Bint Al-Shati’ Critical Thematic Method and the Difference with Others

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v5i1.2610

Keywords:

Bint al-Shaá¹­i', interpreter qualifications, classical interpretation, modern interpretation, critical thematic method, literary analysis

Abstract

Bint al-Shaṭi' is one of the few modern Muslim female figures who developed Islamic scholarship, especially interpretation of the Al-Qur'an. Issa J Boullata praised the Bint al-Shaṭi’ method as a modern interpretation method that has many advantages. The first objective is to identify the background and principles of the Bint al-Shati' method of interpretation. The second objective, to find the peculiarities and advantages of the method compared to others. The third objective is to find important things as a logical consequence of the method of interpretation. This study uses content analysis and comparison method. The author calls the Bint al-Shati' method the term critical thematic method, developed based on the weaknesses of the classical interpretation method. This method has its uniqueness even though it was adopted from the method of interpretation of Amin al-Khuli. The Bint al-Shati’ method, compared to several other methods, appears to be more complete and relatively more guarantees that the Qur'an is able to speak for itself. In the end, the principle of no synonym in the Bint al-Shati' method can strengthen the dictum of Abu Abbas Tsa'lab, can provide certainty about the stages of a legal process, and can strengthen certain theological understandings

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Bab, Ja`far Dikk. “Al-Manhaj Al-Lughawi Fi Al-Kitab.†In Al-Kitab Wa Al-Qur’an Qira’ah Mu`asirah, edited by M Shahrur. Damaskus: al-Ahali, 1992.

Al-Farmawi, Abd al-Hayy. Al-Bidayah Fi Tafsir Al-Maudui. Cairo: al-Arabiyah, 1977.

Al-Ghazali, Muhammad. Nahw Tafsîr Maudûi Li Suwar Al-Qur’an Al-Karîm. Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1996.

Al-Haydari, Kamal. Usul Al-Tafsir Wa Al-Ta’wil. Edited by Abd al-Rida Al-Iftikhary. Teheran: Satarah, 2012.

Al-Razi, Fakhr al-Din. Al-Tafsîr Al-Kabîr. Beirut: Dar al-Hilal, 1976.

Al-Saá¹­ibi, Ibn Musa. Al-Muwafaqat. Edited by Abd Al-Hamid. Cairo: Maktabah M Ali Sabih, 1969.

Al-Zamakhshari, Ibn Umar. Al-Kashshaf ’an Haqaiq Al-Tanzil Wa ’Uyun Al-Aqawil Fi Wujuh Al-Ta’wil. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub, n.d.

Amin, Muhammad. “A Study of Bint Al-Shati Exegesis.†McGill University, 1992.

Bint al-Shati’, Aishah Abd Rahman. Al-Qur’an Wa Al-Tafsir Al-Asry. Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1970.

———. Al-Tafsir Al-Bayani Li Al-Qu’an Al-Karim. I. Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1990.

———. Al-Tafsir Al-Bayani Lil Al-Qur’an Al-Karim. II. Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1968.

———. Maqâl Fi Al-Insân Dirâsah Qur’aniyah. Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1969.

Boullata, Issa J. “Modern Qur’anic Exegesis: A Study of Bint Al-Shati’s Method.†The Muslim World LXIV, no. 4 (1974): 103–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1974.tb03145.x.

Denffer, Ahmad Von. Ulul Al-Qur’an: An Introduction to the Scoence of the Qur’an. London: The islamic Foundation, 2009.

Ismail, Maizul Imran &. “‘Āʼisha Bint Al-ShÄá¹­i’s Thoughts On TarÄduf And Their Implications For The IstinbÄá¹­ Of Law.†Al-Risalah 19, no. 2 (2019): 125–40. https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v19i2.459.

Izutsu, Toshihiko. Etika Bergama Dalam Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Firdaus, 1993.

Jannah, Miftahul. “Manusia Dalam Al-Qur’an (Studi Atas Kitab Maqâl Fî Al-Insân: Dirâsah Qur’aniyyah Karya ‘Â’Isyah ‘Abd Al-Rahman Bint Al-Syathi’).†Ilmu Ushuluddin 16, no. 2 (2017): 81–94.

Kafrawi, Shalahudin. “Methods Of Interpreting The Qur’Än: A Comparison Of Sayyid Quá¹­b And Bint Al-ShÄá¹­i.†Islamic Studies 37, no. 1 (1998): 3–17.

Kumi, Ahmad al-Sayyid and Muhammad Yusuf Qasim. Al-Tafsir Al-Maudu`i Li Al-Qur’an Al-Karim. 1st ed. Cairo, 1982.

Mardan. “Tafsir Karya Aisyah Abd Al-Rahman Bint Al-Syathi (Suatu Rekonstruksi Metodologi Tafsir Kontemporer).†Jurnal Adabiyah XI, no. 2 (2011): 166–81.

MD, Jarot Wahyudi. “Literary Interpretation Of The Qur’Än: ‘FawÄá¹£il Al-Ä€yÄt,’ ‘Qasam’ And "IstifhÄm, ‘ Three Examples From Bint Al-ShÄá¹­i’s ‘TafsÄ«r.’†Islamic Studies 37, no. 1 (1998): 19–28.

Mustaqim, Abdul. “Teori Hudûd Muhammad Syahrur Dan Kontribusinya Dalam Penafsiran Alquran.†Al-Quds Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 1, no. 1 (2017): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v1i1.163.

Naguib, Shuruq. “Bint Al-Shati’’s Approach to Tafsir: An Egyptian Exegete’s Journey from Hermeneutics to Humanity (Review).†Journal of Qur’anic Studies 17, no. 1 (2015): 45–84. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2015.0179.

Parninsih, Muhammad Alwi; Iin. “Menyoal Konsistensi Metode Penafsiran Bint Syathi Tentang Manusia (Studi Kitab Maqal Fi Al-InsÄn: Dirasah Qur’aniyyah).†Al-Bayan: Studi Al-Qur‟an DanTafsir 4, no. 2 (2019): 82–92.

Rahman, Fazlur. Major Themes of the Qur’an. Chicago: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1980.

Ramadhani, Wali. “Bintu Syati’ Dan Penafsirannya Terhadap Surah Al-‘Asr Dalam Kitab At-Tafsir Al-Bayani Lil Qur’anil Karim.†Jurnal At-Tibyan 3, no. 2 (2018): 265–81. https://doi.org/10.32505/tibyan.v3i2.717.

Roded, Ruth. “Bint Al-Shati’s Wives of the Prophet: Feminist or Feminine.†British Journal of Middle Eastern 33, no. 1 (2006): 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530190600603915.

Shahrur, Muhammad. Al-Kitab Wa Al-Qur’an Qira’ah Mu`asirah. Damaskus: al-Ahali, 1992.

Shaltut, Mahmud. Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Karîm. Cairo: Dar al-Qalam, n.d.

Shihab, Quraish. Membumikan Al-Qur’an. Bandung: Mizan, 1997.

Soleh, Achmad Khudori. Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer. Edited by Achmad Khudori Soleh. Yogyakarta: Jendela, 2003.

Syamsuddin, Sahiron. “An Examination of Bint Al-Shati"s Method of Interpreting the Qur’an.†McGill University, 1998.

Wahyuddin. “Corak Dan Metode Tafsir Bint Al-Shati’ Studi Atas Al-Tafsir Al-Bayaniy Li Al-Qur’an Al-Karim.†Epistemé 9, no. 1 (2014): 117–38.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-30

How to Cite

Soleh, A. K. (2021). Bint Al-Shati’ Critical Thematic Method and the Difference with Others. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 5(1), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v5i1.2610

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check