Peer Assessment in Facebook Comment Column about One Topic in Writing II Subject of the Fourth Semester Students of Sriwijaya University English Study Program

Authors

  • Rita Inderawati Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5982-1071
  • Ahmad Hafiz Pratama Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia
  • Bambang A. Loeneto Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v2i1.459

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to find out (1) the completeness of the students’ comments on Facebook, (2) the quality of the students’ comments, and (3) the percentage of how well the students identified the characters of a good paragraph. The population of this study was the fourth-semester Palembang class students of English Education Study Program 2013 of Sriwijaya University. The sample of the study was 48 students that were selected by using total sampling technique. The data were collected from the students’ comments on Facebook of Writing II class in the academic year 2015 and analyzed by using two rubrics containing scoring systems. The results showed that the completeness in giving comments on the Facebook group could be categorized into a very good category with the final score was 10. While, the quality of the comment from the students was also Good with the final score was 15.56. The percentage of how well the students identified the characters of a good paragraph was 83.33% in very good level, 10.41 % in good level and 6.25 % in average level. Overall, the final score of the students’ comments from those three research questions were average with the score was 9.85. It can be concluded that the students’ comments on Facebook Comment Column in Writing II Class in the academic year 2015 was average. Keywords: academic writing; Facebook; peer comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES

Andrade, H. & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159-181.

Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P. Y,. & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior. 27, 37-43.

Depdiknas. (1990). Sistem pendidikan nasional Peraturan Pemerintah No. 28. Jakarta, Indonesia: Depdiknas RI. Retrieved from http://www.dpr.go.id/

Fajri, M.H., Inderawati, R., & Mirizon, S. (2015). The implementation of peer editing technique to improve students‟ writing achievement. Journal of English Literacy Education, 2(2), 48-57.

Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Retrieved from http:/respository.upi.edu/operator/upload/t_bing_0604416_chapter1.pdf

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Harris. (1997). Recommendations for writing comments on student papers. Retrieved from http://www.virtualsalt.com/comments.htm

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487. Retrieved from http://rer.sagepub.-com/content/77/1/81.full.pdf+html

Hur, G. (2011). Facebook: It’s not all evil. Use the group feature! A paper presented at CAMTESOL 2011 State Conference. Retrieved from http://homepage.smc.edu/-Liuroseanney/CATESOL%202011/facebook.pdf

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Inderawati, R. (2015). Commenting on the peer comment for single academic paragraph writing. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/groups-/539438949492702/?ref=-bookmarks

Inderawati, R. (2016). A reflection on peer comment strategy in facebook for ELT. Retrieved from http://www.conference.pixel-online.net.

McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger students’ motivation and higher achievement. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext-/EJ815370.pdf

Mertler, A. C. (2001). Practical assessment, research and evaluation: Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Retrieved from http://pareonline.-net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (1999). Writing academic English (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Adison-Wesley Longman.

Phelan, C., & Wren, J. (2005). Exploring reliability in academic assessment. Retrieved from https://www.uni.edu/chfasoa-/reliabilityandvalidity.htm

Rambe, P. (2010). Cited in Rambe, P. (2012). Critical discourse analysis of collaborative engagement in facebook postings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 295-314.

Rambe, P. (2012). Critical discourse analysis of collaborative engagement in facebook postings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 295-314.

Spring (1999). Academic studies English; Writing longer essays. Retrieved from http://www.en.copian.ca/library/learning/academic/english/writing/essayIng/module10.p df

Subandowo, D. (2013). Grammatical error analysis of student’s comment writing based on facebook game in English intensive class of STAIN Jurai Siwo Metro. (Unpublished graduate thesis) STAIN Jurai Siwo Metro, Lampung.

Wichadee, S. (2013). Peer feedback on facebook: The use of social networking websites to develop writing ability of undergraduate students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 14(4), 1-13.

Winter, T. (1999). Academic studies English; Writing paragraphs and the writing process.

The National Adult Literacy, 2, 1-28.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Inderawati, R., Hafiz Pratama, A., & A. Loeneto, B. (2018). Peer Assessment in Facebook Comment Column about One Topic in Writing II Subject of the Fourth Semester Students of Sriwijaya University English Study Program. ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 2(1 June), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v2i1.459

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 June (2018): ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education provides scientific manuscripts of research results in the field of English Language and Education. This issue has been available online since 30th June 2018. All articles in this issue (05 original research articles) were authored/co-authored by 9 authors from 4 affiliations and 1 country (Indonesia).

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).