Discourse Markers in Tertiary Level Students’ Essay Writing: Ability and Problems

Authors

  • Winny Agustia Riznanda Islamic State University Raden Fatah Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v5i1.1193

Keywords:

discourse markers, coherence, cohesion, essays

Abstract

Writing is a fundamental, yet complicated part of language learning. In writing, Discourse Markers is an indispensable component of writing quality. The aim of the present study was to find out how Discourse Markers (DM) were applied to build coherence in EFL students’ essay writing and the problems encountered. Descriptive design was applied; analyzed 52 target DM and how they were used in 30 academic essay writing. The participants of the study were 30 students majoring in English Education of UIN Raden Fatah Palembang academic year 2019/2020. The results revealed that the participants employ 32 DM in 221 occurrences, in which 102 occurrences were inappropriately used. The problematic matters cover non-equivalent exchange (52 occurrences), and overuse (48 occurrences). Despite their awareness of the importance of DM to assure the coherence of their essays, they need to develop their ability to use DM correctly and efficiently to make their writing connected more logically.

 

Keywords: discourse markers, coherence, essays.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Winny Agustia Riznanda, Islamic State University Raden Fatah Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia

Department of English Education

References

Aijmer, K. (2002). English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.10.

Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Unversity Press.

Aijmer, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2006). Pragmatic Markers in Contrast. Oxford: Elsevier.

Altenberg, B. (2006). The function of adverbial connectors in the second initial position in English and Swedish. In K. Aijmer, & A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen (Eds.), Pragmatic Markers in Contrast (pp. 11-37). Oxford: Elsevier.

Andersen, E., Brizuela, M., DuPuy, B., & Gonnerman, L. (1999). Cross-linguistic evidence for the acquisition of discourse markers as register variables. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 339–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0378-2166(98)00108-8 .

Andersen, G. (2001). Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378- 2166(98)00108-8.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.

Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Blackmore, D. (1992). Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.

Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456.

Bolton, K., Nelson G., & Hung, J. (2002). A corpus-based study of connectors in student writing. Research from the International Corpus of English in Hong Kong (ICE-HK). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(2), 165-182. Retrieved from http://englishteachersplace.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/09/A-Corpus-based-study-of-connectors-in-studentwriting.pdf.

Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles. an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. (3rd ed). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Castro, C. (2004). Cohesion and the social construction of meaning in the essays of Filipino college students writing in L2 English.Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), 215-225

Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book (2nd ed.). Michigan: Heinle & Heinle.

Cho, Y. (1998). Use of connectives in writings by Korean learners of English.

(Report No. ED441348). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED441348.

Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 17, 301- 316.

Crossley, A., & McNamara, S. (2011). Shared features of L2 writing: Intergroup homogeneity and text classification. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 271-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jslw.2011.05.007

Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S.A. (2010). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum – a case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), pp. 34 - 47. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890711.pdf.

Field, Y., & Yip, L. M. O. (1992). A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English. RELC Journal, 25(1), 15-28.

Fischer, K. (2006). Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles: Introduction to the volume. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles. Oxford: Elsevier.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931-952.

Granger, S., & Tyson, S. (1996). Connector usage in English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, 15(1), 19-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00089.x.

Hinkel, E. (2001). Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Halliday, M.A.K.,& Hasan, R.(1976). Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.

Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication, 2, 224-245. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/002194369803500203.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.

Jalififar, A. 2008. Discourse markers in composition writing: The case of Iranian learners of English as foreign language teaching. English Language Teaching, 1(2), 114-122.

Johnson, P. (1992). Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and English language. RELC Journal, 23(2), 1–17.

Kao, T.Y.& Chen, L.M. (2011, November). Diagnozing discoursal organization in learner via conjunctive adverbial. Paper presented at the 23rd Conferenceon Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing, Pittsburgh.

Kellog, Ronald T. (2008). Training Writing Skills: A Cognitive Developmental Perspective Journal of Writing Research. USA: Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University.

Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623-635.

McCarthy, M. (1993). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Martinez, C. L. (2004). Discourse markers in the expository writing of Spanish university students. IBERICA, 8, 63-80

Modhish, A. (2012). Use of Discourse Markers in the Composition Writings of Arab EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 56-61.

Müller, S. (2004). Well, you know that type of person: Functions of ‘Well’ in the speech of American and German students. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(6), 1157-1182.

Narita, M., Sato, C. & Sugiura, M. (2004). Connector usage in the English essay writing of Japanese EFL learners. Proceedings of the Fourth InternationalConference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1171-1174. Retrieved from http://gandalf.aksis.uib.no/non/lrec2004/papers.htm.

Oktavianti, D., Gusmuliana, P., & Apriani, E. (2021). The Students’ Strategies in Developing Their Ideas in Writing Essay. Jadila: Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education, 1(4), 389-406.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English (4thed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Patriana, A.W., Rachmajanti, S., & Mukminatien, N. Students’ ability in using discourse markerso to build coherence in compositions. TEFLIN Journal, 27(2), 2016. Retrieved fromhttp://teflin.org/journal/index.php/journal/article/view/332/270.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., &Svartvik, J. (1985). Comprehensive Grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

Rahimi, M. (2011). Discourse markers in argumentative and expository writing of Iranian EFL learners. World Journal of English Language, 1(2), 68-78.

Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writing. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Redeker, G. (1991). Review article: Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29, 1139-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.6.1139.

Sanjaya, H. K., Apriani, E., & Edy, S. (2020). Using web blogs in teaching writing for EFL students. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 4(4), 516-535.

Schiffrin, D. (2001). Discourse markers: language, meaning, and context. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton, Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 56-75). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse Markers. Lingua, 107, 227-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841 (96)90026-1

Schourup, L. (2011). The discourse marker now: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(8), 2120-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.005

Setyowati, L., & Sukmawan, S. (2013). EFL Indonesian students’ attitude toward writing in English. Arab World English Journal, 7(4), pp. 365- 378. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2898636

Seow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of current practice (pp. 315-320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Swan, M. (2005). Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tadayyon, M. (2017). Exploring discourse markers used in academic papers: A comparative corpus-based inquiry of Iranian and English native writers. Iranian EFL Journal.

Tapper, M.(2005).Connectives in advanced Swedish EFL learners' written English- preliminary results. The Department of English: Working Papers in English Linguistics, 5, 116- 144

Tyler, A., & Bro, J. (1992). Discourse structure in nonnative English discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 71-86.

White, E. M. (1998). Developing Successful College Writing Programs. Portland, ME: Calendar Islands Publishers

Wei Sun. (2013). The Importance of Discourse Markers in English Learning and Teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3 (11), 2136-2140 Williams, J. D. (2014). Preparing to Teach Writing: Research, theory, and practice (4th ed.). NY: Routledge

Zamel, V. (1983). Teaching those missing links in writing. ELT Journal, 37(1), 22-29.

Zhang, M. (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC Journal, 31(1), 61-95.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-05-28

How to Cite

Riznanda, W. A. (2021). Discourse Markers in Tertiary Level Students’ Essay Writing: Ability and Problems. ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 5(1 May), 01–16. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v5i1.1193

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 May (2021): ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education provides scientific manuscripts of research results in the field of English Language and Education. This issue has been available online since 28th May 2021. All articles in this issue (10 original research articles) were authored/co-authored by 18 authors from 11 affiliations and 1 country (Indonesia).

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).