Problem Pemaknaan Al-Quran Dalam Metode Tafsir Konvensional

Authors

  • Irham Irham Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i1.3647

Keywords:

interpretation method, deviation of meaning, traditional interpretation, conventional interpretation, contemporary interpretation

Abstract

Problems with the Meaning of the Al-Quran in Conventional Interpretation Methods

This article explores the deviations in meaning in the interpretation of the Qur'an resulting from the use of conventional methods of interpretation, and what causes these deviations. This study is a literature review using descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that the interpretation resulting from the use of conventional interpretation methods has causes that make the results of the interpretation of the Koran deviate. There are two categories of causes, namely; underlying causes and specific causes. The basic cause of the deviation occurs because the requirements and standards for interpretation are not fulfilled optimally and consistently. The causes specifically for these deviations are related to the factors of interpretation deviation in the al-ma'tsur, al-ra'yu and al-isyari approaches. Knowledge of the causes of deviations in the meaning of the Qur'an can be a separate part of conventional interpretation methods

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“Adakah Makna Dalam Teks Alquran?†Caknurian Urban Sufism, 9 April 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jbHhM5rtgw&list=PL_2YM2IkUlvRaNGcL_KTjV_obiqkxlHc_&index=26.

Ahmad, Muhammad bin. “al-Dakhil Fi Tafsir al-Qis}s}as}u al-Qur’ani.†Disertation, Jami‘ah Abu Bakr Bilqayidi, 2015.

Akbar, Ali. “Towards a Humanistic Approach to the Quran: New Direction in Contemporary Islamic Thought.†Culture and Religion 20, no. 1 (2 Januari 2019): 82–103. doi:10.1080/14755610.2018.1532919.

Ali Humayun Akhtar. “Identifying Mysticism in Early Esoteric Scriptural Hermeneutics: Sahl al-Tustarī’s (d. 283/896) Tafsīr Reconsidered.†Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies 2, no. 2 (2017): 38–52. doi:10.2979/jims.2.2.02.

Amrizal, Amrizal. “Dimensi Ontologis-Etis Konsepsi Ketuhanan Islam: Analisis Hermeneutika Sintetis-Logis Fazlur Rahman dan al-ṬabÄá¹­abÄ’ī.†ILMU USHULUDDIN 6, no. 1 (31 Desember 2019): 1–22. doi:10.15408/iu.v6i1.13255.

Amrullah Hafizh, Azhar. “Dakhîl al-Isrâ’ilîyât Kisah Nabi Yûsuf dalam al-Jâmi‘ li Ahkâm al-Qur’ân Karya al-Qurtubî.†MUTAWATIR 5, no. 1 (10 September 2015): 116–41. doi:10.15642/mutawatir.2015.5.1.116-141.

‘Aqil, Baha’ al-Din ‘Abd Allah bin. Sharh Ibn ‘Aqil. 20 ed. Kairo: Dar al-Turath, 1980.

Dhahabi, Muhammad Husain al-. al-Dhahabi, al-Ittijahat al-Munharifah Fi Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim Dawafi‘uha Wa Daf ‘uha. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1986.

———. Al-Israiliyyat fi al-Tafsir wa al-H{adith. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, t.t.

Fauzi, Ahmad. “Problema Qirâ’ât Dalam Al-Qur’an Perspekstif Muḥammad Shaḥrûr.†Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 20, no. 1 (20 Oktober 2019): 81. doi:10.14421/qh.2019.2001-05.

Fischbach, Rahel. “Rereading the Qur’Än and Challenging Traditional Authority: Political Implications of Qur’Än Hermeneutics.†The Journal of the Middle East and Africa 8, no. 1 (2 Januari 2017): 1–21. doi:10.1080/21520844.2017.1289327.

Haq, Sansan Ziaul. “Hermeneutika Sufistik: Telaah Epistemologi Takwil Ibn ‘Arabi.†Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir 4, no. 1 (27 Juli 2019): 1–25. doi:10.32505/tibyan.v4i1.890.

Harun, Salman. Mutiara Al-Qur’an Menerapkan Nilai-Nilai Kitab Suci Dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari. 1 ed. Jakarta: Qaf, 2016.

Jayana, Thoriq Aziz. “Model Interpretasi Alquran dalam Pendekatan Tafsir Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed.†AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 3, no. 1 (27 Mei 2019): 37. doi:10.29240/alquds.v3i1.612.

Khalaf, Abd al-Wahab. Khulas}ah Tarikh Al-Tashri‘ al-Islami. Kuwait: Maktabah Dar al-Qalam, t.t.

Kisworo, Budi, dan H. Hardivizon. “Telaah Leksikal, Gramatikal, dan Kontekstual Terhadap Makna Kata Syahida pada QS. al-Baqarah ayat 185.†AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 4, no. 1 (2020): 163–80. doi:10.29240/alquds.v4i1.1473.

“Kritik Sukidi Terhadap Nalar Pembaruan Islam Cak Nur,†1 April 2021. https://ibtimes.id/sukidi/.

Lufaefi, Lufaefi. “Jumping Conlusion Tafsir: Penyimpangan Ayat-Ayat Khilafah HTI dalam Kitab Daulah Islamiyyah.†SANGKéP: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan 2, no. 2 (25 Juli 2019): 139–50. doi:10.20414/sangkep.v2i2.802.

Maryam, Shofa. “Ad-DakhÄ«l dalam Tafsir Al-JÄmi‘ li AhkÄm Al-Qur’Än Karya al-QurtubÄ«: Analisis Tafsir Surah al-Baqarah.†Suhuf 6, no. 2 (2013): 271–94.

Maulana, Muhammad Erpian. “DakhÄ«l Al-Naqli Kisah Nabi Ayyub Pada Tafsir Al-Qur’Än Al-‘Azim Karya Ibnu Kathir.†Al-Bayan Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (2019): 146–56.

Mursyid, Ali, dan Zidna Khaira Amalia. “Benarkah Yusuf dan Zulaikha Menikah? Analisa Riwayat Isra’iliyyat dalam Kitab Tafsir.†Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya 1, no. 1 (3 Februari 2016): 94–115. doi:10.15575/jw.v1i1.581.

Mustaqim, Abdul. “Teori Hudûd Muhammad Syahrur dan Kontribusinya dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.†AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 1, no. 1 (27 Juni 2017): 1–26. doi:10.29240/alquds.v1i1.163.

Qathttan, Manna‘ Khalil al-. Mabahith fi ‘ulum al-Qur’an. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, t.t.

———. Tarikh al-Tashri‘ al-Islami al-Tashri‘ wa al-Fiqh. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Ma‘arif, 1996.

Rahman, Yusuf. “Theological And Polemical Reception On Western Scholarship In Al-Qur’Än And TafsÄ«r Studies In Indonesia.†Jurnal Ushuluddin 27, no. 1 (30 Juli 2019): 1. doi:10.24014/jush.v27i1.5184.

Shalih, ‘Abd al-Qadir Muhammad. al-Tafsir wa al-Mufassirun fi al-‘Ashr al-Hadits. Baerut Lebanon: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, 2003.

Saeed, Abdullah. Interpreting The Qur’an Toward a Contemporary Approach. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.

Shan‘anī, Muhammad ibn Isma‘īl al-. Muhammad ibn Isma‘īl al-Shan‘anī, Irshad al-Nuqad Ila al-Taisīr al-Ijtihad. Kuwait: Al-Dar al-Salafiyyah, 1405.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir: Syarat, Ketentuan, dan Aturan yang Patut Anda Ketahui dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat al-Qur’an. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2013.

———. Tafsir Al Mishbah Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian AL Quran. 1 ed. Vol. 15. Jakarta, 2003.

Sukidi, Mulyadi. “The Gradual Qur’Än: Views of Early Muslim Commentators.†Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University, 2019. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42029833.

Zamkhshary, Abi al-Qasim Mahmud bin Umar al-. Al-Kashshaf. 6 vol. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Abikan, 1998.

Ziaul Haq, Sansan. Dimensi Eksoteris Dalam Tafsir Ishari Studi Atas Metode Tafsir al-Jilani. 1 ed. Tangerang Selatan: Cinta Buku Media, 2016.

———. “Eksoterisme Tafsir Ishari: Telaah Epistemologi Tafsir Al-Jilani.†Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 5, no. 1 (2016): 1–28.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-30

How to Cite

Irham, I. (2022). Problem Pemaknaan Al-Quran Dalam Metode Tafsir Konvensional. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 6(1), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i1.3647

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).