Development of the Shafi'iyyah Fiqh Thought Pattern and the Role of al-Nawawī as a Unifier

Authors

  • Helmi Imran Institut Agama Islam Al-Aziziyah Samalanga Bireuen Aceh, Indonesia
  • Karimuddin Abdullah Lawang Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Al-Aziziyah Samalanga Bireuen Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4233

Keywords:

Development, thought pattern, syāfi'iyyah fiqh, the role of al-Nawawī

Abstract

This study aims to find factors for the emergence and development of the Shafií School of legal thought and the role of al-NawawÄ« as a unifier of these thoughts. Legal thought in the Shafií school of thought at the beginning of the revival of the school was very diverse, so this also affected the legal analogy that developed between one region and another. This research is a qualitative research, in which the data were analyzed by using content analysis based on the text of the thoughts of the scholars. Based on the results of the study, it can be understood that the birth of various styles of thought in the Shafií school was caused by the different methods of thinking of the scholars from different regions in developing the Shafií school of thought, such as the areas of Iraq and Khurasan. Iraqi scholars prefer the riwÄyah method while Khurasan scholars prefer the dirÄyah method. In addition, each of these styles of thinking has advantages and disadvantages. The advantage of the Iraqi style is in the transmission of mazhab opinions and the rules of ijtihad, so that this style of thinking is considered stronger than Khurasan, while the Khurasan style lies in the systematic method of legal development, so that this style is considered better in legal development cases. The weakness of the Iraqi style of thought is in terms of takhrÄ«j and tafrī’ compared to the Khurasan style, while the Khurasan style is weak in terms of the accuracy of the transmission of opinions compared to the Iraqi style. This has inspired the scholars who lived afterward, such as al-NawawÄ« (d. 676 H) to initiate the unification of these styles of thought. Therefore, al-NawawÄ« is seen as the most representative of the Shafi'iyyah scholars in developing the Shafi'i school.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Asyqar, Umar SulaimÄn. Al-Madkhal IlÄ DirÄsah Al-MadÄris Wa Al-MadhÄhib Al-Fiqhiyyah. 2nd ed. Amman: DÄr al-NafÄ’is, 1998.

Al-MalÄ«bÄrÄ«, ‘Abd al-Baṣīr ibn SulaymÄn. DirÄsat Al-MawsÅ«Ê»ah Li IṣṭilÄḥÄt Al-SyÄfiÊ»iyyah. Amman: DÄr al-NÅ«r al-MubÄ«n, 2016.

Al-NawawÄ«, AbÅ« ZakariyyÄ MuḥyÄ« al-DÄ«n YaḥyÄ ibn Syarf. Al-Majmū‘ Syarḥ Al-Muhadhdhab, TaḥqÄ«q: Muḥammad NajÄ«b Al-Muṭīʻī. Beirut: DÄr IḥyÄ’ al-TurÄth al-‘ArabÄ«, 2001.

———. TahdhÄ«b Al-AsmÄ’ Wa Al-LughÄt, TaÊ»lÄ«q : Muṣṭafá ‘Abd Al-QÄdir ‘Aṭá. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 2007.

Al-NuÊ»aimÄ«, Abd al-QÄdir ibn Muḥammad. Al-DÄris FÄ« TÄrÄ«kh Al-MadÄris. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1990.

Al-QawÄsimÄ«, Akram YÅ«suf ‘Umar. Al-Madkhal IlÄ Madhhab Al-ImÄm Al-SyÄfi‘Ī. Amman: DÄr al-NafÄ’is, 2003.

Al-SubkÄ«, TaqÄ« al-DÄ«n ‘AlÄ« ibn ‘Abd al-KÄfÄ«. Takmilah Al-MajmÅ«Ê» Syarh Al-Muhadhdhab, TaḥqÄ«q: Muḥammad NajÄ«b Al-Muṭīʻī. Beirut: DÄr IḥyÄ’ al-TurÄth al-‘ArabÄ«, 2001.

Al-SuyÅ«á¹­Ä«, JalÄl al-DÄ«n. TÄrÄ«kh Al-KhulafÄ. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, n.d.

Al-TamÄ«mÄ«, ḤÄmid ‘Abd AllÄh al-MaḥlÄwÄ«. Muqaddimah, Dalam Ibn Al-MundhÄ«r, Muḥammad Ibn IbrÄhÄ«m Al-NaysabÅ«rÄ«, Al-Awsaá¹­ Fi Al-Sunan Wa Al-IjmÄÊ» Wa Al-IkhtilÄf. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 2012.

Arifah Jauhari Syams, "Melacak Masa Keemasan Fikih Pada Masa Empat Imam Madzhab", Al-Ahwal 5, No. 1 (2013): 91-101

BÄsyÄ, Aḥmad TÄ«mÅ«r. Naẓrat TÄrÄ«khiyyah FÄ« ḤudÅ«th Al-MadhÄhib Al-Fiqhiyyah Al-ArbaÊ»ah. Beirut: DÄr al-QÄrÄ«, 1990.

Bik, Muḥammad al-Khuá¸arÄ«. TÄrÄ«kh Tasyrī‘ Al-IslÄmÄ«. Singapura-Jeddah: al-Ḥaramain, n.d.

DÄ«b, Abd al-‘Aẓīm MaḥmÅ«d. Al-Madhhab Al Al-SyÄfiʻī Min Al-Ta’sÄ«s IlÄ Al-Istiqrà r. Bairut: DÄr al-MinhÄj, n.d.

Hakim, Ihsan Nul. “Pemikiran Ushul Fiqih Ibnu Qudamah: Kajian Atas Beberapa Masalah Fiqih Dalam Kitab Al-Kafi Fi Fiqh Al-Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal.†Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 1, no. 2 (2016): 81–102. https://doi.org/DOI : 10.29240/jhi.v1i1.76.

HÄ«tÅ«, Muḥammad Ḥasan. Al-IjtihÄd Wa ṬabaqÄt MujtahidÄ« Al-SyÄfiÊ»iyyah. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-RisÄlah, n.d.

Ibn al-SubkÄ«, TÄj al-DÄ«n ‘Abd al-WahhÄb ibn ‘AlÄ«. ṬabaqÄt Al-SyÄfiÊ»iyyah Al-KubrÄ, TaḥqÄ«q: MuṣṭafÄ â€˜Abd Al-QÄdir Aḥmad ‘Aá¹­Ä. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1999.

Ibn KathÄ«r, ImÄd al-DÄ«n IsmÄ‘īl ibn Umar. ṬabaqÄt Al-SyÄfi‘iyyah, TaḥqÄ«q: ‘Abd Al-Ḥafīẓ Manṣūr. NaghazÄ«: DÄr al-MadÄr al-IslÄmÄ«, 2002.

JaghÄ«m, Nu’mÄn. Madkhal IlÄ Madhhab Al-SyÄfiʻī; RijÄluh Wa Uṣūluh Wa Kutubuh Wa IṣṭilÄḥÄtuh. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2011.

Khair, Rizky Muktamirul. “Kedudukan Shalat Sunnah Qabliyyah Jumat Dalam Pemikiran Hukum ImÄm Al-NawawÄ«.†Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (2018): 107–32. https://doi.org/doi: 10.29240/jhi.v3i2.412,.

Maghribiyyah, Muḥammad Ṭariq Muḥammad HisyÄm. Al-Madhhab Al-SyÄfi‘ī: DirÄsah ‘an Aham MuṣṭalaḥÄtih Wa Asyhar Muá¹£annafÄtih Wa MarÄtib Al-Tarjīḥ FÄ«h. Damaskus: al-FÄrÅ«q, 2011.

Muḥammad AbÅ« Zahrah. TÄrÄ«kh Al-MadhÄhib Al-IslÄmiyyah; Fi Al-SiyÄsah Wa Al-‘AqÄ’Id Wa TÄrÄ«kh Al-MadhÄhib Al-Fiqhiyyah. Kairo: DÄr al-Fikr al-‘ArabÄ«, n.d.

Muḥammad, AlÄ« Jum‘ah. Al-Madkhal IlÄ DirÄsah Al-MadhÄhib Al-Fiqhiyyah. Kairo: DÄr al-SalÄm, 2012.

Muḥammad, AlÄ« JumÊ»ah. Al-ImÄm Al-SyÄfiʻī Wa Madrasatuh Al-Fiqhiyyah. Kairo: DÄr al-RisÄlah, 2004.

Rohidin, “Historitas Pemikiran Hukum Imam Asy-Syafi'i.†UISTUM: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 11 No 27 (2004), https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/download/4909/4346.

Zakirun Pohan. “Eksistensi Mazhab Fiqih Pada Zaman Kontemporer Sekarang.†Al-Ilmu 6, no. 1 (2021): 15–34.

Downloads

Published

23-05-2022

How to Cite

Imran, H., & Lawang, K. A. (2022). Development of the Shafi’iyyah Fiqh Thought Pattern and the Role of al-NawawÄ« as a Unifier. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(1 May), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4233

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)