Intransitive Independent Clauses in Film “Ḏīb”: Modern Linguistic Study Based on Kenneth L. Pike’s Tagmemic Perspective

Authors

  • Abdul Basid Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-421X
  • Muhamad Syahril Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
  • Mohamad Irvan Muzakky Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Ichwanul Muttaqin Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
  • M. Firdaus Imaduddin King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
  • Masrokhin Masrokhin Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v6i2.4240

Keywords:

Clause structure, intransitive clause, modern linguistics, tagmemic, tagmeme

Abstract

This study aimed to reveal the structures of intransitive independent clauses in the film “Ḏīb†based on the perspective of Kenneth L. Pike’s tagmemic theory. This was a qualitative descriptive study. This study gathered data from an Arabic film entitled Ḏīb directed by Naji Abu Nowar. The data collection techniques used in this study were watching, translating, and note-taking techniques. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicated that there were four structures of intransitive independent clauses in the film “Ḏīb,†namely: (1) S + P consisted of three parts: The first was S + P. The second was the intransitive independent clause = NP + IVP. The third covered slot containing S + P, class which entailed NP + IVP, role that subsumed S + P, and cohesion without objects. (2) P + S + Adjunct (Adj – NP) comprised three parts. The first was P + S + Adj – NP. The second was the intransitive independent clause = IVP + NP1 + NP2. The third consisted of slot which contained P + S + Adj, class that subsumed IVP + NP1 + NP2, role which entailed P + S + Adj, and cohesion without objects. (3) P + S + Adjunct (Adj – PP) had three parts. The first was P + S + Adj – PP. The second was the intransitive independent clause = IVP + NP + PP. The third involved slot which entailed P + S + Adj, class that subsumed IVP + NP + PP, role comprised of P + S + Adj, and cohesion without objects. (4) S + P + Adjunct (Adj – AP) consisted of three parts. The first was S + P + Adj – AP. The second was the intransitive independent clause = NP + IVP + AP. The third comprised slot containing S + P + Adj, class which subsumed NP + IVP + AP, role consisting of S + P + Adj, and cohesion without objects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, B. A. “A Tagmemic Analysis of The Wolaitta Language.†University of London, 1983. https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00028866.

Aini, Aldila Arin, Islamiah Bastiar, and Sumarlam. “Kemenangan Donald Trump Sebagai Presiden Amerika Serikat Ke-45 Melalui Analisis Konstruksi Klausa Ralatif Bahasa Inggris Dan Bahasa Indonesia Secara Semantis.†Prasasti: Journal of Linguistics 3, no. 1 (2018): 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v18i1.3636.

Altahmazi, Thulfiqar Hussein. “Collective Pragmatic Acting in Networked Spaces: The Case of #activism in Arabic and English Twitter Discourse.†Lingua 239 (2020): 102837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102837.

Andriyani, Fitriana. “Klausa Relatif Bahasa Indonesia Dengan Penanda Relatif Di Mana, Yang Mana Dan Dalam Mana.†Nuansa Indonesia: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Filologi 20, no. 1 (2018): 83–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/ni.v20i1.35802.

Attia, Alaa Fathi, and Abdul Fattah Abu-Ssaydeh. “Some Aspects of the Syntax of the Arabic Legislative Sentence.†IJAES: International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 18 (2018): 111–32. http://www.ijaes.net/article/viewarticle?volume=18&issue=1&articleId=6.

Baker, Paul, and Jesse Egbert. Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research. New York: Routledge, 2016.

Bloomfield, Leonard, and Edward Sapir. “Language: An n Introduction to the Study of Speech.†The Classical Weekly 15, no. 18 (1922): 142–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4388302.

Cook, Walter A. “Introductins to Tagmemic Analysis.†Georgetown University, 1969. https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Tagmemic-Analysis-Walter-Cook/dp/0878401717.

Darwin. “Struktur Klausa Independen Bahasa Dondo.†Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra 2, no. 2 (2017): 25–38. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/BDS/article/view/12283.

Durand, Mary Alison, and Tracey Chatler. Principle of Social Research. New York: Open University Press, 2014.

Ekka, Rajesh. Research Methodology and Data Analysis in Humanities and Social Sciences. Solapur: Laxmi Book Publication, 2014.

Elson, Benjamin, and Velma Pickett. An Introduction to Morphology and Syntax. Maxico City: The Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1962.

Fren, Edward F. Advanced Focus Group Research. London: Sage Publication Inc., 2001.

Fries, Peter H., Kenneth L. Pike, and Evelyn G. Pike. “Gramatical Analysis.†Language 55, no. 4 (1979): 907–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/412752.

Gentens, Caroline. “Parenthetical Clauses and Speech Reporting: The Case of Shriek.†Language Sciences 90 (2022): 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101460.

Graf, Tim, Markus Philipp, Xiaonan Xu, Franziska Kretzschmar, and Beatrice Primus. “The Interaction between Telicity and Agentivity: Experimental Evidence from Intransitive Verbs in German and Chinese.†Lingua 200 (2017): 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.08.006.

Holilulloh, Andi, Sugeng Sugiyono, and Zamzam Afandi. “Taisir Al-Nahw Al-‘Arabi: Analisis Pemikiran Mahdi Al-Makhzumi Dalam Pembaruan Nahwu.†Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab 5, no. 1 (2021): 95–112. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v5i1.2102.

Huda, Moh. Syaiful. “Frasa Dan Klausa Pembangun Dalam Novel Dia Adalah Dilanku Tahun 1991 Karya Pidi Baiq.†LOA: Jurnal Ketatabahasaan Dan Kesusastraan 16, no. 1 (2021): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.26499/loa.v16i1.2658.

Iskandar. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Sosial (Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif). Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press, 2008.

Istiqomah, Himatul. “Analisis Morfologi Doa Dalam Al-Qur-an Surat Al-Baqarah 186.†Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab 3, no. 2 (2019): 251–60. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v3i2.970.

Jaradat, Abdulazeez. “On Secondary Grammaticalization: The Case of Hatta in Rural Jordanian Arabic.†IJAES: International Journal of Arabic-English Studies 22, no. 1 (2022): 7–28. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.22.1.1.

Jha, Avdhesh S. Social Research Methods. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education, 2014.

Lein, Adeline Lelo, and Desta Gloria Siahaan. “Struktur Dasar Klausa Verbal Bahasa Lamaholot Dialek Lewokluok (Sebuah Kajian Awal).†Jubindo: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 5, no. 2 (2020): 88–97. https://doi.org/10.32938/jbi.v5i2.573.

Luthfan, Muhammad Aqil, and Syamsul Hadi. “Morfologi Bahasa Arab: Reformulasi Sistem Derivasi Dan Infleksi.†Alsina: Journal of Arabic Studies 1, no. 1 (2019): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21580/alsina.1.1.2599.

Nowar, Naji Abu. Theeb. Yordania: Bayt Al Shawareb, 2014.

Olson, Michael Leon. “Barai Syntax: A Comparative Study of Tagmemic and Transformational Analyses.†Simon Fraser University, 1974. http://summit.sfu.ca/item/2959.

Rakhlin, Natalia, and Ljiljana Progovac. “Hierarchical Clause Structure As a Tool for Cognitive Advances in Early Childhood.†Language Sciences 83 (2021): 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101316.

Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. Metodologi Penelitian: Kajian Budaya Dan Ilmu Sosial Humaniora Pada Umumnya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Rini, Rini. “Ushul Al-Nahwi Al-Arabi: Kajian Tentang Landasan Ilmu Nahwu.†Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab 3, no. 1 (2019): 145–62. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v3i1.773.

Rustinar, Eli. “Kontruksi Klausa Makian Pada Partisipan Usia Tua Dalam Bahasa Melayu Bengkulu.†Jurnal KIBASP: Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajaran 3, no. 1 (2019): 60–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/kibasp.v3i1.969.

Sahu, Pradip Kumar. Research Methodology. New York: Springer, 2013.

Sayidah, Nur. Metodologi Penelitan. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara, 2018.

Septiana, Ponia Mega, Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna, and Rosaria Mita Amalia. “Material Processes in English Clause of Life Insurance: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Approach.†Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa 8, no. 2 (2019): 164–71. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v8i2.884.

Soares, Antonio Constantino. “Verba Bervalensi Satu, Dua, Dan Tiga Pada Bahasa Makasae.†PESONA: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2016): 74–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26638/jp.194.2080.

Soeparno. Aliran Tagmemik: Teori, Analisis, Dan Penerapan Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2008. https://perpustakaanbalaibahasadiy.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=16387&keywords=.

———. Dasar-Dasar Linguistik Umum. 1th ed. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2002. http://library.fip.uny.ac.id/opac/index.php?p=show_detail&id=2067.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Sintaksis. 4th ed. Bandung: Angkasa, 1986. https://library.unismuh.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=2695.

Weathington, Bart L., Christopher J. L. Cunningham, and David J. Pittenger. Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010.

Zuhriah, Najmuddin H. Abd Safa, Ikhwan M. Said, and Yusring Sanusi Baso. “Aplikasi Pengidentifikasi Verba Perfektif Bahasa Arab.†Nady Al-Adab: Jurnal Bahasa Arab 18, no. 1 (2021): 99–120. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/naa/article/view/18233.

Downloads

Published

04-11-2022

How to Cite

Basid, A., Syahril, M., Muzakky, M. I., Muttaqin, I., Imaduddin, M. F., & Masrokhin, M. (2022). Intransitive Independent Clauses in Film “Ḏīb”: Modern Linguistic Study Based on Kenneth L. Pike’s Tagmemic Perspective. Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 6(2 November), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v6i2.4240

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check