From Classical Kafā’ah to Contemporary Economic Justice: A Hadith-Based Legal Reassessment in Islamic Family Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.12880Keywords:
Kafa’ah, Hadith, Islamic Family Law, Maqashid ShariahAbstract
This study aims to reassess the concept of economic kafa’ah by re-examining prophetic traditions (ahadith) through a phenomenological and socio-legal lens. Employing qualitative methodology, this research integrates thematic hadith analysis, historical contextualization of classical juristic opinions, and phenomenological interpretation to explore shifts in meaning and application. The findings reveal that economic kafa’ah in prophetic tradition primarily emphasizes ethical reliability, economic responsibility, and shared life capital rather than pre-existing wealth or social pedigree. Contemporary application suggests that kafa’ah is a dynamic construct that may emerge through mutual potential, education, work ethic, and long-term economic cooperation. The legal reassessment demonstrates that classical hierarchy-based criteria are not immutable; instead, they may be contextualized according to maqasid al-shari‘ah to promote economic justice, household stability, and gender balanced financial roles. This study concludes that economic kafa’ah should be reconstructed as a principle of equitable capability and shared socio-economic commitment rather than rigid material equivalence.
Downloads
References
Abd. Nasir, Fatin Nasihah Jamal, and Mustafa Mat Jubri@ Shamsuddin. “The Husband’S Obligation in Providing Nafaqah To the Wife During the Pandemic Hardship: An Analysis From an Islamic Perspective.” Jurnal Syariah 32, no. 2 (2024): 300–349. https://doi.org/10.22452/syariah.vol31no2.4.
Agama, Institut, Islam Negeri Curup, and Deo Agung Pratama. “Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Judicial Interpretation of Surabaya District Court Decision No. 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby in the Perspective of Human Rights and Islamic Law Compilation.” Berasan: Journal of Islamic Civil Law 4, no. 1 (June 11, 2025): 14–34. https://doi.org/10.29240/BERASAN.V4I1.8390.
Andrea, Fahmi Tiara Rahma, and Zakiah Nurul Awaliyah. “Fulfillment of The Rights of Wife and Children Post Divorce.” MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review 1, no. 2 (2022): 231. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v1i2.6211.
Andri, Andri. “Urgensi Kafaah Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Pada Pasal 15 Ayat 1.” Jurnal An-Nahl 8, no. 1 (2021): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.54576/annahl.v8i1.23.
Atikah, Nur, Binti Jailan, Zuliza Binti, and Mohd Kusrin. “Compatibility (KAFA’AH) in Islamic Marriage: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Sosial Sciences 13, no. 11 (2023): 2222–6990. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i11/19167.
Dahlan, A. “Kafaah Dalam Pernikahan Menurut Ulama Fiqh.” Asa 2 (2021): 28–41.
Gustiawati, Syarifah, and Novia Lestari. “Aktualisasi Konsep Kafa’ah Dalam Membangun Keharmonisan Rumah Tangga.” Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 4, no. 1 (2018): 33–86. https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v4i1.174.
Hukum, Dalam Hadis-hadis. “Konsep Kafa ’ Ah Dalam Hadis-Hadis Hukum” 03, no. 02 (2021): 24–34.
Jaiyeoba, Haruna Babatunde, and Noor Mohammad Osmani. “Hadith Preservation: Techniques and Contemporary Efforts.” Journal of Fatwa Management and Research 29, no. 3 (2024): 31–45. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol29no3.597.
Kusrin, Zuliza Mohd, Wafaa’ Yusof, Nor Faizah Ismail, Norsyamlina Che Abdul Rahim, and Abderrahmane Hibaoui. “Muslim in Malaysia Understanding in Regards to the Concept of Compatibility (Kafa’ah) in Islamic Marriage.” El-Usrah 7, no. 2 (2024): 648–76. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i2.26664.
Lassi, Zohra S., Anna Ali, and Salima Meherali. “Women’s Participation in Household Decision Making and Justification of Wife Beating: A Secondary Data Analysis from Pakistan’s Demographic and Health Survey.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 19 (2021): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910011.
Liddini, Laily. “Khuluqiyya, Vol 3 No 2 Juli 2021” 3, no. 2 (2021): 18–50.
Mohadi, Mawloud. “Normative Islamic Conceptualizations of Families and Kinship through Maqasid Perspectives: A Comprehensive Literature Study.” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 11 (2023). https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mlsnjl11&id=298&div=&collection=.
Muhammad Habibul Amin, and Dhiauddin Tanjung. “Maqashid Syariah: Perbandingan Antara Pemikiran Al - Ghazali Dan Najmuddin At - Thufi.” El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 4, no. 5 (2024): 2417–29. https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v4i5.3497.
Muhammad Khakim Ashari, and Zumrotus Sholikhah. “Reconstructing the Concept of Kafa’ah in Marriage: The Perspective of Islamic Law and Social Reality.” Al-Khass: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law 1, no. 1 (2025): 14–23. https://journal.staimun.ac.id/index.php/alkhass.
Muhtarom, Ali. “Problematika Konsep Kafaâ€TMah Dalam Fiqih (Kritik Dan Reinterpretasi).” Jurnal Hukum Islam 16 (2018): 205–21. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v16i2.1739.
Muzakki, Ahmad, and Himami Hafshawati. “Kedudukan Dan Standarisasi Kafaah Dalam Pernikahan Perspektif Ulama Madzhab Empat.” Asy-Syari’ah : Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (January 12, 2021): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.55210/ASSYARIAH.V7I1.429.
Nasution, Hamzah. “KAFA’AH IN ISLAMIC MARRIAGE: CONCEPTUAL RECONSTRUCTION AND CRITICAL REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY JURISPRUDENCE.” Qawwam: The Leader’s Writing 6, no. 1 (2025): 1–12.
Royani, Ahmad. “Kafa’ah Dalam Perkawinan Islam (Tela’ah Kesederajatan Agama Dan Sosial).” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Keluarga Dan Kajian Kesilaman 5, no. 1 (2013): 103–20.
Scott, Sue. “The Personable and the Powerful: Gender and Status in Sociological Research.” Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice, January 1, 2023, 165–78. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003457367-10/PERSONABLE-POWERFUL-GENDER-STATUS-SOCIOLOGICAL-RESEARCH-SUE-SCOTT.
Shahin, Shahwiqar. “The Islamic Legal and Cultural Influences on Britain’s Shari’a Councils.” Heythrop, December 18, 2023.
Taufik, Otong Husni. “Kafâah Dalam Pernikahan Menurut Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 5, no. 2 (2017): 246. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v5i2.795.
Ullah, Muhammad Zia. “Interfaith Harmony : A Look at Muslim-Non-Muslim Coexistence Interfaith Harmony : A Look at Muslim- Non-Muslim Coexistence Abstract : Introduction : The Islamic Religion Is a Religion of Ease , Tolerance , and the Lifting Of.” Tanazur 2, no. 2 (2023): 107–18.
Vol, Jurnal Keislaman. “Https://Ejournal.Unzah.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Humanistika” 7, no. 1 (2021): 67–91.
Wells, Michael B., Birgitta Kerstis, and Ewa Andersson. “Impacted Family Equality, Self-Confidence and Loneliness: A Cross-Sectional Study of First-Time and Multi-Time Fathers’ Satisfaction with Prenatal and Postnatal Father Groups in Sweden.” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 35, no. 3 (2021): 844–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12900.
Wirastri, Theresia Dyah, and Stijn Cornelis van Huis. “The Second Wife: Ambivalences towards State Regulation of Polygamy in Indonesia.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53, no. 2 (2021): 246–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1912579;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER.
Worthington, Lisa. “The Lived Experiences of Progressive Muslims: Exploring the Limits of Individualisation.” Accessed November 23, 2025. http://media.wix.com/ugd/cd26e8_8c87e8cd43e7436390361786dd46053d.pdf.
Wujarso, Riyanto. “Ciptaan Disebarluaskan Di BawahLisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional PERAN HUMAN CAPITAL DALAM PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI.” 430 Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research. ( Printed) 6, no. 2 (2022): 430–38. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisamar.v6i2.790.
Ziadeh, Farhat J. “Equality (Kafa’ah) in the Muslim Law of Marriage.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 6, no. 4 (1957): 503. https://doi.org/10.2307/838163.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zurifah Nurdin, Suryani, Agusten

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














.jpg)
