Regulatory Gaps in Digital Witness Protection for Cybercrime: Integrating International Standards, Egyptian Law, and Islamic Jurisprudence

Tarek El Sayed Mahmod; Khalid awad hammadi Al –Alwani; Ismael Hellawss; Mahmood Shaker Alaloosh; Salah Ragab Fathelbab

doi:10.29240/jhi.v11i1.16326

Authors

Tarek El Sayed Mahmod College of Law, University of Al Maarif, Iraq, Iraq
Khalid awad hammadi Al –Alwani College of Law, University of Al Maarif, Iraq, Iraq
Ismael Hellawss College of Law, University of Fallujah, Iraq, Iraq
Mahmood Shaker Alaloosh College of Administration and Economics, University of Kirkuk, Iraq, Iraq
Salah Ragab Fathelbab College of Law, University of Al Maarif, Iraq, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v11i1.16326

Keywords:

Digital Witness Protection, Technology, Islamic Law

Abstract

This study examines regulatory gaps in digital witness protection in cybercrime by analyzing the relationship between international standards, Egyptian law, and Islamic jurisprudence. The increasing use of digital testimony in cybercrime cases has not been matched by adequate legal protection, exposing witnesses to risks such as cyber intimidation, data leakage, and cross border retaliation. This study aims to identify these gaps and develop an integrated legal approach that strengthens witness protection while maintaining the integrity of criminal justice. The research applies a normative juridical approach supported by descriptive, analytical, and comparative methods. It analyzes the United Nations Convention on Cybercrime, Egyptian legislation on information technology crimes, and Islamic legal principles related to testimony and protection. The findings show that international standards provide relatively comprehensive protection through mechanisms such as anonymity, remote testimony, and relocation. In contrast, Egyptian law lacks specific provisions addressing digital risks, particularly in relation to technical safeguards, remote protection mechanisms, and international cooperation. From the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, witness protection is closely linked to the objectives of Sharia, especially the protection of life, dignity, and property, as well as the obligation to ensure truthful testimony without coercion. These principles provide a strong normative basis for adopting modern protection mechanisms, including digital anonymization and remote testimony. The study concludes that addressing regulatory gaps requires the integration of international standards with national legislation supported by Sharia based principles. It proposes a comprehensive model of digital witness protection that combines legal, technological, and ethical safeguards to enhance witness security, strengthen legal certainty, and improve the effectiveness of cybercrime enforcement in transnational contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Qayyum, Talib Hussain, and Ashfaq Ahmad. “An Applied Study of the Objectives of Islamic Law (Maqasid al-Shariah) and Jurisprudential Maxims (Qawaid al-Fiqhiyyah) on the Protection of Human Dignity in the Digital Age.” ASSA Journal 4, no. 2 (2025): 3384–3395. https://assajournal.com/index.php/36/article/view/1267.

Karim, Fatimah. “Application of the Islamic Legal Maxim ‘Hardship Begets Ease’ to Mitigate Hardship in the Religious Practices of the Elderly Muslims.” International Journal of Fiqh and Usul al Fiqh Studies 9, no. 3 (2025): 146–158. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijfus.v9i3.413.

Wahid, S., Musyahid, A., and R. HL. “The Logic of Impairment in Islamic Law: Philosophical Perspective as a Foundation for Ethics Education.” Journal of Education Review Provision 4, no. 3 (2024): 25–28. https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v4i3.462.

Rahma, Ahmed Al Domah, Mohammed Hassan Jama’a, Abker Ali Abdul Majid, and Ahmed Hammad Abdullah Abdul Rahim. “The Principle of Human Dignity in Islamic Jurisprudence and Its Impact on the Protection of Non-Combatants.” Journal of Economic, Administrative and Legal Sciences 2, no. 6 (2018): 17–33. https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.A140218.

Ben Farhat, Noureddine, and Abdelkader Amri. “The Transient Nature of Electronic Evidence and Its Impact on Criminal Investigations.” Legal and Political Research Journal 9, no. 1 (Year): 660–73. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/251462.

Hassan, Mona Ghazi Ibrahim. “The Effectiveness of Criminal Policy in Combating Cybercrime (A Comparative Study in Light of Cybersecurity Requirements).” Sharia and Law Magazine, Cairo, no. 45 (2025): 2619–2709.

Judge, R. M. “Criminal Protection for Persons Cooperating with Criminal Justice Authorities (Witnesses, Victims, and Expert Informants) in the Context of Organized Crime in International Conventions and Egyptian Law.” Al-Haq Magazine 40, no. 3 (2016): 1–104. https://doi.org/10.34120/jol.v40i3.2217.

Zaghloul, Tarek Ahmed Maher. “Procedural Protection for Victims, Witnesses, and Informants: A Comparative Analytical Study.” Journal of Legal and Economic Sciences, Faculty of Law, Ain Shams University 5, no. 1 (2017): 149–444.

Qatar. Law No. 5 of 2022 on the Protection of Victims, Witnesses, and Others in Similar Circumstances. Promulgated 2022. Accessed February 6, 2026. https://www.deepl.com/ar/translator.

Saudi Arabia. Royal Decree (M/148) Approving the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers, Witnesses, Experts, and Victims, issued 8 Shaban 1445 AH (corresponding to 18 February 2024). Published in Umm Al-Qura Official Gazette5022 on 1 March 2024. Accessed February 5, 2026. https://laws.boe.gov.sa/BoeLaws/Laws/LawDetails/6c421c5c-c137-442e-a854-b12200c46ffe/1.

Bharati, Dr. Rahul Kailas. “The New Criminal Law Paradigm in India and Its Impact on Cybercrime Adjudication.” July 24, 2025. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-93-7185-183-1. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5378219.

Lukings, M. K. A., A. Habibi Lashkari, and P. Hakimian. “Cybercrime Prevention Techniques & Comprehensive Cyber Crime Victim Service Package Proposal.” In Understanding Cybercrime Victim Services, Progress in IS, 155–76. Cham: Springer, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-13273-4_7.

Turvey, Brent E. “Forensic Victimology on Trial.” In Forensic Victimology: Examining Violent Crime Victims in Investigative and Legal Contexts. 3rd ed. Edited by Brent E. Turvey. Academic Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821768-9.00014-8.

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Right to the Truth. Human Rights Council, Fifteenth session, A/HRC/15/33. Geneva: United Nations, July 28, 2010. Accessed February 6, 2026. https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/15/33.

Lukings, M. K. A., A. Habibi Lashkari, and P. Hakimian. “Cybercrime Victim Services at an International Level.” In Understanding Cybercrime Victim Services, Progress in IS, edited by [Editor’s Name if available], 89–108. Cham: Springer, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-13273-4_6.

Tampubolon, M., and M. J. P. Tampubolon. “Cybercrime, Human Rights, and Digital Privacy: Navigating the Complex Landscape of Protection and Freedom.” In Integrating Artificial Intelligence, Security for Environmental and Business Sustainability, edited by A. Hamdan, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 608, 89–110. Cham: Springer, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96641-5_7.

Al Wuzayni, Khalid bin Zaid. “Rights of the Witness in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Journal of the Saudi Fiqh Society 10 (2011): 133–239. IslamicInfo / Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University. Record No. 147440.

Tahraoui, Zubair. Protection of Witnesses in Islamic Jurisprudence and Positive Law. PhD diss., Department of Islamic Sciences (Comparative Interpretation and Legislation), University of Eloued, Algeria, 2021. https://archives.univ-eloued.dz/handle/123456789/10554.

Wafi, Dr. Aya. “Criminal Protection Guarantees for Witnesses in Egyptian Legislation and Comparative Legislation.” Nile Journal of Business, Law, and Information Systems 5, no. 7 (2025): 26–64. https://mnsli.journals.ekb.eg/article_425860.html.

Al Derby, Abdul Aal, and Muhammad Al Sadiq Ismail. Cybercrime: A Comparative Legal Study of Arab Legislation in the Field of Combating Cybercrime and Internet Crime. Cairo: National Center for Legal Publications, 2018, 148–56.

Egypt. Law No. 175 of 2018 on Combating Information Technology Crimes. Official Gazette, August 2018. Accessed [insert access date]. https://www.deepl.com/ar/translator.

Salem, Iman Ali. “Witness Protection Measures in Contemporary International Criminal Systems: ‘The Rome Statute as a Model.’” Al-Mukhtar Journal of Humanities, no. 38 (2020): 176–79. https://doi.org/10.54172/mjssc.v38i1.640.

Alnawayseh, and Alnaqbi. “Using Video Conference Technology in Witness Protection: An Analytical Study in the Context of the UAE Legislation.” University of Sharjah (UoS) Journal of Law Sciences 19, no. 3 (2022): 409–38. https://doi.org/10.36394/jls.v19.i3.16.

Salem, I. A. “Witness Protection Measures in Contemporary International Criminal Systems: The Rome Statute as a Model.” Al Mukhtar Journal of Social Sciences 38, no. 1 (2024): 168–187. https://doi.org/10.54172/vejhsn31.

Aziz, D. K. A. A. “International and Regional Legal Frameworks for Witness Protection: Promoting Peace and Justice Through Strong Legal Institutions.” Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review 5, no. 1 (2025): e04676. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe04676.

Ramadan Asim Taher, The Role of Criminal Witness Protection in Achieving Justice in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Study, master's Thesis, Graduate School, Arab American University, 2022–2023, 22–23.

United Nations. United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (Palermo Convention), adopted November 15, 2000, entered into force September 29, 2003, Article 33(1). Accessed February 6, 2026. https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?src=treaty&mtdsg_no=xviii-12&chapter=18&clang=_en.

National Prosecutions Service of Tanzania. Witness Care and Protection Guidelines. Issued May 1, 2023, under the National Prosecutions Service Act, Cap. 430. Accessed February 5, 2026. https://tanzlii.org/en/akn/tz/doc/guidelines/2023 05 01/witness care and protection guidelines/eng@2023 05 01.

Bharati, Dr. Rahul Kailas. “The New Criminal Law Paradigm in India and Its Impact on Cybercrime Adjudication.” July 24, 2025. https://doi.org/10.70593/978 93 7185 183 1. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5378219.

Al Battawi, Tamara Ibrahim Mohsen. “The Role of Collective Ijtihad in Cybersecurity Issues.” Journal of the College of Islamic Sciences, no. 84 (2025). Accessed [insert date of access]. https://jcois.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/2075_8626/article/view/2618.

Kadhim, Tholfikar. “Applicable Law Governing Electronic Violation of Privacy Rights.” Al Sharaa: Journal for Legal and Administrative Studies 5, no. 1 (2025): 140–184.

Belbashir, Yaqoub. “Cybercrime in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Look at the Challenges and Emerging Risks.” Journal of Human Rights and Public Freedoms 10, no. 2 (Algeria, 2025): 249–27.

Alwan, Ali Abdul Hussein. “Cyberbullying and its Impact on Freedom of Expression on Social Media: A Field Study of Professors at the University of Diyala.” Journal of Media Studies and Research 3, no. 10 (2025): 300–312. https://msar.edu.iq/index.php/msar/article/view/115/53.

Al Sayed, Esaam Eldeen Abdel Al. “Legislative Confrontation of Extortion and Cyber Threat Offences in UAE Law: Comparative Study of Egyptian Law.” Al Fikr Al Sharati 33, no. 129 (2024): 63–118.

“Cyberbullying: The New Face of Digital Revenge: Young People’s Personal Data at Risk!” Indigo Dergisi, February 2026. Accessed February [day] 2026. https://indigodergisi.com/ar/2026/02/.

Bin Rais, ‘Abd al Rahman. “Protection of the Witness in Criminal Law between Statutory Law and Islamic Jurisprudence.” Maroc Law, 2024. Accessed February 5, 2026. https://maroclaw.com/.

Al-Shibili, Abdullah Ali, Ahmad Zaki Saleh, and Mohamad Zaharuddin Zakaria. “Witness Testimony and its Impediments between Islamic Law and Contemporary Laws.” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 7, no. 1

Valiño Ces, A. “The Importance of the Computer Undercover Agent as an Investigative Measure Against Cybercrime: A Special Reference to Child Pornography Crimes.” In Legal Developments on Cybersecurity and Related Fields, edited by F. A. Carneiro Pacheco de Andrade, P. M. Fernandes Freitas, and J. R. de Sousa Covelo de Abreu, 143–62. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 60. Cham: Springer, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41820-4_9.

Sikra, Juraj, Karen V. Renaud, and Daniel R. Thomas. “Investigating What Promotes and Deters Scottish Cybercrime Reporting.” Journal of Economic Criminology 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100103.

Popham, James, Mary McCluskey, Michael Ouellet, and Owen Gallupe. “Exploring Police Reported Cybercrime in Canada.” Policing: An International Journal 43, no. 1 (2020): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM 08 2019 0128.

McNealey, Rachel L., Camille I. Figueroa, and Cooper A. Maher. “‘Police Can’t Help You’: Exploring Influences on Perceptions of Policing Cybercrime.” Journal of Criminal Justice 101 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102542.

Busetti, Simone, and Francesco Maria Scanni. “Evaluating Incident Reporting in Cybersecurity: From Threat Detection to Policy Learning.” Government Information Quarterly 42, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.102000.

Hassan, Ayman Abdullah Fikri. “Electronic Witness in Criminal Evidence.” Journal of Sharia and Law in Cairo 44, no. 44 (2024): 3543–3607. https://doi.org/10.21608/mawq.2025.335120.1107.

Al Hamdani, Sumaya Jiad. “Criminal Evidence in the Digital Age: Towards an Intelligent System for Verifying the Credibility of Electronic Evidence.” Supreme Judicial Council (Iraq). Accessed February 6, 2026. https://www.sjc.iq/view/77460/.

Ho, Calvin Wai Loon, and Karel Caals. “A Call for an Ethics and Governance Action Plan to Harness the Power of Artificial Intelligence and Digitalization in Nephrology.” Seminars in Nephrology 41, no. 3 (2021): 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.05.009.

Kramer, Karen. “Protection of Witnesses and Whistle Blowers: How to Encourage People to Come Forward to Provide Testimony and Important Information.” In 149th International Training Course Visiting Experts’ Papers, 18–23. Tokyo: United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (UNAFEI), 2025. https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No86/No86_07VE_Kramer.pdf.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Good Practices for the Protection of Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings Involving Organized Crime. Vienna & New York: United Nations, 2008. https://www.unodc.org/documents/middleeastandnorthafrica/organised crime/Good_Practices_for_the_Protection_of_Witnesses_in_Criminal_Proceedings_Involving_Organized_Crime.pdf.

Chaudhary, Sunbal Islam, and Naseem Razi. “Witness Protection in Global Perspective: An Analysis of International Laws.” Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review 2, no. 4 (2024): 171–84.

Fakiha, Bandr. “Digital Forensics: Crimes and Challenges in Online Social Networks Forensics.” Journal of the Arab American University 6, no. 1 (2020): 19–28.

Al Deeb, Abu Bakr, and Dina Ibrahim. “Reflections of Artificial Intelligence on the Rules of Evidence.” Journal of Legal and Economic Research, Faculty of Law, Mansoura 14, Special Issue (April 2024): 1065–66. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjle.2024.386604.

Al Ghayathin, Abdulla Hamad O. J., Siti Aisyah Samudin, Mohd Norhusairi Mat Hussin, Mahamatayuding Samah, and Erik Sabti Rahmawati. “Protection of Witnesses in Criminal Lawsuits: An Analytical Study.” PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah 10, no. 1 (2025): 419–434. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v10i1.710.

Prashant Rahamgdale, "Witness Protection: Comparative Analysis of Indian and Australian Legislation," Journal of the Gujarat Research Society, 2020, 141–151.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Witness Protection, in UNODC Teaching Module Series: Organized Crime, accessed February 3, 2026, https://www.unodc.org/cld/en/education/tertiary/organized-crime/module-9/key-issues/witness-protection.html.

Imran, Mohammad Fadil. “Cyber Criminology and Human Security: An Analysis of ASEAN Countries Police’s Paradigm.” Journal of Human Security 18, no. 1 (2022): 49–53. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2022.18010034.

Achuthan, K., S. Khobragade, and R. Kowalski. “Cybercrime through the Public Lens: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12 (2025): 282. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04459-x.

Zamroni, Zamroni, and Basri. “Legal Protection for Victims of Cybercrime as a Form of Transnational Crime.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 9, no. 1 (2024): 130–49. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v9i1.8288.

A. Okeal, Tarek Elsayed Mahmoud. “The Role of Interdisciplinary Studies in Establishing the Rules of Technical Criminal Law – An Analytical Study.” Researcher Journal for Legal Sciences 5, no. 2 (2024): 95–113. https://uofjls.net/index.php/new/article/view/226.

Berendt, Bettina, and Stefan Schiffner. “Whistleblower Protection in the Digital Age – Why ‘Anonymous’ Is Not Enough: From Technology to a Wider View of Governance.” The International Review of Information Ethics 31, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.29173/irie479.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Good Practices for the Protection of Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings Involving Organized Crime. Vienna & New York: United Nations, 2008. https://www.unodc.org/documents/organized-crime/Witness-protection-manual-Feb08.pdf.

Al-Shorbagi, Ahmed Abdel Fattah. Criminal Protection for Witnesses and Whistleblowers in National and International Law. PhD diss., Faculty of Law, Ain Shams University, 20

Bamashmoos, A. M. “Witness Protection Programs: A Comparative Analysis of Saudi Arabian and U.S. Legal Mechanisms.” Journal of Humanities and Administrative Sciences, Shaqra University 12, no. 2 (2025): 372–380.

Abdulqader, Abdulrahman Abdulqader. “Himayat al-Shahada fi al-Shari’ah al-Islamiyah wa al-Nuzum al-Wad’iyah al-Mu’asirah.” Academic Journal of Research and Scientific Publishing 7, no. 73 (2025). https://doi.org/10.52132/Ajrsp/v7.73.1.

Aghnayah, Miftah Aghnayah Mohammed. “Protecting the Right to Life: A Legal Study in Maqasid Thought.” Al-Haq Journal for Sharia and Legal Sciences 2, no. 1 (2015): 186–220. https://doi.org/10.58916/alhaq.v2i1.213.

Council of Europe. The Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention, ETS No. 185) and its Protocols. Accessed February 6, 2026. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/the-budapest-convention.

World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report 2026. January 14, 2026. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2026/.

Rani, Sita, Aman Kataria, Vishal Sharma, Smarajit Ghosh, Vinod Karar, Kyungroul Lee, and Chang Choi. “Threats and Corrective Measures for IoT Security with Observance of Cybercrime: A Survey.” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (2021): Article 5579148, 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5579148.

SEON, Global Cybercrime Report: Which Countries Are Most at Risk in 2023, accessed February 2, 2026, https://seon.io/resources/global-cybercrime-report/.

United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, art. 24(1),

Mahmoud, Tarek Elsayed. The Pre-Trial Stage in the International Criminal Case. PhD diss., Faculty of Law, Benha University, 2018.