations of seven purposively selected participants. The results showed that students’ attitude towards AI significantly affected their writing skills (Sig. = 0.006 < 0.05). Students who had positive and critical attitudes towards AI produced more coherent, original and well-organized writing, whereas students who were overly dependent on AI performed worse and showed lower creativity. The study finds standard artificial intelligence can be an effective assistive device in developing writing ability when it is paired with sufficient cognitive and ethical consciousness. These findings underline the significance of advocating digital literacy as a norm, critical thinking, and responsible utilization of AI in English language education.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, A., and Shakir, A. (2022). The Relationship Between Vocabulary Depth and Argumentative Essay Writing Proficiency Among IELTS Test Takers in Pakistan. Linguistic Forum - A Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2022.4.3.9
Abidin, D. M. (2012). EFL students' attitude toward learning English language: The case of Libyan secondary school students. Asian Social Science, 8(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n2p119
Alhamami M (2022) Language Learners’ Attitudes Toward Online and Face-To-Face Language Environments. Front. Psychol. 13:926310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926310
Al-Tamimi, A., &Shuib, M. (2009). Motivation and attitudes towards learning English: A study of petroleum engineering undergraduates at Hadhramout university of sciences and technology. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 9(2), 29-55.
Apriani, E., Daulay, S. H., Aprilia, F., Marzuki, A. G., Warsah, I., & Supardan, D. (2025). A mixed-method study on the effectiveness of using ChatGPT in academic writing and students’ perceived experiences. Journal of Language and Education, 11(1 (41)), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.17913
Apriani, E., Muthmainnah, M., Wijayanti, E., Kons, B. A., & Al Yakin, A. (2024). Accelerating Student's Creativity in Writing Paragraph through Artificial Intelligence Technology. In AI-Oriented Competency Framework for Talent Management in the Digital Economy (pp. 305-322). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003440901-19
Bibi, Z., and Atta, A. (2024). The Role of ChatGPT as AI English Writing Assistant: A Study of Student’s Perceptions, Experiences, and Satisfaction. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(I). https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)39
Brandt, D. R. (2005). Attitude does matter (Marketing News White Paper Series, Vol. 2).
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Efriza, D., Zaim, M., & Zainil, Y. (2026). The effect of digital literacy on the application of AI for the enhancement of writing skills. International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 10 (1), 250 - 261. https://dx.doi.org/10.62527/joiv.10.1.4035
Erkan, D.Y. and Saban, A.I.. (2011). Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL. Asian EFL Journal. 13. 164-192.
Fitria, N. T. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. Englisia Journal. 9. 183. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233
Gao, B., Liu, R., Chu, J. (2025). Exploring Trends of Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Degen, H., Ntoa, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in HCI. HCII 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 15819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93412-4_11
Gunawan, Fathoroni, Astini, N. B., Herayanti, L., Suranti, Y. M. N. (2024). Peningkatan Keterampilan Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah Melalui Pelatihan Berbantuan Artificial Intelligence. Indonesian Journal of Education and Community Services, 4 (1), 17-23
Habók A and Magyar A (2018) The Effect of Language Learning Strategies on Proficiency, Attitudes and School Achievement. Front. Psychol. 8:2358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02358
Heale, R., and Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-based nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
Herwiana, Sakhi and Laili, Elisa. (2021). Students’ Attitude Towards English Language Learning. Journal of Educational Method and Technology. 2. https://doi.org/10.36412/jemtec.v2i3.1026
Hinton, G. (2018). Deep learning - A technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA, 320(11), 1101-1102. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11100
Kaharuddin, K. (2021). Assessing the effect of using artificial intelligence on the writing skill of Indonesian learners of English. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5 (1), 288-304. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1555
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Standler, M., and Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kellogg, R. T., Olive, T., and Pilot, A. (2001). Verbal, visual and spatial working memory in written language production. ACTA Psychologica. 124, 382-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.02.005
Kurniati, E. Y., and Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852
Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2007). Introduction. In M. Knobel and C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Lee, H., and Lee, H. J. (2022). Interpreting the effectiveness of academic English writing programmes in higher education: A meta-analysis. Oxford Review of Education, 49(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2072284
Lee, S. H., Bernstein, M., and Georgieva, Z. (2019). Online collaborative writing revision intervention outcomes for struggling and skilled writers: An initial finding. Preventing School Failure, 63(4), 297-307. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2018.1504741
Liu, Y., Mishan, F., and Chambers, A. (2018). Investigating EFL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching in higher education in China. The Language Learning Journal, 49(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1465110
Liu, Y., Mittal, A., Yang, D., and Bruckman, A. (2022, April). Will AI console me when I lose my pet? Understanding perceptions of AI-mediated email writing. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517731
Lund, B. D., and Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29. https://doi.org/10. 1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Mdodana-Zide, L., and Mukuna, K. (2023). Enhancing the academic writing skills of first-year English second language students at a South African university. Journal of Contemporary Studies in Research, 5(2), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2023.27
Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320
Sulaeman , Anggraini, R., Paramansyah, A., Fata, H. T., Judijanto, L. (2024). Peran Artificial Intelligences Sebagai Alat Bantu Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Era Disruptif. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4 (1). https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative
Supiani. (2017). Teaching writing skill through collaborative writing technique: From theory to practice. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 4(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v4i1.330
Wang, Z. (2022). Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case from a college reading and writing course. Library Hi Tech, 40(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-05-2020-0113
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dony Efriza, Affan Yusra, Heri Usmanto, Rully Andi Yaksa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
