Cohesive Devices Used in Argumentative Essays of Undergraduate EFL Students in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v3i02.1164Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study analyzed qualitatively the cohesive devices used in argumentative essays of undergraduate EFL students in South Sumatera, Indonesia. Eighty essays were collected from eight universities in which ten essays were obtained from each. Halliday and Hasan (1976) concept of grammatical cohesion was used as the framework for the analysis of the essays. All the cohesive devices were found. Reference had the highest frequency which is 50.24% of the total cohesive devices followed by conjuction which is 37.34%, lexical cohesion which is 7.7% and ellipsis which is 3.57%. Substitution was the least used type of cohesive device which is only 1.15%. In terms of correctness of using the devices, most of the devices were all used properly. It was revealed that there was still few mistakes of using reference and substitution since they both were frequently used in the essays. Hence, it can be concluded that the students are more familiar with the use of reference and conjunction even though they are able to use the other devices as well.
Keywords: cohesive devices, argumentative essay
Downloads
References
Adiantika, H. N. (2015). Cohesive devices in EFL students’ expository writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 4(1). Retrieved from https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEE.
Alarcon, J.B. & Morales, K.N.S. Grammatical cohesion in students’ argumentative essay. Journal of English and Literature, 2(5), 114-127. Retrieved from: www.academicjournals.org/ijel
Axelrod, R.B., & Cooper, C. R. (1988). The St. Martin’s guide to writing. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16 (4), 479-488.
Cho, H. Y., & Shin, J. (2014). Cohesive device in English Writing Textbooks and Korean Learners’ English Writings. English Teaching. 69(1). 41-59.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication.
Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. (2010). Academic literacy: The Importance and impact of writing across the curriculum-a case study. Journal of the Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning, 10(2), 34-47. Retrieved from www.iupui.edu/~josotl.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.
Hasan, M.R. 2005. Cohesive features in written discourse: An analysis of narrative essays of S2 students of English language education program of the state university of malang. Unpublished Thesis. Malang: State University of Malang.
Hasannejad, M. R, Assadi, N., Kazemi, A. S., Kohgiluyeh & Ahmad, B. (2012). Substitution as a device of grammatical cohesion in English contexts. The Journal of Applied Linguistics,(5)1.
Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hung, D. M., & Thu, V. T. (2014). Vietnamese learners’ attention and use of cohesive device in English essay writing at Dong Thap University. Asian Journal of Educational Research 2(2). 1-14.
Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London, UK: Pearson Education.
Hyland, K. (1990). A genre-description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal. 21(1), 66-78.
Irwin, J. W. (1982). Cohesion and comprehension. Illinois Reading Council Journal. Newark, DL: International Reading Association.
Markels, R.B. (1984). A new perspective on Cohesion in Expository Paragraphs. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Mohamed, N. (2016). Use of conjunctions in argumentative essay by ESL undergraduates. e-Academia Journal UiTMT, 5(1). 1-13.
Olateju, M. A. (2006). Cohesion in ESL classroom written texts. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15(3), 314-331.
Palmer, J. C. (1999). Coherence and cohesion in the English language classroom: The use of lexical reiteration and pronominalisation. RELC Journal, 30(2).
Podis, J.M., & Podis, L.A. (1996). Rethinking writing. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Ruetten, M.K., & Smalley, R.L. (1994). Refining composition skills. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Sparks,J. (2007). The Advanced Writing Handbook for ESOL. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
Walsh, K. (2010). The importance of writing skills: Online tools to encourage success. Retrieved from http://www.emergingedtech.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
