Religious Conversion in Hadith and the Discourse of Muslim Scholars

Authors

  • Zaenal Muttaqin Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Suprijati Sarib Institut Agama Islam Negeri Manado, Indonesia
  • Husain Husain Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene, Indonesia
  • Rahman Rahman Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
  • Siti Rohmah Institut Ilmu Al-Qur'an Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sabil Mokodenseho Institut Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Kotamobagu, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-3673

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i2.7576

Keywords:

Apostasy, Death Penalty, Muslim Scholars, Ahkam Hadiths, Takhrij Hadith

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the status of hadiths that serve as the basis for the imposition of sanctions on individuals who convert from Islam to other beliefs (apostasy) and the views of Muslim scholars in understanding the legal messages behind hadiths on apostasy. This study addresses questions regarding the wording, transmission, and status of hadiths on apostasy, as well as how Muslim scholars define apostasy and interpret the legal messages of apostasy sanctions in the hadiths of the Prophet. The study utilizes the method of takhrij hadith with an analytical-descriptive approach. Both primary and secondary research data are gathered from various literary sources. The study finds that hadiths on the legal sanctions for apostasy have two forms of wording: "man baddala dinahu faqtuluhu - whoever changes his religion, kill him" and "la yahilllu damumriin muslimin illa tsalasin - no Muslim's blood is lawful except for three cases." Hadiths on apostasy sanctions fall into the category of ahad hadiths with a degree of authenticity (sahih). Furthermore, the study reveals the evolution of Muslim scholars' understanding of apostasy, wherein apostasy was initially understood solely as a departure from the Islamic faith (i'tiqad) but later came to be seen as a departure accompanied by enmity towards Islam. The scholars themselves are divided into two major groups in their interpretation of the position of hadiths on apostasy, namely the classical Muslim scholars who interpret it as a legal ruling that can be implemented against apostates. In contrast, contemporary Muslim scholars have started to criticize and reinterpret the status of these hadiths, emphasizing the need to reconsider the contextualized understanding of the legal message of apostasy sanctions. The significant contribution of this study lies in clarifying the status of hadiths on apostasy sanctions and illustrating the dynamic understanding of Muslim scholars regarding the implementation of these hadiths' messages

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sabil Mokodenseho, Institut Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Kotamobagu

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=qOjI4GYAAAAJ&hl=id

References

‘Abdurrazzaq, Nu‘man. Ahkam Al-Murtad Fi Al-Syari‘ah Al-Islamiyyah. Riyadh: Dar al-‘Ulum, 1983.

Al-Asqalani, Abi al-Fadl Ahmad. Tahdib Al-Tahdib. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1994.

Al-Asqalani, Ahmad Ali Ibn Hajar. Fath Al-Bari. Dar al-Rayyan li al-Turath, n.d.

Al-Fannani, Zainuddin bin Abdul Aziz al-Malibari. Fathul Mu’in. 2nd ed. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo, 2014.

Al-Juzairi, Syaikh Abdurrahman. Al-Fiqhu ‘Ala Al-Madzahib Al-Arba’Ah. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, n.d.

Al-Khatib, Muhammad Ajaj. Ushul Al-Hadith ‘Ulumuhu Wa Musthalahuhu. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1989.

———. Ushul Al-Hadits: ’Ilmuhu Wa Musthalahuhu. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1975.

Al-Syafi’i, Imam Abu Abdillah Muhammad bin Idris. Al-Umm. Jakarta: Pustaka Abdi Bangsa, 2020.

Ash-Shalabi, Ali Muhammad. Sirah Amir Al-Mu’minin Ali Bin Abi Thalib. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2012.

Ath-Thahan, Mahmud. Taisir Musthalah Al-Hadits. Surabaya: Syirkah Bungkul Indah, 1985.

Beaman, Lori G., and Solange Lefebvre. “Critique of Religion in Public Commissions on Cultural and Religious Diversity.†In A Constructive Critique of Religion: Encounters between Christianity, Islam and Non-Religion in Secular Societies, edited by Mia Lövheim and Mikael Stenmark, 1st ed., 13. London, 2020.

Beaman, Lori G., and Cory Steele. “Living Well Together: Nonreligion in the Context of Religious Diversity.†Secular Studies 3, no. 1 (April 26, 2021): 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/25892525-bja10015.

Djazuli, A. Fiqh Jinayah (Upaya Menanggulangi Kejahatan Dalam Islam). 2nd ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000.

Enstedt, Daniel. “Understanding Religious Apostasy, Disaffiliation, and Islam in Contemporary Sweden.†In Moving In and Out of Islam. University of Texas Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.7560/317471-004.

Ghazali, Abd Moqsith. Argumen Pluralisme Agama: Membangun Toleransi Berbasis Al-Qur’an. Depok: Katakita, 2009.

Joseph, A. L. R. “Unfettered Religious Freedom Hangs by the Thread of Minority Dissent in Malaysia: A Review of the Dissenting Judgment of the Federal Court in the Lina Joy Case.†Review of Constitutional Studies, 2009, 205. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/revicos14&id=209&div=&collection=.

Kamarudin, Kamarudin, and Sabil Mokodenseho. “A Debate on the Islamic Practice of Pilgrimage to the Grave: Study of the Hadīth on Grave Pilgrimage for Women.†AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 6, no. 2 (August 9, 2022): 495–510. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i2.4390.

Khallaf, Abdul Wahhab. ‘Ilmu Ushul Al-Fiqh. al-Azhar: Maktabah al-Dakwah al-Islamiyah Syabab al-Azhar, n.d.

Manzur, Jamal al-Din Muhammad ibn Makram ibn. Lisan Al-‘Arab. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turas al-‘Arabi, 1999.

Mohamad, Maznah. “Making Majority, Undoing Family: Law, Religion and the Islamization of the State in Malaysia.†Economy and Society 39, no. 3 (August 1, 2010): 360–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2010.486218.

Momani, Bessma. “By Granting Asylum to Saudi Woman, Canada Shows Its Moral Leadership.†Centre for International Governance Innovation, 2019. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/granting-asylum-saudi-woman-canada-shows-its-moral-leadership/?utm_source=cigi_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=how-will-brexit-impact-canada.

Moqsith, Abd. “An Exegesis on Apostasy Law in Islam.†Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 13, no. 2 (2013): 283–94. https://doi.org/10.15408/AJIS.V13I2.940.

Moustafa, Tamir. “Liberal Rights versus Islamic Law? The Construction of a Binary in Malaysian Politics.†Law & Society Review 47, no. 4 (December 2013): 771–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12045.

Munawwir, Ahmad Warson. Kamus Al-Munawwir. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Pondok Pesantren Krapyek, 1995.

Nawawi, Imam. Al-Majmu’: Syarah Al Muhadzdzab. Jeddah: Maktabah Al-Irsyad, n.d.

Nixon, Alan G. “‘Non-Religion’ as Part of the ‘Religion’ Category in International Human Rights.†Religions 11, no. 2 (February 10, 2020): 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11020079.

———. “The Case of Non-Religious Asylum Seekers.†Journal for the Academic Study of Religion 31, no. 2 (2018): 113–48.

“Pindah Agama, Wanita Sudan Divonis Mati - BBC News Indonesia.†Accessed June 1, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia/2014/05/140515_sudan_murtad_hukum.

“Pria Arab Saudi Segera Dieksekusi Karena Murtad Jadi Ateis.†Accessed June 1, 2023. https://internasional.kompas.com/read/2017/04/27/11300001/pria.arab.saudi.segera.dieksekusi.karena.murtad.jadi.ateis?page=2.

Rahman, Fatchur. Ikhtishar Musthalahul Hadits. Bandung: Al-Ma’arif, 1974.

Sa’id, Jawdat. La Ikrah Fi Al-Din: Dirasah Wa Abhath Fi Al-Fikr Al-Islami. Damaskus: al-‘Ilm wa al-Salam li al-Dirasah wa al Nashr, 1997.

Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqh Al-Sunnah. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi, 1397.

Shihab, Muhammad Quraish. “Wawasan Al-Qur’an Tentang Kebebasan Beragama.†In Passing Over: Melintasi Batas Agama, edited by Komaruddin Hidayat and Ahmad Gaus, 190. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1998.

“Siapakah Rahaf Mohammed Al-Qunun, Perempuan Arab Saudi Yang Kabur Dari Keluarganya, Mengaku Murtad Dan Mencari Suaka?†Accessed June 1, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-46788996.

Solomon, Hussein, and Simone Bekker. “Exploring the Nexus between Democratisation, Authoritarianism and Patriarchy in Iran and Saudi Arabia.†In Politics of Change in Middle East and North Africa since Arab Spring, 33–53. London: Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003365334-3.

Taimiyah, Ibn. Majmu’ Al-Fatawa. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1980.

———. Majmu` Al-Fatawa. Mesir: Daarul Wafa, n.d.

Tenai, Noah K. “Religious Extremism: The Case of Sudan’s Mariam Yahya Ibrahim Ishag.†Verbum et Ecclesia 37, no. 1 (March 31, 2016): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v37i1.1511.

Unais, Ibrahim. Mu’jam Al-Wasith. Ihya al-Turas al-Arabi, 1972.

Wahyudi, Arif. “Analisa Terhadap Hadis-Hadis Hukuman Mati Bagi Orang Murtad Dalam Kitab Kutub Al-Sittah.†UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2005.

Wizaratul al-Awqaf Kuwaitiyyah. Al-Mausu’atul Fiqhiyyah Al-Kuwaitiyyah. Edited by 22. Kuwait: Wizaratu al-Auqaf wa al-Syu’un al-Islamiyyah, 2007.

Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa `Adillatuhu. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1996.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-03

How to Cite

Muttaqin, Z., Sarib, S., Husain, H., Rahman, R., Rohmah, S., & Mokodenseho, S. (2024). Religious Conversion in Hadith and the Discourse of Muslim Scholars. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 8(2), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i2.7576

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).