The Social Rhetoric of the Qur’an: A Thematic Stylistic Approach

Authors

  • Partomuan Harahap UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia
  • Asrina UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • Syofyan Hadi UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • Nurlaila UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v9i2.14170

Keywords:

The Qur’an, Stylistics, Social Criticism

Abstract

This study explores the way the Qur’an conveys social criticism through its distinctive rhetorical style. Employing a thematic stylistic approach, the research analyzed selected verses representing criticism of social inequality (Q.S. Al-Isra’: 26–27), human and environmental exploitation (Q.S. Al-Qasas: 4; Q.S. Ar-Rum: 41), and moral deviation (Q.S. Al-Hujurat: 11; Q.S. An-Nisa’: 58). The method applied was qualitative-descriptive, using critical textual reading focusing on the thematic and stylistic features of the verses. The analysis drew on al-Sakkaki’s theory of al-Ma‘ani to identify the rhetorical forms and their social meanings. The findings indicate that in Q.S. Al-Isra’: 26–27, the Qur’an employs Uslub al-Amr as a form of ethical motivation; Uslub Khatimah Maw‘iiyyah to frame prohibition with theological condemnation; Uslub Siyaq wa Sibaq to balance commands and prohibitions; and Uslub Taqdīm wa Ta’khīr to emphasize social priorities in the distribution of rights. In Q.S. Al-Qasas: 4, rhetorical devices include Uslub Ta’kīd, Taqdīm wa Ta’khīr, Ināb, and the use of Fiʿl Muāriʿ in Maqām Zamm. In Q.S. Ar-Rum: 41, the text contains Ta’kīd, causality style (‘Illah/Ta‘līl), Maqām Tamīn, Fiʿl Muāriʿ in contextual emphasis, and further Ināb. In Q.S. Al-Hujurat: 11, the styles include Uslub Nidā’, Taqdīm wa Taʾkhīr, At-Tikrār, and Tahdīd. In Q.S. An-Nisa’: 58, rhetorical devices identified are Ta’kīd, Tarkīb Fiʿlī Muāriʿ, Kalimah Syariyyah, numerical reinforcement, and Khatimah Ilahiyyah. This study introduces the concept of “Qur’anic Social Rhetoric,” a stylistic perspective that highlights the interrelation between the Qur’an’s rhetorical structures and their socio-ethical functions. It demonstrates that the Qur’anic style not only embodies aesthetic and linguistic excellence but also serves as a medium of social critique, moral guidance, and transformation, ultimately reflecting the Qur’an’s essential role in shaping public ethics and social justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A’yun, Loita Kurrota. “Gaya Bahasa Kiasan Dalam Puisi ‘Mansyūrātun Fidāiyyatun ‘Alā Judrāni Isrāīl.’” Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab 2, no. 2 (December 26, 2018): 161. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v2i2.549.
Abdurrahman, Khaled Yahya, and Noza Aflisia. “Al-Balāghah ‘Inda Al-Zamakhsyarî : Marhalah Nadhji Al-Bahtsi Haula Al-‘I’Jãz Al-Qur’Ānī.” Al-Irfan : Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies 5, no. 1 (March 13, 2022): 34–46. https://doi.org/10.36835/alirfan.v5i1.5460.
Adam, Hashfi. “Perilaku Bullying Dan Penanganannya Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Agama Islam.” UNUI, 2019.
Adi, Isbandi Rukminto. “Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial Pembangunan Sosial Dan Pembangunan Yang Berpusat Pada Manusia” 1, no. 1 (2002).
Aflisia, Noza. “Teaching Balaghah for the Purpose of Appreciation of Al-Quran Language.” Lughawiyyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan … 4 (2021): 156–72. http://ejournal.iaidalwa.ac.id/ihttp://ejournal.iaidalwa.ac.id/index.php/Lughawiyyat/article/download/537/303.
Arp, Lori. “Library Literacy.” American Library Association 34, no. 2 (2010): 158–63.
Awadin, Adi Pratama, Ahmad Zuhdi, Fitroh Ni, Edi Sutardi, and Edi Komarudin. “Epistemologi Ilmu Balaghah Dalam Al-Qur ’ An” 6, no. 1 (2025): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.35316/lahjah.v6i1.87-102.
Busyairi Majidi. “Karakteristik Orang-Orang Munafik Dalam Al-Qur’an (Menurut Tafsir Ibnu Katsir QS, An-Nisa 142 & At-Taubah 67).” Universitas Islam Negri Mataram, 2022.
Fajri, Muhammad, and Ahmad Syukri. “Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Al- Qur ’ an : Studi Terhadap Tafsir Al Manar Karya Muhammad Rasyid Ridha Dan Tafsīr FῙ Zhilālil Qur ’ an Karya Sayyid Quthb Program Studi Magister Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam ,” 2 (2025).
Gerald Bast, Elias G. Carayannis, David F. J. Campbell. “The Future of Education and Labor.” Arts, Research, Innovation and Society (ARIS), 2019.
Hafis, Raden Imam Al, and Moris Adidi Yogia. “Abuse Of Power: Tinjauan Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan Oleh Pejabat Publik Di Indonesia.” PUBLIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Adminastrasi Publik 3, no. 1 (2017): 80–88.
Imam Muslim Amin, Dede Kurniawan, Eni Zulaiha. “Tafsir Maudhu’i: Menelisik Sejarah, Metode, Dan Signifikansinya Dalam Pemikiran Tafsir Kontemporer.” JSIM: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 5, no. 5 (2025): 1–23.
Irsyadunnas, Irsyadunnas. “Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Gender Ala Amina Wadud Perspektif Hermeneutika Gadamer.” Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam 14, no. 2 (2015): 123. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2015.142.123-142.
Ismail, Asep Usman. “Kesejahteraan Sosial Perspektif Al-Qur`an.” EMPATI: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial 4, no. 1 (2015): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.15408/empati.v4i1.9766.
John Schwieter, Aline Ferreira. Introduction to Translation and Interpreting Studies. Wiley. John Wiley & Sons, 2022.
Khasanah, Kholifatul. “Gaya Bahasa Dalam Al-Qur’an (Analisis Tasybih Pada Surat Al-A’raf).” Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, 2023.
Kilmann, R. H., & Covin, T. J. Corporate Transformation: Revitalizing Organizations for a Competitive World. APA PsycInfo, 1988.
Kurnia, Yuangga. “Gaya Bahasa Tauriyah Dalam Ayatal-Qur’an.” Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab 2, no. 1 (2018): 38–39.
Lintang, Daud. “Epistemologi Balagah; Studi Atas Miftah Al-Ulum Karya Al-Sakaki,” 2017.
M. Quraish Shihab. Metodologi Tafsir Al-Quran: Dari Tematik Hingga Maqashidi. Lentera Hati, 2025.
Makinuddin, Moh. “Mengenal Uslub Dalam Struktur Kalimat Dan Makna.” MIYAH: Jurnal Studi Islam 14 (2018): 160–81.
Mamasoni, Muhammad Subhi. “Uslub Al-Qur’an: Studi Uslub Taqdim Wa Ta’khir Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Al-Ma’any: Jurnal Studi Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab 1, no. 1 (2022): 63.
Misnawati, Misnawati, Samsul Bahri, and Muhammad Nuzul Abrar. “Pemikiran Mohammed Arkoun Dalam Penafsiran Kontemporer.” Jurnal MUDARRISUNA: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam 12, no. 2 (2022): 271. https://doi.org/10.22373/jm.v12i2.13292.
Moh. Rozin, and Ahmad Musonnif Alfi. “Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur`an.” AL ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an 3, no. 2 (2017): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.47454/itqan.v3i2.33.
Muyassarah, and Jaenafil Abadi. “Klasifikasi Puisi Arab Jahiliyah Menurut Ibn Qutaybah Dalam Kitab Al-Shi’r Wa-Al-Shu‘Arā.’” Al-Ma‘Rifah 18, no. 1 (2021): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/almakrifah.18.01.07.
Rachman, Tahar. “Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd Dan Teori Interpretasinya.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. 6, no. 11 (2018): 10–27.
Ramadani, Ranjy. “Gaya Bahasa Cerpen Lailatun Ghaba ‘Anha Al-Qamar Karya Najib Al-Kilany (Analisis Stilistika).” Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab 5, no. 1 (2021): 4–6.
Raof, Hussein Abdul. Arabic Rethoric: A Pracmatic Analysis. Rodledge, 2006. https://doi.org/10.24252/diwan.v4i1.4146.
Rifqi, Muhamad. “Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan Lembaga-Lembaga Penguasa Pada Pemilu Di Indonesia Tahun 2024 Perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali ( 505H / 1111M ).” UIN Jakarta. UIN Jakarta, 2024.
Rohmani, Faoziyah. “Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Munafik Dalam Kitab Al-Munafiqun Fî Al-Qur’an Al-Karim Karya Abdul Aziz Abdullah Al-Humaidi.” Al Karima : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (2021): 18. https://doi.org/10.58438/alkarima.v4i2.29.
Saputra, Syukri Hamdi. “دراسة سياقية عن الأيات الثلاثة الأولى من سورة الناس.” Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab 2, no. 2 (2018): 223.
Sari, Intan kurnia. Bullying Dalam Al-Qur’an (Studi Tafsir Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia). Skripsi, 2018.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Wawasan Al-Quran: Tafsir Tematik Atas Pelbagai Persoalan Umat. Mizan, 2007.
Valera, Luca, and Juan Carlos Castilla. “Global Changes: Ethics, Politics and Environment in the Contemporary Technological World.” Science And Technology, no. March (2020): 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29443-4.
Wahab Syakhrani, Abdul, and Saipul Rahli. “Latar Belakang Munculnya Ilmu Balaghah, Tokoh-Tokoh, Karya-Karyanya Dan Aspek-Aspeknya.” MUSHAF JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Hadis 3, no. 1 (2022): 59–71. https://doi.org/10.54443/mushaf.v3i1.88.
Wosnitza, M., Karabenick, S. A., Efklides, A., & Nenniger, P. “Contemporary Motivation Research: From Global to Local Perspectives.” Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, 2009.
Zamzami, Kusroni dan Mukhammad. “Revesiting Methodology of Quranic Interpretation: A Tematic Contextual Approach to The Qur’an.” Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 11, no. 1 (2021): 177–202.

Downloads

Published

01-11-2025

How to Cite

Harahap, P., Asrina, Hadi, S., & Nurlaila. (2025). The Social Rhetoric of the Qur’an: A Thematic Stylistic Approach. Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 9(2), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v9i2.14170

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check