Alternatives to Criminal Conviction in a Comparative Analysis of Positive Law and Islamic Criminal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4308Keywords:
Prison overcrowding, prison, alternative punishment, positive law, Islamic criminal lawAbstract
This paper aims to comprehensively analyze the concept of alternative punishment in a comparative study of positive law and Islamic criminal law. Currently, imprisonment is still the main choice, causing overcrowding in prisons in Indonesia. Sharp criticism and dissatisfaction with imprisonment have prompted the development of alternative punishments other than imprisonment that are in accordance with the purpose of punishment. This study is a type of qualitative research using data collection techniques through literature studies. The data used in this study was taken from secondary data from various literatures consisting of books, journals, mass media, news, social media related to alternative sentencing. The conclusion of this paper shows that in positive law, alternative provisions for punishment other than imprisonment have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and other laws and regulations, including in the form of fines (compensation), rehabilitation sanctions for narcotics abuse cases, and settlement of criminal cases outside the court (APS) by prioritizing the principle of restorative justice, namely peace and forgiveness, for the perpetrators, victims and the community. In positive law, alternative punishment has an ideal concept with the aim of sentencing that leads to recovery, not retaliation. This paper also concludes that in the concept of Islamic criminal law, the provision of alternative punishments contains the principles in maqashid sharia, namely in maintaining religion (al-dîn), soul (al-nafs), offspring (al-nasl), property (al-mâl) and reason (al-aql).
Downloads
References
Algra, N E. “Van Duyvendijk, Mula Hukum, Tej.†Simorangkir, Bandung: Bina Cipta, 1983.
Amdani, Yusi. “Konsep Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencurian Oleh Anak Berbasis Hukum Islam Dan Adat Aceh.†Al-’Adalah 13, no. 1 (2016): 76–81.
Andi, Hamzah. “Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana.†Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2008.
Apeldoorn, Van. “Pengantar Ilmu Hukum,†2001.
As-ShÄthibÄ«, Abu IshÄq. “Al-MuwÄfaqÄt FÄ« UÅŸÅ«l as-Syarī’ah.†Beirut: DÄr Al-Fikr, 2005.
Chazawi, Adami. “Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I, Stesel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana,†2002.
Fauzan, Fauzan, and Nasaruddin Umar. “Norma Pengecualian Dalam Pasal 8 Rancangan Undang-Undang Larangan Minuman Beralkohol (Analisis Fikih Jinayah Dan Ilmu Perundang-Undangan).†Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 22, no. 1 (2018): 131–44.
Hadjar, Ibnu. “Syari’at Islam dan Hukum Positif.†Al-Mawardi xvi (2006): 1–15.
Hiariej, Eddy O S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.
Hs, H Salim. “Perkembangan Teori Dalam Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta, PT.†Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
ICJR: Beban rutan dan lapas per Januari 2022 capai 223 persen. “Httpshttps://Www.Antaranews.Com/Berita/2687101/Icjr-Beban-Rutan-Dan-Lapas-per-Januari-2022-Capai-223-Persen,†n.d.
Irfan, H M Nurul. “Fiqh Jinayah.†Amzah, 2013.
Jahar, Asep Saepudin. Hukum Keluarga, Pidana & Bisnis. Prenada Media, 2013.
Jahroh, Siti. “Reaktualisasi Teori Hukuman Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam.†Jurnal Hukum Islam, 2016.
Kalianget, Reymond. “Eksistensi Pidana Denda Dalam Konteks Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.†Lex Crimen 4, no. 7 (2015).
Kania, Dede. “Pidana Penjara Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.†Yustisia 3 (2014): 19–28.
“Kelebihan Kapasitas Lapas Di Indonesia Bisa Mencapai 136 Persen Pada 2025.†Accessed March 28, 2022. https://www.infoindonesia.id/read/2022/03/17/13640/kelebihan-kapasitas-lapas-di-indonesia-bisa-mencapai-136-persen-pada-2025.
Kenedi, John. Buku Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.
Kristian, Kristian, and Christine Tanuwijaya. “Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dengan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 1, no. 2 (2017): 592–607.
Kunz, Karl-Ludwig. “Non-Custodial Sanctions in Europe: An Overview.†Acta Criminologica: African Journal of Criminology & Victimology 7, no. 1 (1994): 33–39.
Marpaung, Leden. “Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika.†Jakarta, 2005.
Muladi, Lembaga, and Pidana Bersyarat. “Bandung.†Alumni, 2008.
Mustafa, Ibrahim. “Dkk., Al-Mu’jam Al-Wasit.†Tahran: Al-Maktabah Al-‗ Ilmiyyah, t. Th, 1973.
Najemi, Andi, Kabib Nawawi, and Lilik Purwastuti. “Rehabilitasi Sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan Terhadap Anak Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Terhadap Anak.†Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora 4, no. 2 (2020): 440–54.
Nur, Efa Rodiah. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Sebagai Media Menuju Keadilan.†Masalah-Masalah Hukum 45, no. 2 (2016): 115–22.
Owens, Michael Leo, and Hannah L Walker. “The Civic Voluntarism of ‘Custodial Citizens’: Involuntary Criminal Justice Contact, Associational Life, and Political Participation.†Perspectives on Politics 16, no. 4 (2018): 990–1013.
Putra, Aan Riana Angkasa Aji, and Ningrum Puspita Sari. “Kendala Pemberian Pembebasan Bersyarat Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIa Sragen.†Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 2, no. 3 (2013).
Rumadan, Ismail. “Problem Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia Dan Reorientasi Tujuan Pemidanaan.†Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 2, no. 2 (2013): 263. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.263-276.
Rusdiana, Emmilia. “Pengenaan Pidana Denda Yang Dapat Dikonversi Dengan Pidana Kurungan Pada Pelaku Anak.†Jurnal Yudisial Vol 12, no. 3 (2019): 363–80.
Santoso, Topo. Membumikan Hukum Pidana Islam: Penegakan Syariat Dalam Wacana Dan Agenda. Gema Insani, 2003.
Sarbini, Ilyas, and Aman Ma’arij. “Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana.†Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 9, no. 1 (2020): 31–42.
Setyowati, Dewi. “Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice Sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan.†Pandecta Research Law Journal 15, no. 1 (2020): 121–41.
Syafiq, Ahmad. “Rekonstruksi Pemidanaan Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam (Perspektif Filsafat Hukum).†Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 2 (2014): 178–90.
Usman, Usman, Bahder Johan Nasution, and Elizabeth Seregar. “Over Kapasitas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Perespektif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana.†Wajah Hukum 4, no. 2 (2020): 436. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v4i2.256.
Wibowo, Padmono. “Pentingnya Mitigasi Risiko Dampak Kepenuhsesakan Pada Lapas Dan Rutan Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 2 (2020): 263–83.
Yulianti, Wulan Dwi. “Upaya Menanggulangi Over Kapasitas Pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia.†Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 2 (2020): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.32694/010980.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg)
