Dharar as a Reason for Divorce Lawsuit in Fiqh and Legislation of Some Muslim Countries: Study on Indonesia, Bahrain, Sudan, Qatar, and Morocco
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.3368Keywords:
Dharar, divorce, legislation, qÄnÅ«nAbstract
This paper aims to explain dharar as a reason for divorce in the legislation of five Muslim countries, namely Indonesia, Bahrain, Sudan, Qatar, and Morocco. The five countries were chosen with consideration of representing the Sunni Islamic School and one Shia Islamic School. The approach used is a normative approach combined with a comparative method of the law. Primary legal materials are acts and other legislation relevant to the topic of discussion. The results show that the five countries equally provide room for divorce for the wife if she is experiencing dharar, the judge or hakam is obliged to reconcile the two disputing spouses, dharar includes physical and psychological, and the accusation must be proven using evidence generally applicable in procedural law. As for the difference, only Indonesia emphasizes cruelty and physical abuse, while other countries are general. Morocco is the most complete in regulating dharar as a reason for divorce and has several specifics such as violating the marriage agreement which is categorized as dharar. Morocco also regulates compensation due to á¸arar suffered by the wife, while the other four countries do not discuss it in their family law.
Downloads
References
Al-Farisi, Samirah, Nurullah Kurt, and Mohd Bakhit Hj Ali, Alqawa'id Al-mundarijah tahta qa'idah la dharara wa la dhirara wa tathbiqatuha fi al-masail al-thibiyyah ALBASIRAH JOURNAL 9, no. 2 (December 31, 2019): 67–80
Anser, Layachi. “Divorce in the Arab Gulf Countries: A Major Challenge to Family and Society.†In Contemporary Issues in Family Studies, edited by Angela Abela and Janet Walker, 59–73. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118320990.ch5.
'Aud bin Husen Magram Al syahri, Qa'idah la Dharara wa la dhirara fi al-fiqh al-Maliki fi quthtub an nawadzil "32", no. 4 (July 1, 2020): 1428–64, https://doi.org/10.21608/jfsu.2020.111761.
Ayat Syawisy DalÄ«lah. Inha` Ar-RÄbiá¹ah Az-Zaujiyah Bi Ṭalab Az-Zaujah DirÄsah MuqÄranah Bain al-Fiqh al-IslÄmÄ« Wa QÄnun al-Usrah al-Jazairi Wa Ba’á¸u at-Tasyrī’at al-AḥwÄl Asy-Syakhá¹£iyyah al-‘Arabiyyah. Tizi Wizu: Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Politik Universitas MaulÅ«d Ma’mari, 2014.
Baharuddin, A. Zamakhsyari, and Rifqi Qowiyul Iman. “At-Tafrîq Al-Qadhâ’i And The Religious Courts’ Authority In Deciding A Divorce.†Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 20, no. 1 (June 27, 2020): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v20i1.3493.
Busriyanti. “Maqasid Al-Syari’ah Dalam Penegakkan Hukum Lalu Lintas Di Indonesia | Busriyanti | Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam,†2021. http://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alistinbath/article/view/2470.
Haniah Ilhami. “Interpretation of Syiqaq and Its Procedural Law at Religious Court in Yogyakarta". Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada.†Accessed March 25, 2022. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/16060.
Hursh, John. “Advancing Women’s Rights through Islamic Law: The Example of Morocco.†Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice 27 (2012): 252.
Izzah, Ibnu. “Nusyuz and Its Solutions in Compilation of Islamic Law From The Perspective of The Al-Quran.†Jurnal Al-Dustur 4, no. 1 (June 9, 2021): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.30863/jad.v4i1.1420.
Jumhuriyah al-Sudan -Qanun li Sanah 1991- 24/7/1991 24 / 7 / 1991,†n.d. http://site.eastlaws.com/GeneralSearch/Home/ArticlesTDetails?MasterID=201670.
Kharlie, Ahmad Tholabi dkk. Kodifikasi Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
Miti Yarmunida & Busra Febriyani. “Kedudukan Talak Di Pengadilan Perspektif Siyasah Syar’iyah.†4, no. 2 (2019): 257.
Muhammad al-Faruji. Mudawwanah Al-Usrah. DÄr Al-Baiá¸a’: Maá¹ba’ah al-Najah al-JadÄ«dah, 2012.
Nagar, Samia al-, and Liv Tønnessen. “Family Law Reform in Sudan: A Never Ending Story?†CMI Brief 2018:08 (2018). https://www.cmi.no/publications/6581-family-law-reform-in-sudan-a-never-ending-story.
Nurlaelawati, Euis. “Muslim Women in Indonesian Religious Courts: Reform, Strategies, and Pronouncement of Divorce.†Islamic Law and Society 20 (2013): 242.
“Peran Hakam (Juru Damai) Dalam Mengatasi Perceraian (Studi Di Jabatan Kehakiman Syari’ah Pulau Pinang, Malaysia) | Armiadi | El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga.†Accessed March 25, 2022. https://www.jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/usrah/article/view/5563.
Qanun Raqm (22) li Sanah 2006 bi Isdhar Qanun al-Usrah†Accessed March 25, 2022. https://lloc.gov.bh/HTM/K1917.htm.
Qanun Raqm (22) li Sanah 2006 bi Isdhar Qanun al-Usrah†Accessed March 25, 2022. https://almeezan.qa/LawPage.aspx?ID=2558.
Rahmawati, Anita. “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan : Kritisisme Atas UU No. 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang KDRT.†PALASTREN Jurnal Studi Gender 7, no. 1 (March 31, 2016): 79–102. https://doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v7i1.999.
Russell Jones, Sandy. “God’s Law or State’s Law: Authority and Islamic Family Law Reform in Bahrain.†Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations, August 13, 2010. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/186.
Subhan, Moh. “Rethinking Konsep Nusyuz Relasi Menciptakan Harmonisasi dalam Keluarga.†Al-’`Adalah : Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam 4, no. 2 (December 10, 2019): 194–215. https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v4i2.542.
Sugianto, Sugianto. “Membangun Lemma Ekonomi Islam Berbasis Qawâ’id al-Fiqhiyah (Studi Kasus adh-Dharar yuzaal).†HUMAN FALAH: Jurnal Studi Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam 1, no. 1 (July 28, 2016): 1–16.
Usman, Ibtisam Khalil, Al-tathliq li ad-Dharar wa al-Asal al-Mutaratthabah ‘Alaihi (Dirasah Muqaranah wa Muqarabah Baina al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Qanun Raqm â€8†Sanah 1984 M wa ta’dilatuh), Thesis, University of Zawia , 2021), http://dspace.zu.edu.ly/xmlui/handle/1/1045.
Wahbah az-Zuhaili. Al-Fiqh al-IslÄmÄ« Wa Adillatuhu. Vol. VIII. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 1985.
Wuzarah Al-‘Adl. DalÄ«l ‘Amali Li Mudawwanah al-Usrah. Rabat: Jam’iyyah Al-Ma’lÅ«mah Al-QÄnuniyyah wa al-QadhÄ’iyyah, 2004.
Yusuf Dziyab Muhammad & ash-Shaqr. “Mabda` At-Ṭalaq Li Ad-Ḍá¸arar ‘Inda al-MÄlikiyah MuqÄranah Bi QawÄnin al-AḥwÄl Asy-Syakhá¹£iyyah al-Mu’Āṣirah.†Majallah Kulliyyah DÄr Al-‘UlÅ«m, JÄmi’Ah al-FayyÅ«m 36 (2014): 247–48.
Zaelani, Qodir Zaelani Qodir. “Pembaruan Hukum Keluarga: Kajian atas Sudan – Indonesia.†Al-’Adalah 10, no. 1 (2012): 331–42. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v10i1.280.
Zulkifli, Suhaila. “Putusnya Perkawinan Akibat Suami Menikah Tanpa Izin Dari Istri.†Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 18, no. 3 (April 15, 2019): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1184.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).