Discussing the Phenomenon of the Appointment of Judges in District Courts Regarding Interfaith Marriages from a Legal Logic Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i2.8185Keywords:
Interfaith marriage, judge appointment, legal logicAbstract
This research aims to determine the intent of legislation and the constitution regarding interfaith marriages in Indonesia, so that judges can have a deeper understanding of the existing legal intent rather than relying solely on subjective legal interpretations. Additionally, this study also examines the authority of judges in District Courts who play a role in the determination of interfaith marriages. This research is a qualitative-normative study that utilizes legal documents and literature review, including books, journals, reports, and other reliable sources, which are analyzed using legal logic reasoning. Based on the researcher’s findings, legal logic reasoning in interpreting legislation indicates that interfaith marriages are prohibited. This can be seen in the constitutional goals of Indonesia in the fourth paragraph of the 1945 Constitution, the Judiciary Power Law in Article 5 and Article 50. The constitutional goals serve as the foundation for every judge’s decision. Such decisions not only aim to achieve lasting peace and justice for the parties involved but also for society at large or the majority of the Muslim community in Indonesia. Therefore, interfaith marriages between Muslim women and non-Muslim men should not be permitted. Furthermore, according to Constitutional Court Decision Number 68/PUU-XII/2014, which states that interfaith marriages are closely related to religion, the authority to resolve interfaith marriage cases should be held by Religious Courts. This is in line with Article 49 of Law Number 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts, which specifies one of their authorities is related to marriage matters.
Downloads
References
Amalia, Tyas. “Model Manajemen Konflik Pernikahan Beda Agama Dalam Pemikiran Ahmad Nurcholish.†Jurnal Sosiologi Agama 12, no. 1 (2018): 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2018.121-01.
Ardianto, Medi Romi, and Ahmad Zamroni. “Implikasi Ketenangan Jiwa Dan Ketentraman Hati Sebagai Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Pendidikan Bagi Remaja.†IEMJ : Islamic Education Management Journal 1, no. 1 (February 2022): 20–35.
Bahruddin, A . “Implementasi Maqasid Al-Shari’ah Sebagai Solusi Problematika Sosial Dan Kemasyarakatan Kontemporer.†Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 17, no. 1 (June 2017): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJTIHAD.V17I1.1-18.
Bawazier, Dio Alif. “Pernikahan Beda Agama (Studi Komparatif Tentang Hukum Pernikahan Beda Agama Perspektif Abdullah Ahmad An-Na’im Dan Ahmad Zahro).†Sakina: Journal of Family Studies 4, no. 3 (2020).
Burhanuddin. “Zikir Dan Ketenangan Jiwa (Solusi Islam Mengatasi Kegelisahan Dan Kegalauan Jiwa).†Jurnal Mimbar: Media Intelektual Muslim Dan Bimbingan Rohani 6, no. 1 (April 2020): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.47435/MIMBAR.V6I1.371.
Direktori Putusan Mahkmah Agung (2022).
Fatoni, Siti Nur, and Iu Rusliana. “Pernikahan Beda Agama Menurut Tokoh Lintas Agama Di Kota Bandung†1 (2019): 95–114.
Fitrawati. “Diskursus Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia Dalam Tinjauan Universalisme Ham Dan Relativisme Budaya.†JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 20, no. 1 (June 2021): 131–45. https://doi.org/10.31958/JURIS.V20I1.2825.
Gunawan, Leo Agung Srie. “Problematika Jatuh Cinta : Sebuah Tinjuan Filosofis.†LOGOS 15, no. 2 (April 2018): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.54367/LOGOS.V15I2.319.
Harahap, Nursapia. “Penelitian Kualitatif,†2020.
Irfani, Nurfaqih. “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum.†Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 3 (2020): 305–25.
Isnantiana, Nur Iftitah. “Legal Reasoning Hakim Dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara Di Pengadilan.†Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 18, no. 2 (2017): 41–56.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. “Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia,†2015.
Jurdi, Fajlurrahman. Logika Hukum. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
Konstitusi, Mahkamah. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/PUU-XII/2014, Mahkmah Konstitusi § (2015).
Lathifah, Anthin. “State Marriage and Civil Marriage: The Role of State Policy on Interreligious Marriage in Central Java.†AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 15, no. 1 (June 2020): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.19105/AL-IHKAM.V15I1.2689.
Mahkamah Agung. “Putusan MA No. 1400 K/Pdt/1986.†Daniel S. Lev Library, 1986.
Maulidizen, Ahmad. “The Urgency of Islamic Law Sources Knowledge Masadir Al-Ahkam Al-Mukhtalaf Fiha: Istisab, Sadd Al-Dzariah and Qaul Al-Sahabi.†Jurnal Hukum Islam 18, no. 2 (2018): 49–68. https://doi.org/10.24014/hi.v18i2.6749.
Maulidizen, Ahmad, and Ashilah Raihanah. “The Technique of Determining Ijtihad and Its Application in Life: Analysis of Istihsan, Maslahah Mursalah, ‘Urf and Syar’u Man Qablana.†Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v4i1.1600.
Muzan, Amrul, Syamsuddin Muir, Hasan Basri, Kemas Muhammad Gemilang, and Darulhuda Darulhuda. “Mitigasi Konflik Rumah Tangga Dalam Upaya Menjaga Keutuhan Keluarga Sakinah.†Hukum Islam 22, no. 2 (2022): 52–72.
Nurcahaya, Mawardi Dalimunthe, and Srimurhayati. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.†Hukum Islam 18, no. 2 (August 2019): 141–56.
Nurmaya, Edyna Ratna. “Pernikahan Beda Agama Stafsus Jokowi: Ayu Dan Gerald Umumkan Lewat Instagram, Mohon Doa Dan Dukungan - Suara Merdeka.†Suara Merdeka, 2022.
Pengadilan Negeri Pati. Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung (2020).
Qamar, Nurul. Logika Dan Penalaran Dalam Ilmu Hukum. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 2018.
Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan. Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama (2006). dpr.go.id.
Rani Tiara S., Mega. “Diskursus Tentang Nikah Beda Agama (Kajian Al Maqasid As Syari’ah).†Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 8, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v8i1.351.
Reva Deddy Utama. “Catatan Demokrasi: Nikah Beda Agama Di Indonesia, Kok Bisa?,†2022.
Rohmah, Anny Nailatur, and Ashif Az Zafi. “Jejak Eksistensi Mazhab Syafi`i Di Indonesia.†Tamaddun: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Kebudayaan 8, no. 1 (May 2020).
Saputra, Andi. “PN Surabaya Izinkan Pernikahan Beda Agama Pasangan Islam-Kristen Ini.†Detik News, 2022.
Setiawan, Agus. “Penalaran Hukum Yang Mampu Mewujudkan Tujuan Hukum Secara Proporsional.†Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 3, no. 2 (December 2017): 204–15. https://doi.org/10.35194/JHMJ.V3I2.257.
Simatupang, Taufik Hidayat. “Adult Age in Marriage in Indonesia (Theoretical Study of the Application of the Lex Posterior Derogat Legi Priori Principle).†Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 2 (June 2021): 213–22. https://doi.org/10.30641/DEJURE.2021.V21.213-222.
Sri Wahyuni. “Kontroversi Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia.†Al-Risalah 14, no. 2 (2014): 293–306. https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v14i02.452.
Susanto, Mei. “Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945: Pembelajaran Dari Tren Global.†Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 2 (2021): 184–203.
Syaripudin, Ahmad, and M Kasim. “Konsep Dasar Ijmak Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam.†BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam 1, no. 1 (April 2020): 28–43. https://doi.org/10.36701/BUSTANUL.V1I1.125.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (2011).
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (n.d.).
Vera, Ni Luh Putu, and Nurul Ainuddin. “Logika Hukum Dan Terobosan Hukum Melalui Legal Reasoning.†Jatiswara 31, no. 1 (2016): 99–110.
Weruin, Urbanus Ura. “Logika, Penalaran, Dan Argumentasi Hukum.†Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 2 (November 2017): 374–95. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK1427.
Yunus, Ahyuni. Hukum Perkawinan Dan Itsbat Nikah: Antara Perlindungan Dan Kepastian Hukum. Humanities Genius, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg)
