Enhancing Arabic Speaking Skills: A Study on Instructional Design, Implementation, and Assessment

Albarra Sarbaini; Novita Rahmi

doi:10.29240/jba.v8i2.10828

Authors

Albarra Sarbaini Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Lampung, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0341-6479
Novita Rahmi Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v8i2.10828

Keywords:

Arabic speaking skills, language proficiency, instructional design, teaching strategies, lecturer preparation

Abstract

Effective teaching and learning of speaking skills are vital for achieving proficiency in any language, particularly in Arabic, where precise verbal communication is essential. This study investigates the design, implementation, and evaluation of Arabic speaking skills instruction at Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro, aiming to identify best practices and areas for improvement. The research addresses three key questions: how lecturers prepare and comprehend their teaching plans, the effectiveness of various learning designs and strategies, and the challenges students encounter in mastering speaking skills. A qualitative approach was employed, involving interviews with lecturers and observations of speaking classes. The data analysis technique was a qualitative data analysis technique from Miles and Huberman include condensation, display, and verification for conclusion. Findings indicate significant variability in lecturer preparation, with some relying heavily on curriculum materials and others primarily on the syllabus, leading to discrepancies in instructional quality. The design of learning plans also varies, with proactive and reactive approaches affecting the coherence of the teaching process. In implementation, inconsistencies were found in the use of multimedia resources and the emphasis on practical speaking activities, resulting in gaps in student engagement and practice opportunities. Challenges faced by students, particularly in vocabulary and fluency, highlight the need for a more integrative teaching approach that combines grammar, vocabulary, and real-life communication tasks. The study concludes that improving Arabic speaking skills instruction at Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro requires enhanced lecturer preparation, diverse teaching methods, and more effective assessment strategies. Addressing these issues could significantly improve instructional quality and student outcomes in Arabic language proficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Alsabbagh, Amany, and Al-Shaimaa M. Al-Rashidy. “The Effectiveness of Using Animated Storytelling Technique for Developing Speaking Skill.” International Journal of Instructional Technology and Educational Studies 4, no. 2 (April 1, 2023): 44–62. https://doi.org/10.21608/ihites.2023.246956.1167.

Arifi, Qatip. “Humanistic Approach in Teaching Foreign Language (from the Teacher Perspective).” European Scientific Journal, ESJ 13, no. 35 (December 31, 2017): 194. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n35p194.

Biggs, John. “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment.” Higher Education 32, no. 3 (October 1996): 347–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871.

Bot, Kees de. “The Psycholinguistics of the Output Hypothesis.” Language Learning 46, no. 3 (September 27, 1996): 529–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01246.x.

Cain, A., J. Grundy, and C.J. Woodward. “Focusing on Learning through Constructive Alignment with Task-Oriented Portfolio Assessment.” European Journal of Engineering Education 43, no. 4 (July 4, 2018): 569–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1299693.

Capp, Matthew James. “The Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning: A Meta-Analysis of Literature between 2013 and 2016.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 21, no. 8 (August 3, 2017): 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074.

Cuddapah, Jennifer L., and Christine D. Clayton. “Using Wenger’s Communities of Practice to Explore a New Teacher Cohort.” Journal of Teacher Education 62, no. 1 (January 27, 2011): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110377507.

Eberly, Mary B., Sarah E. Newton, and Robert A. Wiggins. “The Syllabus as a Tool for Student-Centered Learning.” The Journal of General Education 50, no. 1 (2001): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2001.0003.

Elfeky, Abdellah Ibrahim Mohammed, Thouqan Saleem Yakoub Masadeh, and Marwa Yasien Helmy Elbyaly. “Advance Organizers in Flipped Classroom via E-Learning Management System and the Promotion of Integrated Science Process Skills.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 35 (March 2020): 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100622.

Fernandez, Kenneth E. “Evaluating School Improvement Plans and Their Affect on Academic Performance.” Educational Policy 25, no. 2 (March 24, 2011): 338–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904809351693.

Graaf, Arjan de, Hanna Westbroek, and Fred Janssen. “A Practical Approach to Differentiated Instruction: How Biology Teachers Redesigned Their Genetics and Ecology Lessons.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 30, no. 1 (January 2, 2019): 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1523646.

Halian, Ihor, Olena Halian, Liudmyla Gusak, Halyna Bokshan, and Ihor Popovych. “Communicative Competence in Training Future Language and Literature Teachers.” Revista Amazonia Investiga 9, no. 29 (May 18, 2020): 530–41. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.29.05.58.

Halim, Shanjida, and Tanzina Halim. “Usefulness and Learnability in Teaching Vocabulary to ESL/EFL Students.” Global Research in Higher Education 2, no. 1 (January 28, 2019): 65. https://doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v2n1p65.

Helt, Richard C. “Developing Communicative Competence: A Practical Model 1.” The Modern Language Journal 66, no. 3 (September 20, 1982): 255–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06986.x.

Ito, Kinji, and Shannon M. Hilliker. “Acquisition of Japanese through Translation.” In Rethinking Directions in Language Learning and Teaching at University Level, 53–74. Research-publishing.net, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.31.891.

Loschky, Lester. “Comprehensible Input and Second Language Acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, no. 3 (September 7, 1994): 303–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100013103.

Masgoret, A.–M., and R. C. Gardner. “Attitudes, Motivation, and Second Language Learning: A Meta–Analysis of Studies Conducted by Gardner and Associates.” Language Learning 53, no. 1 (March 10, 2003): 123–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00212.

Meng, Shengrong. “Enhancing Teaching and Learning: Aligning Instructional Practices with Education Quality Standards.” Research and Advances in Education 2, no. 7 (July 2023): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2023.07.04.

Moats, Louisa. “What Teachers Don’t Know and Why They Aren’t Learning It: Addressing the Need for Content and Pedagogy in Teacher Education.” Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 19, no. 2 (July 3, 2014): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2014.941093.

Oxford, Rebecca L., Roberta Z. Lavine, and David Crookall. “Language Learning Strategies, the Communicative Approach, and Their Classroom Implications.” Foreign Language Annals 22, no. 1 (February 1989): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb03139.x.

Pellicer-Sánchez, Ana, Elsa Tragant, Kathy Conklin, Michael Rodgers, Raquel Serrano, and Ángels Llanes. “Young Learners’ Processing Of Multimodal Input And Its Impact On Reading Comprehension.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42, no. 3 (July 15, 2020): 577–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000091.

Preston, Courtney. “University-Based Teacher Preparation and Middle Grades Teacher Effectiveness.” Journal of Teacher Education 68, no. 1 (January 20, 2017): 102–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116660151.