Islamic Judicial Activism in Determining Child Maintenance: Ex Officio Authority and Peaceful Settlement in Indonesian Religious Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.12755Keywords:
child support, ex officio authority, Islamic judicial activism, family lawAbstract
This article examines the construction of Islamic law in determining child support after divorce through two mechanisms in Indonesia’s Religious Courts: amicable settlement (ṣulḥ) and judges’ ex officio authority. Although both have a clear legal basis, their practice continues to face challenges: amicable settlements are often compromise-based without objective evaluation of children’s needs, while ex officio rulings tend to be more responsive but lack uniformity due to the absence of standardized guidelines. Employing a juridical-empirical approach with content analysis of four representative decisions from the Bintuhan and Manna Religious Courts (2023–2024), this study identifies the legal considerations applied, assesses the adequacy of child support amounts, and compares the effectiveness of both mechanisms. The findings reveal that amicable settlements frequently result in insufficient child support, whereas ex officio rulings better protect children’s interests yet remain inconsistent. By integrating the principle of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, particularly ḥifẓ al-nasl (protection of lineage), this research introduces the concept of Islamic judicial activism, which positions judges as proactive actors in ensuring the child’s best interests. Theoretically, the study enriches global Islamic legal discourse by proposing a maqāṣid-oriented adjudication model that bridges normative texts, socio-economic realities, and substantive justice. Practically, it recommends that the Supreme Court establish national guidelines for child support determination based on cost-of-living standards, enhance judges’ capacity, and strengthen monitoring mechanisms for enforcement. Thus, this study not only contributes to comparative family law scholarship but also offers an innovative normative model for child protection in Muslim jurisdictions.
Downloads
References
Agustin, Dian, and Ahmad Musadad. “Disparitas Keberhasilan Mediasi Antara Perkara Perceraian Dan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Surabaya.” Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 2 (2023): 192. https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v9i2.357.
Ahmed, Hala, and Nour El-Din. “Indeterminacy of the Best Interest of the Child and Shari’a Rules in Custody Adjudications: Egypt Case.” Theses and Dissertations, June 15, 2021. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1641.
Firdaus. “The Principles of the Concept of Maslahah in Islamic Family Law of a Wife Looking for Living Husband Taking Care of Household Work.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2024): 259–84.
Fuadi, Ahmad Syarif, Dadin Eka Saputra, and Munajah Munajah. “Analisis Yuridis Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Martapura Nomor 318/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mtp).” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2021): 70–87. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v1i1.21.
Islamie, Fikri. “Otoritas Tafsir Tabiin: Analisis Penafsiran Qat a Dah Bin Di'a Mah Al-Sad usiy Tentang Ayat-Ayat Takdir” 2, no. 1 (2025): 21–40.
Jamil, Abdul, and Muliadi Nur. “Perlindungan Hukum Dan Keadilan Para Pihak Melalui Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Putusan Verstek Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 29, no. 2 (2022): 439–60. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art10.
Kalverboer, Margrite, Daan Beltman, Carla Van Os, and Elianne Zijlstra. “The Best Interests of the Child in Cases of Migration: Assessing and Determining the Best Interests of the Child in Migration Procedures.” International Journal of Children’s Rights 25, no. 1 (2017): 114–39. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02501005.
Kemenag RI, Dirjen Bimas Islam. Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Bina KUA, 2018.
Kurniawan, Mitra, Zulfahmi Bustami, and Sofia Hardani. “Analisis Kritis Pasal 156 (C) KHI Mengenai Pemindahan Hak Asuh Anak Dalam Konteks Penelantaran Oleh Ibu: Perspektif Maqashid Al-Syari'ah.” Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 5, no. 2 (2023): 315–30. https://doi.org/10.33367/legitima.v5i2.3828.
“M. Nur Syafiuddin, Aksentuasi Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Dalam Putusan Nafkah Sebagai Upaya Penjaminan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jurnal HAM, Vol 13, No 2, Agustus 2022, Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.30641/Ham.2022.13.235-252.No Title,” n.d.
Meyer, Charles J., Justin W. Soulen, and Ellen Goldberg Weiner. “Child Support Determinations in High Income Families - A Survey of the Fifty States.” Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 28 (2015). https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jaaml28&id=509&div=&collection=.
Meyer, Daniel R., Maria Cancian, and Yiyu Chen. “Why Are Child Support Orders Becoming Less Likely after Divorce?” Https://Doi.Org/10.1086/681604 89, no. 2 (June 1, 2015): 301–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/681604.
Musyahid, Ahmad. “Struktur Kaidah Fiqhiyyah : Fondasi Universal Dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam” 3, no. 2 (2025): 692–700.
Nafiz, Al, Ezha Indra Rizhal Noor, Herlina, and Maulina. “Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih Yang Berkaitan Dengan Perubahan Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya , Indonesia Agama Yang _ Salihun Li Kulli Zaman Wa Makan _. Sejak Dahulu , Keberadaan Islam Memang Di.” Al -Mustaqbal: Jurnal Agama Islam 2, no. 2 (2025): 141–50.
Novita, Dwi, Mohamad Sar’an, Asep Ahmad Ridwansah, Suharyono, and Hamdan Ardiansyah. “Family Conflict Disclosure on Social Media in Islamic Law: Islah as a Reconciliation Mechanism.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 10, no. 1 (2025): 443–58. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.12658.
Nugraheni, Destri Budi. “Urgensi Penggunaan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pembatalan Perkawinan Di Pengadilan Agama.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 14, no. 2 (2020): 251–66. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v14i2.4177.
Ramli, Muhammad Amirul. “Bulletin of Early Childhood.” Bulletin of Early Childhood 1, no. 1 (2022): 1–19.
Rasul, Imran. “Household Bargaining over Fertility: Theory and Evidence from Malaysia.” Journal of Development Economics 86, no. 2 (June 1, 2008): 215–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDEVECO.2007.02.005.
“Rivanka Gradian Baldi, Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemenuhan Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Melalui Mediasi Di Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu Pemberdayaan Perempuan Dan Anak, Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Vol 10, No 2, 2023, Https://Jom.Un,” n.d.
Safira, Levana, Sonny Dewi Judiasih, and Deviana Yuanitasari. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Perkawinan Bawah Umur Tanpa Dispensasi Kawin Dari Pengadilan.” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An 4, no. 2 (2021): 210–25. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v4i2.521.
Saifullah, Muhammad. “Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Jawa Tengah.” Al-Ahkam 25, no. 2 (2015): 181. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2015.25.2.601.
Seefeldt, Kristin S. “Constant Consumption Smoothing, Limited Investments, and Few Repayments: The Role of Debt in the Financial Lives of Economically Vulnerable Families.” Social Service Review 89, no. 2 (June 30, 2015): 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/681932.
Shabbir, Syeda Saima, and Syeda Saima Shabbir. “Analysing Welfare Of Child Through Law: Impact Of Key Rulings Of The Supreme Court Of Pakistan In Shaping The Legal Landscape Of Child Maintenance.” Journal of Media Horizons 6, no. 4 (September 6, 2025): 66–81. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17066535.
Suhaili, Achmad. “Integrasi Maqasid Al-Syari’ah Dalam Praktik Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia: Studi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Keluarga.” Mabahits : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 6, no. 1 (2025): 1–14.
Syamsuar, Ahmad Omar Chapakia, Amrizal Hamsa, and Amelia. “Integration of Maqashid Syaria in Nurcholish Madjid’s Thingking about Principles for Effective Good Governance.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2024): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i1.9701.
“Udin Latif, Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Melindungi Hak-Hak Perempuan Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Pada Perkara Cerai Talak Di Pengadilan Agama Sorong, Jurnal Hukum Muadalah: IAIN Sorong, Vol. 1 No.2, 2022, Https://Doi.Org/10.4794,” n.d.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alamsyah alamsyah, Asrianti Sukirman, Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas, Aden Rosadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).