Analysis of the Bengkulu Administrative Court Decision Number 01/G/SPPU/2019/PTUN.BKL regarding the Determination of Legislative Candidates by the Seluma Regency General Elections Commission (KPU) from the Perspective of Siyasah Qadhaiyyah

Authors

  • Etry Mike Faculty of Sharia, UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Abdul Rosyid Alkharomi Faculty of Sharia, UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v5i1.16623

Keywords:

Administrative Court, General Elections Commission, Legislative Candidates, Siyasah Qadhaiyyah, Electoral Disputes

Abstract

This study examines a dispute concerning the determination of a legislative candidate by the General Elections Commission (Komisi Pemilihan Umum/KPU) of Seluma Regency, which culminated in Decision No. 01/G/SPPU/2019/PTUN.BKL of the Bengkulu Administrative Court (Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara/PTUN). The dispute involved Maskun, S.E., a legislative candidate representing the National Awakening Party (Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa/PKB), who challenged the decision of the Seluma Regency KPU to revoke his candidacy. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations underlying the judges’ decision and to examine the decision from the perspective of Siyasah Qadhaiyyah. This study employs normative legal research using a library research approach, examining relevant laws and regulations, judicial decisions, books, scholarly literature, and other relevant legal sources. The findings indicate that the Bengkulu Administrative Court carefully considered the applicable legal provisions by upholding the principles of justice and equality before the law, while providing legal protection for the political rights of the aggrieved party. The decision also reflects the principles of judicial independence and transparency in the adjudication process. From the perspective of Siyasah Qadhaiyyah, the decision aligns with judicial independence, equality before the law, transparency, and the protection of individual rights. Therefore, resolving the dispute through the Administrative Court demonstrates the compatibility between applying positive law and the values of justice recognized in Islamic law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Fauza Marpaung, Zaid, et al. Re-Voting for The Election of Regents and Deputy Regents (Analysis Study of The Constitutional Court Decision Number: 58/Php. Bup-Xix/2021 Siyasah Qadhaiyah Perspective). Journal Equity of Law and Governance, 2024, 6.1: 113-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/elg.6.1.10668.113-120.

Asnani, Multi Sri. Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Penegakan Hukum Dan Rekonstruksi Keadilan Dalam Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Penerbit NEM, 2025.

Harsono, JUMARDI. “Perubahan Kewenangan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Terhadap Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum.” Jurnal Panji Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum, 2019.

Hilmy, Gustian Hafizh. “Pertimbangan Hakim PTUN Surabaya Pada Sengketa Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Perspektif SIYASAH Qadhaiyyah (Studi Putusan Nomor 32/G/KI/2021/PTUN. SBY).” Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2024.

Huda, Miftakhul. “Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Putusan Hakim Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Studi Pada Pengadilan Agama Di Wilayah Hukum PTA Surabaya.” UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2024.

Jamil, Jamil. “Evaluasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum Dalam Perspektif Konstruksi Hukumnya.” Perspektif 25, no. 1 (2020): DOI: https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v25i1.744

Novita Sari, D E A, Busman Edyar, and Habiburrahman Habiburrahman. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Kode Etik Dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim Dalam Perspektif Siyasah Syar’iyyah.” INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (IAIN) CURUP, 2024.

Riza, Dola. “Hakikat KTUN Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Vs Undang-Undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan.” Soumatera Law Review 2, no. 2 (2019):

———. “Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Undang-Undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 3, no. 1 (2018):

Rizky, Ghina Aulia, Muhammad Afriza Rifandy, Muhammad Ferdy Hasan, and Lisnawati Lisnawati. “Kaidah-Kaidah Khusus Siyasah Qadhaiyyah.” Tadhkirah: Jurnal Terapan Hukum Islam Dan Kajian Filsafat Syariah 2, no. 2 (2025):

Safitri, Erna Dwi, and Nabitatus Sa’adah. “Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2021):

Sajian, Aldi, and Ardan Alif. “Sengketa Pertanahan Dan Peran Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penyelesaiannya: Analisis Hukum Agraria.” SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum 3, no. 4 (2024):

Saleh, Indah Nur Shanty, Nurul Widhanita Y Badilla, Apriyanto Apriyanto, and Dian Pranata Depari. Buku Referensi Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia: Proses, Hak, Dan Keadilan. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2024.

Setiawan, Deni, and Siti Rodhiyah Dwi Istinah. "Executorial Power of State Administrative Court Decisions Associated with General Principles of Good Government." Jurnal Daulat Hukum 6.3 (2023): 251-268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v6i3.32081

Siboy, Ahmad, et al. "The effectiveness of administrative efforts in reducing state administration disputes." Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System (JHCLS) 2.1 (2022): DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i1.23.

Sulaeman, Eman Achmad, et al. "Reconstruction of the Absolute Competence of Civil Courts in the Settlement of Unlawful Acts by the Government in Indonesia." Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change (2025): DOI: https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i3.2661

Sulistiani, Siska Lis. Peradilan Islam. Bumi Aksara, 2021.

Susiani, Dina. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum.” Penerbit Tahta Media, 2024.

Taufik, Ade Irawan. “Keputusan Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (Bumn) Sebagai Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 3, no. 2 (2020):

Ugiasari, Loecy Farlia, Alvi Dwi Arianda, Muflihan Diniyyah Putri, Lina Noviati, Sonia Anugrah Putri, Yunita Pratama Sari, Tri Hendra, Devi Rama Utami, Wiji Wijayanto, and Laura Purnama. SEJARAH PERADABAN ISLAM. Penerbit Berseri, 2025.

Ulumiyah, Miftakhus Sifa’Bahrul. “Perkembangan Hukum Dan Pengadilan Pada Era Abbasiyah.” Qurthuba: The Journal of History and Islamic Civilization 3, no. 2 (2020):

Wahab, Awal Rifai, Asni Asni, and Muh Saleh Ridwan. “Peradilan Islam Pada Masa Rasulullah Dan Khulafaurasyidin: Studi Komparatif Peradilan Islam Era Klasik.” BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2022):

Yuslim, S H. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Mike, E., & Alkharomi, M. A. R. (2026). Analysis of the Bengkulu Administrative Court Decision Number 01/G/SPPU/2019/PTUN.BKL regarding the Determination of Legislative Candidates by the Seluma Regency General Elections Commission (KPU) from the Perspective of Siyasah Qadhaiyyah . NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 5(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v5i1.16623

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check