Kesaksian Non Muslim dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Curup Nomor 571/Pdt. G/2016

Authors

  • Ahmad Nashoha Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN) Curup, Indonesia
  • Yusefri Yusefri Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, Indonesia
  • Sri Wihidayati Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v5i2.1837

Keywords:

Witness, non-Muslim, Judge's Decision, Maqashid al-Syari`ah

Abstract

The focus of the study of this article is on the Decision of the Curup Religious Court Judge number 571 / Pdt. G / 2016, which received testimony from non-Muslims. The classical fiqh scholars have formulated that Islam is one of the conditions that must be met in order to receive witnesses or testimony in a trial. As for the non-Muslim witnesses, the fiqh scholars have different opinions. Imam al-Syafi'i flatly rejected it. Other fiqh scholars, from the Hanafiah, Maliki and Hanabilah circles, accept non-Muslim testimonies in certain cases and circumstances. This article examines two issues, first, what the judges consider accepting non-Muslims as witnesses, and second; how is the view from the Maqâshid al-Syarî`ah side. These two problems were analyzed descriptively qualitatively, using the content analysis method and the Maqâshid al-Syarî`ah analysis approach. This article concludes: First, the judge's consideration of receiving non-Muslim testimony in the Curup Religious Court Judge's Decision number 571 / Pdt. G / 2016 is due to the absence of Muslim witnesses. Second, in the perspective of Maqâshid al-Syariah, the acceptance of testimony from non-Muslims in the absence of Muslim witnesses becomes a conditional need so that the case process can be resolved properly and fairly, lâ dharâra wala dhirâr, leading to the maintenance of the benefits of marriage. When Muslim witnesses are not found (absent), the testimony of non-Muslims can be categorized as the benefit of the hajiyat level. namely the level of benefit needed to provide convenience and eliminate difficulties in implementing legal provisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali Mutakin, “Hubungan Maqâshid al-Syarî’ah Dengan Metode Istinbtah Hukumâ€, Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman UIN Raden Intan Lampung Volume 17, Nomor 1, Juni 2017

Al-Mubarok, MD Somantri, “Kedudukan Saksi Non Muslim dalam Perkawinan Perspektif Hukum Islamâ€, Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cerebon, Vol.4 No. 2, 2019.

Anto Mutriady Lubis, “Kedudukan Saksi Non Muslim Dalam Pandangan Islam dan Kitab Undang Hukum Acara Perdata Seabagai Alat Bukti Berperkara di Pengadilan Agamaâ€, Doktrina:Journal of Law Universitas Medan Area Vol 1, No 2 Oktober 2018

Auffah Yumni, “Kemaslahatan Dalam Konsep Maqashid Al-Syariahâ€, Jurnal Tarbiyah UIN SU, Nizhamiyah, Vol. Vol. VI, No.2, Juli – Desember 2016

Ghofar Shidiq, “Teori Maqashid Al-Syari'ah Dalam Hukum Islamâ€, Jurnal UNISSULA, Majalah Ilmiah Sultan Agung, VOL. XLIV No. 118 Juni – Agustus 2009

M. Zaman, “Analisis Istihsan Atas Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Saksi Non Muslim Pada Perkara Perceraian.†AL-HUKAMA: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law , Volume 08, Nomor 02, Desember 2018

Zul Anwar Ajim Harahap, “Konsep Maqashid Al-Syariah Sebagai Dasar Penetapan dan Penerapan Dalam Hukum Islam Menurut ‘Uzzudin Bin ‘Abd Al-Salamâ€, Jurnal IAIN Padang Sidimpuan, Tazkir Vol. 9 No. Juli-Desember 2014

Al-Ómidî, Al-Ihkâm fî Ushûl al-Ahkâm (Beirût: al-Maktabat al-Islâmî, t.th

Abdul Manan, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Kencana, 2005

Abdul Rahman Ghozali, Fiqh Munakahat, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006

Amir Syarifudin, Garis-Garis Besar Fiqh, Jakarta: Kencana, 2003 hlm.

A. Mukti Arto, Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Peradilan Agama, cet. 3, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2000

Anshoruddin, Hukum Pembuktian Hukuam Acara Islam dan Hukum Positif, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004

Asafri Jaya Bakri, Konsep Maqashid al_syari’ah menurut al-syatibi, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo, 1996

A.Warson Moenawwir, Al-Munawir, Kamus Arab–Indonesia, Surabaya: Pustaka; Progresif, 2002

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2001

Al-Ghazâlî, Al-Mustashfa min ‘Ilm Ushul, ttp. Maktabah al-Jadidah, t.th

Ibn al-Human, Syarah Fath al-QÄdir, Mesir : Musá¹­hafa al-Bab al-Halabi, 1970

Ibn Manzhûr, Lisân al-‘Arab, Beirût: Dâr al-Shadr, 1414 H

Ibn Rusyd, Bidayatul Mujtahid, Semarang: Asy-Syifa, 1990

Ibrahim Mustafa, al-Mu’jam al-Wasith, Istanbul: al-Maktabah al-Islamiyyah, 1999

Ibn Qayyim Al-Jauziyah, I’lam al-Muwaqiin ‘an rabb al-alamin, Beirut: DÄr al-Jail, t.t

Mahalli, QalyubÄ© wa ‘Umairah, Riyad : Maktabah ar-Riyaá¸li al-Hadiá¹­á¹£ah, th

Mahmud Syaltut dan Syaikh Al-Sayis, Muqaraanah al Mazahib fi al-Fiqh, Maktabah Muhammad Ali Subhi Wa Auladah Bi Al-Azhar, 1953

Al-QasimÄ©, TafsÄ©r al-QasimÄ©, Mesir :DÄr al-IhyÄ’ al-KutÅ«b al’ArÄbiyah, th

Salam Madkur, Muhamad, al-Qadha fi al-Islam, DÄr al Nadhah al-‘Arabiyah, t.t,

Subekti, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, cet. 24, Jakarta: Intermasa, 1992

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006

Al-Suyuti, al-Ashbah wa al-Naza’ir, Beirut: Dâr al-Kutub al-I’lmiyah, 1990

Al-Syafi’i, al-Umm, Beirut-Libanon: DÄr al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1998

Al-Syâthibi, Al-Muwafaqât fî Ushûl al-Ahkâm tt:Dâr al-Fikr, tth

Syihabuddin Ahmad al-Qalyubi, Hasyiyat Qulyubi Wa Umairoh Ala Syarah Al-Mahalli, Riyad : Maktabah ar-Riyadh al-Haditsah, th

Repositori.uin-alauddin.ac.id. Penelitian berjudul “Kesaksian Non Muslim Dalam Pandangan Hukum Islamâ€

Repository.uin-suska.ac.id. Penelitian berjudul “Eksistensi Saksi Non Muslim Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan di Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2020

How to Cite

Nashoha, A., Yusefri, Y., & Wihidayati, S. (2020). Kesaksian Non Muslim dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Curup Nomor 571/Pdt. G/2016. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(2 November), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v5i2.1837

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check