A Bibliometric Analysis of Blended Learning Approaches in English Language Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v9i2%20November.14544Keywords:
Blended Learning, English Education, Bibliometric AnalysisAbstract
This study conducts quantitative bibliometric evaluation to evaluate the advancements and thematic distributions of the research relating to blended learning in English education. This project intends to perform a bibliometric analysis of 2024. Publications indexed in Scopus on blended learning in English education to identify the patterns, trends, and topics of this contemporary research. By collecting and analyzing ten Scopus-indexed articles published in 2024 using tools such as VOSviewer and Publish or Perish, the research maps key patterns in scholarly output, including citation frequency, methodological tendencies, and keyword co-occurrence. The bibliometric data reveal a growing scholarly interest in integrating technology with pedagogical practices to improve English language learning outcomes. Among the ten analyzed articles, diverse methodological approaches were found, including experimental research, bibliometric reviews, case studies, and mixed-methods designs. A broader search indicated a total of 170 related publications within a single year, reflecting the rapid expansion of the field. Keyword network visualization categorized the research landscape into three dominant clusters: practical applications in higher education, foundational research design, and digital learning perceptions. The results show that blended learning's adaptability and the ability to meet various learner needs have enabled it to become a transformative tool in English education. These findings also offer a better grasp of the complexities of research, facilitating future work and the design of policies for teaching and learning in the digital era.
Downloads
References
Alam, S. (2024). Efficacy of Mixed Model Instruction To Improve English Language Skills of Business Management Students: an Experimental Study. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(2), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.387.402.
Asmawi, A., Dong, H., Zhang, X., & Sun, L. (2024). Exploring the transformative power of blended learning for Business English majors in China (2012–2022) – A bibliometric voyage. Heliyon, 10(2), e24276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24276.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamim, R., Surkes, M., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why "what works" won't work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x.
Chen, Y., & Dong, Z. (2024). Students’ Psychological Analysis for Classroom Teaching Strategies of Art Songs Based on STEAM Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010323.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gayatri, P., & Sit, H. (2024). The Adaption of Sustainable Blended Global Discussion (SBGD) in English as a Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121279.
Graham, C. R., & Allen, S. (2019). Designing blended learning environments. In P. D. Denman (Ed.), Handbook of research on digital learning (pp. 89–102). IGI Global.
Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2014). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey-Bass.
Jiang, L. (2024). Factors influencing EFL teachers’ implementation of SPOC-based blended learning in higher vocational colleges in China: A study based on grounded theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(3), 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2100428.
Khan, M. O., & Khan, S. (2024). Influence of online versus traditional learning on EFL listening skills: A blended mode classroom perspective. Heliyon, 10(7), e28510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28510.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024.
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers & Education, 157, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI:10.1002/asi.4630240406.
Sudewi, P. W. (2020). Learning Experiences Using Blended Learning on Efl Learners At Sulawesi Barat University. Jurnal Basis, 7(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v7i1.1787.
Teng, Y., Yin, Z., Wang, X., & Yang, H. (2024). Investigating relationships between community of inquiry perceptions and attitudes towards reading circles in Chinese blended EFL learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00440-x.
Usama, M. (2024a). The Impact of Rotation Model on Minimizing Inflectional Morphemes Errors in English Writing: A Comparative Study of Error Analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(2), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.01.
Usama, M. (2024b). Web-Based Vs. Mixed Mode Instruction Utilizing E-Learning via LMS: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(4), 612–619. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.4.2084.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y., Wu, J., Chen, F., & Li, J. (2024). Analyzing Teaching Effects of Blended Learning With LMS: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Access, 12, 42343–42356. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352169.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Putu Sudewi, Asti Wahyuni, Syahrullah Syahrullah, Nur Husnil Khatimah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
