Abrogation Without Replacement in the Qur’an: Rethinking al-Tadarruj fi al-Tashrī‘

Authors

  • Siti Aisyah Chalik Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
  • Hardivizon Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia
  • Sri Wahyuni Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v9i2.14364

Keywords:

Nasakh, Qur’anic Abrogation, al-tadarruj fi al-tashri’, Gradual Legislation, Islamic Law

Abstract

This article critically examines the concept of nasakh (abrogation) in the Qur’an, with a particular focus on cases where a ruling is interpreted as being abrogated without a clearly defined substitute (nasakh bilā badal). Rather than understanding such cases as definitive cancellations, this study proposes that they should be read through the framework of al-tadarruj fi al-tashrī‘ (gradual legislation), which conceives of legal revelation as a phased and pedagogical process aligned with the intellectual and spiritual development of the Muslim community. Using a qualitative library-based research design and critical content analysis, the article re-examines key verses—including Q.S. al-Mujādilah [58]:12–13, Q.S. al-Baqarah [2]:184–185, and Q.S. al-Nisā’ [4]:15—in their historical and exegetical contexts. The findings demonstrate that these transitions reflect deliberate stages of moral and legal formation rather than normative discontinuity. By foregrounding contextual, historical, and maqāṣid-based dimensions of revelation, the study advances a new interpretive model that reconceptualizes nasakh as part of a dynamic and purposive framework of legal development. This approach offers a crucial corrective to rigid classical classifications and contributes to contemporary Qur’anic studies by affirming the continued relevance of divine law in addressing shifting socio-historical realities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelnour, Mohammed Gamal. “The Qurʾān and the Bible: Abrogation (Naskh) or Confirmation (Taṣdīq)?” Religions 14, no. 7 (Juli 2023): 856. doi:10.3390/rel14070856.
‘Abduh, Muḥammad, dan Muḥammad Rashīd Riḍā. Tafsīr al-Manār. Beirut: Dar Al-Je`il, 1367.
Aidulsyah, Fachri. “The Paradigm of Al-Quran As The Main Element of Islamic Civilization.” Tsaqafah 16, no. 1 (18 Mei 2020): 127–46. doi:10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i1.3460.
Allahverdiha, Mohmmad Mahdi. “Critical Analysis of Orientalists’ Views on Abrogation, Based on the View of Allameh Tabātabā’ī in Al-Mizan (A Comparative Study of Blasher, Richard Bell, John Burton, Georges Sal, Noldeke, Goldziher, and Allameh Tabātabā’ī Views).” Quran and Religious Enlightenment, 2, no. 2 (February 20, 2022): 9–22. doi:10.30473/quran.2022.8096.
Al-Qattan, Manna’ Khalill. Mabāḥith fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risalah, 2006.
Al-Suyuti, Jalaluddin. Al-Itqān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2003.
Al-Zarqānī, Muhammad ’Abd al-’Adzīm. Manāhil al-‘Irfān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2001.
Arman, Arman. “Controversy of Nasakh wal Mansukh Theory According to Scholars: Studies on the Thought of Abdullah Ahmad An-Naim.” Alif Lam : Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 4, no. 1 (21 Agustus 2023): 63–73. doi:10.51700/aliflam.v4i1.486.
‘Asyur, Muhammad al-Tahir Ibn. Tafsir al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunisia: al-Dar al-Tunisiah li al-Nasyr, 1984.
Auda, Jasser. Maqasidi al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. London dan Washington: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2007.
Braun, Virginia, dan Victoria Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (1 Januari 2006): 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Bustamam, Risman, dan Hardivizon Hardivizon. “Implementing The Values Of Raḥmatan Li Al-‘Ālamīn Through Maqāṣid-Based Exegesis To Achieve Social Justice.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 33, no. 1 (1 Juni 2025): 1–21. doi:10.24014/Jush.v33i1.35703.
Esack, Farid. The Qur’an: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld, 2002.
Fadillah, Haris, dan M. Iqbal Irham. “Nasakh Pembentukan Elastisitas Hukum Islam.” Rayah Al-Islam 6, no. 2 (28 Oktober 2022): 261–77. doi:10.37274/rais.v6i2.575.
Fatoohi, Louay. Abrogation in the Qur’an and Islamic Law. New York: Routledge, 2012. doi:10.4324/9780203096208.
Fauzi, Fauzi. “The Principles for Ijtihâd in Response to the Contemporary Problems.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 42, no. 2 (17 Juli 2019): 281–99. doi:10.30821/miqot.v42i2.557.
Hallaq, Wael B. Sharī’a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Haneef, Sayed Sikandar. “Debate on Methodology of Renewing Muslim Law: A Search for a Synthetic Approach.” Global Jurist 10, no. 1 (26 Januari 2010). doi:10.2202/1934-2640.1343.
Husaynizadeh, Sayyid Abd Al-Rasul, dan Fatemeh Ahmadinezhad. “Semantics of Abrogation in Exegetical Narrations.” Qru’anic Reserches 28, no. 108 (November 22, 2023): 5–24. doi:10.22081/jqr.2023.65759.3678.
Irfanuddin, M., Abdul Muid N, dan Zakaria Husin Lubis. “Nâsikh Mansûkh Dan Implementasinya Dalam Tafsir Al-Qur`an Ul Majid An-Nūr Karya Muhammad Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy.” Bersatu: Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika 1, no. 3 (18 Mei 2023): 88–107. doi:10.51903/bersatu.v1i3.319.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Shari’ah Law: An Introduction. Kuala Lumpur: Ilmiah Publishers, 2008.
Khoiri, Shohib, Syed Mohammad Chaedar, Muhammad Yusry Affandy, dan Nusairah Binti Ramli. “Abrogation in the Quran: Perspectives of Jamal Al-Banna and Jasser Auda.” Maʿālim Al-Qurʾān Wa al-Sunnah 20, no. 1 (1 Juni 2024): 85–106. doi:10.33102/jmqs.v20i1.464.
Khotami, Ahmad Izzuddin, dan Masruhan. “Polemik Nasikh Mansukh Dalam QS. al-Nahl: 101: Relevansi Dan Kontekstualisasinya.” JADID: Journal of Quranic Studies and Islamic Communication 4, no. 02 (18 November 2024): 55–66. doi:10.33754/jadid.v4i02.903.
Mahmud, Basri, Muhammad Imran, Hardivizon Hardivizon, dan Muhammad Zakir Husain. “Facing the Challenges of Islamophobia: A Study on the Message of Peace in the Qur’an Through the Ma’na Cum Maghza Approach.” TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 24, no. 1 (30 Juni 2025): 279–317. doi:10.30631/tjd.v24i1.551.
Muhammad, Nashih, Eko Sariyekti, dan Sumarjoko Sumarjoko. “Reakatualisasi Nasakh Dalam Perspektif Sosiologis.” Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum 8, no. 1 (1 Mei 2022): 53–64. doi:10.32699/syariati.v8i1.2105.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary. New York: HarperOne, 2002.
Nurdin, Rahmat, dan Abdillah Abdillah. “Polemik Nasikh-Mansukh John Burton Dalam ‘The Collection of The Quran.’” PAPPASANG 5, no. 1 (24 Juni 2023): 1–11. doi:10.46870/jiat.v5i1.534.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2015.
Rafi, Muhammad. “Konsep Nasikh Wa Mansukh Menurut Syah Wali Allah Al-Dahlawi Dan Implementasinya.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Raushan Fikr 9, no. 2 (4 Agustus 2020): 112–29. doi:10.24090/jimrf.v9i2.4142.
Rahman, Andi. “Mempertanyakan Konsep Al-Naskh Dalam Alquran.” Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an 5, no. 1 (1 Januari 2009): 53–61. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jsq/article/view/4738.
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. London: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
Razi, Muhammad Fakhr al-Din al-. Tafsir al-Kabir wa Mafatih al-Ghaib. Beirut: Dâr Ihya’ al-Turats al-‘Arab, 1420.
Rofiq, Yusril Ainur. “Konsep Konsep Nasikh Mansukh Perspektif Ibnu Abi Hatim Dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Adzim Musnadan ‘an Rasulillah Wa Al-Shahabat Wa Al-Tabi’in.” Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir 3, no. 2 (31 Desember 2023): 240–55. doi:10.19109/jsq.v3i2.21498.
Sabrifha, Eli, dan Mochammad Novendri S. “Implikasi Konsep Naskh Dan Mansukh Terhadap Istimbat Hukum.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 16, no. 6 (23 Januari 2023): 2521–38. doi:10.35931/aq.v16i6.1840.
Shalahuddin, Shalahuddin. “Teori Naskh Mahmoud Muhammad Taha Dan Sumbangsihnya Bagi Pembaruan Hukum Islam Di Dunia Modern.” Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum 3, no. 2 (2015): 401–15. doi:10.14421/al-mazaahib.v3i2.2838.
Shofiyulloh, Shofiyulloh. “Penalaran Hukum Islam: Upaya Mensinergikan Al-Aslu Dan Al-Far’u.” Matan : Journal of Islam and Muslim Society 1, no. 1 (22 Oktober 2019): 11–29. doi:10.20884/1.matan.2019.1.1.1903.
Syaifulloh, Ahmad. “Nasikh Dan Mansukh: Langkah Ulama’ Dalam Memahami Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis.” Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial 1, no. 1 (1 April 2018): 107–27. https://ejournal.iaikhozin.ac.id/ojs/index.php/iklila/article/view/41.
Taher, Ali Dhaigham. “The Relationship of Abrogation between the Qur’an and the Sunnah.” (Humanities, Social and Applied Sciences) Misan Journal of Academic Studies 24, no. 54 (6 Juli 2025): 57–72. http://www.misan-jas.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/940.


Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

How to Cite

Chalik, S. A., Hardivizon, H., & Wahyuni, S. (2025). Abrogation Without Replacement in the Qur’an: Rethinking al-Tadarruj fi al-Tashrī‘ . AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 9(2), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v9i2.14364

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check