Fuat Sezgin's Thoughts on Hadith Criticism: Revisiting Ignaz Goldziher's Views on Doubts about the Authenticity of Hadith
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i3.8807Keywords:
Fuat, Ignaz Goldziher, hadith criticismAbstract
Ignaz Goldziher's views on hadith have elicited both support and criticism from Muslim scholars. Fuat Sezgin, a prominent Islamic scholar, disputed Goldziher's claim that hadiths narrated by classical scholars were inauthentic due to their reliance on sanad rather than matan criticism. Sezgin contends that the oral tradition of hadith transmission and his identification of some false hadiths in Sahih Bukhari weaken Goldziher's argument. This paper examines the differing perspectives of Ignaz Goldziher and Fuat Sezgin on hadith. Utilizing a literature research approach, it employs a descriptive-analytical method to elucidate the ideas of these two scholars. The research concludes that Goldziher's critique arose from a fundamental misunderstanding, as the narration method he criticized differed from that of classical scholars. Furthermore, the assertion that hadith was not documented in writing until later stages is refuted, as the Companions had recorded it in the Shahifah during the Prophet's time. Goldziher's identification of false hadiths in Bukhari is attributed to his focus on matan, leading him to consider them as fabrications by Bukhari.
Downloads
References
Abbott, Nania. Hadith Literature-II: Collection and Transmission of Hadith. Camridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Adyatama, Muhammad Fajar, dan Umi Sumbulah. “Muhammad Mustafa Azami: Kontribusi Pemikiran dan Bantahannya Terhadap Kajian Hadis di Kalangan Orientalis.†Jurnal Holistic al- Hadis Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020).
Ahsan, Mohammad Nur. “Dari Sejarah ke Studi Hadis: Memahami Metode Sejarah Kritis dan Penanggalan Hadis di Barat.†Al- Quds: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021).
Albab, Muhammad Ulul. “MENYOAL KONEKSITAS KRITIK HADITS IGNAZ GOLDZIHER DAN JOSEPH SCHACHT.†An-Nisa’: Journal of Gender Studies 14, no. 1 (5 April 2021): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v14i1.42.
Amin, Kamaruddin. Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis. Cet. 1. Jakarta Selatan: Hikmah, 2009.
Amin, Komaruddin. “Book Review The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence. Meccan Fiqh before the Classical Schools†Vol. 41 No. 1 (2003).
Anwar, Latifah. “Hadis dan Sunnah Perspektif Joseph Schacht.†Jurnal Ilmu Al-Quran dan Hadis Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020).
Arslan, Taha Yasin. “İslâm Araştırmalarına Adanan Bir Asırlık Hayat: Fuat Sezgin (1924-2018).†İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi 0, no. 41 (2019): 201–5. https://doi.org/10.26570/isad.514037.
Asri Nasir, Muhammad, dan Ahmad Ramzy Amiruddin. “Klasifikasi Model Pemikiran Orientalis Hadis Perspektif Herbert Berg.†Aqlam: Journal of Islam and Plurality Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021).
Bakker, Anton, dan Ahmad Charis Zubair. Metode Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1992.
Buchari, Mannan. Menyingkap Tabir Orientalisme. Jakarta: Amzah, 2006.
Goldziher, Ignaz. Muslim Studies ( Muhammedanische Studies), Tans. Barber dan S.M. Stern. Vol. II. London: George Allen and UNWIN, 1971.
———. Muslim Studies (Muhammedanische Studien). Chicago: State University Of New York, 1971.
Habibi, M. Dani. “Pandangan Ignaz Goldziher Terhadap Asal- Usul Munculnya Hadis Nabi Muhammad SAW.†AKTUALITA Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Kegamaan Vol. 10 (2020).
Hasan, Puad. “Kajian Hadis Di Kalangan Orientalis.†Edusifa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022).
Idri. Hadis Dan Orientalis: Perspektif Ulama Hadis Dan Orientalis Tentang Hadis Nabi. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
———. “Perspektif Orientalis Tentang Hadis Nabi: Telaah Kritis dan Implikasinya Terhadap Eksistensi dan Kehujjahannya.†Al- Tahrir Vol. 11 No. 1 (Mei 2011).
———. Problematika Autentisitas Hadis Nabi dari Klasik hingga Kontemporer. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2020.
Karalar, Şeyma. “Fuat Sezgin’in İslam Bilim Tarihi Çalışmalarında Astronomi Astronomy in Fuat Sezgin’s History of Science Studies,†2020.
Kocabaş, Sadık. “Ömrünü İlme Vakfetmiş Bir Âlim: Mehmet Fuat Sezgin.†Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 21 (29 November 2019): 80–93. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.600315.
Lutfia, Nurul Naffa, Suci Indah Sari, Tiara Azzahra Hidayah, Yeni Heriani, dan Mochamad Ziaul Haq. “Pemikiran Orientalis Ignaz Goldziher Terhadap Hadis Dan Sunnah.†Alhamra Jurnal Studi Islam 3, no. 2 (12 Oktober 2022): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v3i2.13839.
Masrur, Ali. “Analisa Komparatif Antara Pendekatan Tradisional dan Pendekataan Revisionis.†Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies Vol. 1, No. 2 (2012).
Nasir, Sitti Magfirah, La Ode Ismail Ahmad, dan Abustani Ilyas. “Kritik Atas Kritik Kamaruddin Amin: (Menguji Kembali Keakuratan) Metode Kritik Hadis.†Ihyaussunna Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021).
Permana, Dudi, Arzam, Muhammad Ridha DS, Muhammad Yusuf, dan Doli Witro. “Studi Komparatif atas Pemikiran Ignaz Goldziher dan Joseph Schacht Tentang Kritik Hadis.†Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021).
Powers, David Stephan. Studies in Qur’an and Hadith: The Formation of the Islamic Law of Inheritance. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986.
Raihan, dan Syafieh. “Menyoal Kritik Ignaz Goldziher Terhadap Al- Qur’an Dalam Kitab Mazhahib Al- Tafsir Al- Islami.†AL FAWATIH : Jurnal Kajian Al- Qur’an dan Hadis Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022).
Saniri, dan Abdul Fatah Idris. “HADIS-HADIS PREDIKTIF DAN TEKNIS Studi Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman.†Didaktika Islamika : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Muhammadiyah Kendal 12, no. 02 (2 Agustus 2021): 76–92.
Sezgin, Fuat, dan Sefer Turan. Bilimler tarihçisi Fuat Sezgin. 1. baskı. Bilim Tarihi dizisi 1. İstanbul: Timaş, 2010.
Sholihah, Izzatus. “Kajian Hadits Perspektif Orientalis.†Jurnal SAMAWAT Vol. 06 No. 01 (2022).
Supian, Aan. “Studi Hadis Di Kalangan Orientalisme.†Nuansa Vol. IX No. 1 (Juni 2016).
Trisliatanto, Dimas Agung. Metodologi Penelitian : Panduan Lengkap Penelitian dengan Mudah. 1 ed. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi, 2020.
Wazna, Ruhama. “Metode Kontemporer Menggali Otentisitas Hadis (Kajian Pemikiran Harald Motzki).†Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 17 No. 12 (2018).
Yaqub, Ali Musthafa. Kritik Hadis. Cet. IX. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2020.
Yaqub, Ali Mustofa. Islam Masa Kini. Jakarta: Firdaus, 2001.
Zaimah. “Orientalis Versus Ulama: Studi Kritik Terhadap Hadis Nabi.†Rusydiah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 2 No. 1 (Juni 2021).
Zulfikri. “Orientalisme Hadis (Peta Kajian Hadis Orientalis).†TAJDID Vol. 16 No. 2 (November 2013).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Alwi Nasir, Zulfahmi Alwi, Siti Aisyah Kara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Scopus
Sinta 
Address:
Al Quds Contact Info:
Hasep Saputra 