Cohesive Devices Used in Argumentative Essays of Undergraduate EFL Students in Indonesia

Dewi Warna, Beni Wijaya, Eka Sartika, Winny Agustia Riznanda

Abstract


ABSTRACT

This study analyzed qualitatively the cohesive devices used in argumentative essays of undergraduate EFL students in South Sumatera, Indonesia. Eighty essays were collected from eight universities in which ten essays were obtained from each. Halliday and Hasan (1976) concept of grammatical cohesion was used as the framework for the analysis of the essays. All the cohesive devices were found. Reference had the highest frequency which is 50.24% of the total cohesive devices followed by conjuction which is 37.34%, lexical cohesion which is 7.7% and ellipsis which is 3.57%. Substitution was the least used type of cohesive device which is only 1.15%. In terms of correctness of using the devices, most of the devices were all used properly. It was revealed that there was still few mistakes of using reference and substitution since they both were frequently used in the essays. Hence, it can be concluded that the students are more familiar with the use of reference and conjunction even though they are able to use the other devices as well.

Keywords: cohesive devices, argumentative essay


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adiantika, H. N. (2015). Cohesive devices in EFL students expository writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 4(1). Retrieved from https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEE.

Alarcon, J.B. & Morales, K.N.S. Grammatical cohesion in students argumentative essay. Journal of English and Literature, 2(5), 114-127. Retrieved from: www.academicjournals.org/ijel

Axelrod, R.B., & Cooper, C. R. (1988). The St. Martins guide to writing. New York, NY: St. Martins Press.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16 (4), 479-488.

Cho, H. Y., & Shin, J. (2014). Cohesive device in English Writing Textbooks and Korean Learners English Writings. English Teaching. 69(1). 41-59.

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication.

Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. (2010). Academic literacy: The Importance and impact of writing across the curriculum-a case study. Journal of the Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning, 10(2), 34-47. Retrieved from www.iupui.edu/~josotl.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.

Hasan, M.R. 2005. Cohesive features in written discourse: An analysis of narrative essays of S2 students of English language education program of the state university of malang. Unpublished Thesis. Malang: State University of Malang.

Hasannejad, M. R, Assadi, N., Kazemi, A. S., Kohgiluyeh & Ahmad, B. (2012). Substitution as a device of grammatical cohesion in English contexts. The Journal of Applied Linguistics,(5)1.

Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Hung, D. M., & Thu, V. T. (2014). Vietnamese learners attention and use of cohesive device in English essay writing at Dong Thap University. Asian Journal of Educational Research 2(2). 1-14.

Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London, UK: Pearson Education.

Hyland, K. (1990). A genre-description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal. 21(1), 66-78.

Irwin, J. W. (1982). Cohesion and comprehension. Illinois Reading Council Journal. Newark, DL: International Reading Association.

Markels, R.B. (1984). A new perspective on Cohesion in Expository Paragraphs. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Mohamed, N. (2016). Use of conjunctions in argumentative essay by ESL undergraduates. e-Academia Journal UiTMT, 5(1). 1-13.

Olateju, M. A. (2006). Cohesion in ESL classroom written texts. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15(3), 314-331.

Palmer, J. C. (1999). Coherence and cohesion in the English language classroom: The use of lexical reiteration and pronominalisation. RELC Journal, 30(2).

Podis, J.M., & Podis, L.A. (1996). Rethinking writing. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Ruetten, M.K., & Smalley, R.L. (1994). Refining composition skills. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Sparks,J. (2007). The Advanced Writing Handbook for ESOL. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.

Walsh, K. (2010). The importance of writing skills: Online tools to encourage success. Retrieved from http://www.emergingedtech.com




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/ef.v3i02.1164

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Dewi Warna, Beni Wijaya, Eka Sartika, Winny Agustia Riznanda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

INDEXED BY:

CrossrefMorarefGoogle ScholarDimensionsIndonesia One SearchAcademia.Edu



free web stats English Franca's Visitors


Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

@ ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education

Jl. Dr. AK Gani No 1 Dusun Curup, Rejang Lebong Regency, Bengkulu Province, Indonesia, 39119.

Dr. Eka Apriani, M.Pd., email: efranca@iaincurup.ac.id, eka.apriani@iaincurup.ac.id.