Dari Sejarah ke Studi Hadis: Memahami Metode Sejarah Kritis dan Penanggalan Hadis di Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v5i2.2611Keywords:
history, historical critical methods, hadith, hadith study, dating hadithAbstract
From History to Hadith Studies: Understanding Critical Historical Methods and Dating Hadith in the West
This article describes the historical research method implemented by hadith scholars in the West. Since Ignaz Goldziher developed Aloys Sprenger’s idea, scholars of hadith in the West have always based their studies on critical historical methods to formulate various methods of dating hadith as a source of historical reconstruction in the early periods of Islamic development. The reality of hadith studies in the West based on research methodology in the historical discipline has not yet received the attention of Muslim scholars, not least in Indonesia, which provides a critical review of the results of studies in the West. Instead of proposing a critique from a compatible paradigm, the arguments put forward are often based on assumptions that originate in the tradition of traditional hadith criticism. This article examines literature sources using a qualitative method and a narrative approach. Starting from the description of the formation and development of historical science in Europe, this article shows how the historical method was used by scholars of Islamic studies in the West to formulate four types of methods of dating hadith. The application of one or more of these methods in the study of hadith involves considering its suitability with the sources' characteristics. However, Muslim scholars’ involvement in the discourse of hadith studies in the West undoubtedly departs from the paradigm, theory, and method of historical research
Downloads
References
al-Siba’i, Mustafa. Al-Sunna Wa Makanatuha Fi Tasyri’ Al-Islami. Bairut: Dar al-Warraq al-Maktab al-Islami, 2000.
al-Suyuti, Jalal al-Din. Tadrib Al-Rawi Fi Syarh Taqrib Al-Nawawi. Bayrut: Dar a-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyat, 1996.
Amin, Kamaruddin. “Muslim Western Scholarship of Hadith and Western Scholar Reaction: A Study on Fuat Sezgin’s Approach to Hadith Scholarship.†Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 46, no. 2 (August 26, 2008): 253–77. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2008.462.253-277.
———. “The Reliability of The Traditional Science of Hadith: A Critical Reconsideration.†Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 43, no. 2 (August 3, 2005): 255–81. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2005.432.255-281.
Anusantari, Inama. “Perspektif Orientalis Dalam Mengkaji Hadits Dan Bantahan Kaum Muslim: Perspektif Ignaz Goldziher, Joseph Franz Schacht Dan Mustafa Azami.†RIWAYAH 6, no. 1 (2020): 103–24. https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/riwayah/article/view/6749/pdf.
Berg, Herbert. The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2000.
Brown, Daniel W. “Western Hadith Studies.†In The Wiley Blackwell Concise Companion to the Hadith, edited by Daniel W. Brown, 39–56. Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2020.
Brown, Jonathan A.C. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. Oxford: Oneworld Publication, 2011.
Buskens, Léon, and Annemarie van Sandwijk, eds. Islamic Studies in the Twenty-First Century. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2016.
Creswell, John W. Qualitative Inquriry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Second Edition). London: Sage Publications Inc., 2007.
Dabashi, Hamid. Post-Orientalisme: Knowledge and Power in Time of Terror. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2009.
Florida, Nancy K. Writing the Past, Inscribing the Future: History as Prophesy in Colonial Java. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 1995.
Goff, Jacques Le. Must We Devide History Into Periods?, Terj. M.B. Deevoise. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.
Goldziher, Ignaz. Muslim Studies (Muhammedanische Studien) Volume Two, Terj. C. R. Barber Dan S. M. Stern. Edited by S. M. Stern. New York: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1971.
Gottschalk, Louis. Understanding History: A Primer of Historical Method. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969.
Hallaq, Wael B. “The Authenticity of Prophetic Hadith: A Pseudo-Problem.†Studia Islamica, no. 89 (October 25, 1999): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1596086.
Hamim, Thoha. “Menguji Autentisitas Akademik Orientalis Dalam Studi Islam.†Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam 3, no. 2 (2013): 410–35. http://jurnalfuf.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/teosofi/article/view/36/33.
Idri. Problematika Autentisitas Hadis Nabi Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
Jordanova, Ludmilla. History in Practice: Second Edition. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.
Jung, Dietrich. “Islamic Studies and Religious Reform. Ignaz Goldziher – A Crossroads of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.†Der Islam 90, no. 1 (April 1, 2013): 106–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/islam-2013-0005.
Juynboll, G. H. A. Muslim Tradition: Studies in Chronology, Provenance, an Authorship of Early Hadith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Juynboll, G.H.A. Encyclopedia of Canonical Hadith. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007.
Kartodirdjo, Sartono. Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial Dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak, 2016.
Kuntowijoyo. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Bandung: Bentang, 2005.
Law, David R. The Historical-Critical Method: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: T & T Clark International, 2012.
Kisworo, B., & Hardivizon, H. (2020). Telaah Leksikal, Gramatikal, dan Kontekstual Terhadap Makna Kata Syahida pada QS. al-Baqarah ayat 185. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 4(1), 163-180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v4i1.1473
Masrur, Ali. “Diskursus Metodologi Studi Hadis Kontemporer Analisa Komparatif Antara Pendekatan Tradisional Dan Pendekatan Revisionis.†Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 1, no. 2 (2012): 237–49. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/journal-of-quran-and-hadith/article/view/1326/1179.
Minhaji, Akh. “The Response of Some Scholar To Joseph Schacht’s Thesis Regarding The Authenticity of Tradition.†UNISIA 13, no. Tahun XIII Triwulan 2 1992 (1992): 109–26. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Unisia/article/view/5518/4881.
Motzki, Harald. “Dating Muslim Traditions: A Survey.†Arabica 52, no. 2 (2005): 204–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/1570058053640349.
———. “The Prophet and the Debtors. A HÌ£adÄ«th Analysis under Scrutiny.†In Analysing Muslim Traditions: Studies in Legal, Exegetical and MaghÄzÄ« HÌ£adÄ«th, 125–208. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010.
———. “The Question of the Autheticity of Muslim Traditions Reconsidered: A Review Article.†In Method and Theory in the Study of Islamic Origins, edited by Herbert Berg, 211–57. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2003.
———. “Theme Issue: Methods of Dating Early Legal Traditions - Introduction.†Islamic Law and Society 19, no. 1–2 (2012): 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156851912X611248.
Munandar, Munandar. “Sanggahan Atas Teori Ingkar As-Sunnah Joseph Schacht.†Shahih (Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam) 1, no. 1 (2018): 47–57. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/shahih/article/view/1897.
Munslow, Alun. Deconstructing History. New York: Routledge, 1997.
Powers, David S. “The Will of Sa’d b. Abî Waqqâṣ: A Reassessment.†Studia Islamica, no. 58 (February 25, 1983): 33–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/1595341.
Reinhart, A Kevin. “Juynbolliana, Gradualism, the Big Bang, and Ḥadīth Study in the Twenty-First Century.†Edited by G H A Juynboll, Jonathan Brown, Recep Senturk, Jonathan A C Brown, and Aisha Y Musa. Journal of the American Oriental Society 130, no. 3 (2010): 413–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23044959.
Schacht, Joseph. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
Silverstein, Adam J. Islamic History: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Speight, R Marston. “The Will of Sa’d b. a. WaqqÄÅŸ: The Growth of a Tradition.†Der Islam 50, no. 2 (1973): 249–67. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/islm.1973.50.2.249.
Suadi, Hasan. “Menyoal Kritik Sanad Joseph Schacht.†RIWAYAH 2, no. 1 (2016): 86–101. https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/riwayah/article/view/1622/pdf.
Tujang, Bisri. “Eksistensi A Common Link Dalam Sanad Hadis Studi Kritik Terhadap Teori Joseph Schacht.†Al-Majaalis 3, no. 1 (2015): 57–105. http://ejournal.stdiis.ac.id/index.php/Al-Majalis/article/view/32.
Versteegh, Kees. “Harald Motzki (1948-2019).†Hadis ve Siyer Araştırmaları/Hadīth and Sīra Studies 5, no. 2 (2019): 397–99.
Yaqub, Ali Mustafa. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2000.
Zuhri, Muh. “Perkembangan Kajian Hadis Kesarjanaan Barat.†Ulul Albab 16, no. 2 (2015): 215–34. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/ua.v16i2.3182.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Scopus
Sinta 
Address:
Al Quds Contact Info:
Hasep Saputra 