Judicial Rechtsvinding in the Absence of Legal Norms: A Case Study on the Revocation of Child Adoption in Indonesia

Authors

  • Abd. Rahmad Faculty of Law, Tamansiswa Padang University, Indonesia
  • Joni Zulhendra Faculty of Law, Tamansiswa Padang University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v5i2.14642

Keywords:

Adoption Revocation, Argumentum a Contrario, Judicial Interpretation, Legal Vacuum, Rechtsvinding

Abstract

In Indonesia, the legal framework provides a regulatory basis for the adoption of children, but remains silent on the possibility and procedure for revoking such adoption. This article examines the role of judicial rechtsvinding (legal discovery) in resolving legal disputes in the absence of explicit statutory norms, with a focus on the revocation of child adoption in Indonesia. Drawing on a case study of Decision No. 410/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Bdg issued by the Bandung District Court, the study analyzes how the judge employed the method of argumentum a contrario to construct legal reasoning that justified the cancellation of a legally recognized adoption. The analysis reveals that the court integrated both juridical and sociological considerations, placing the child’s best interests at the center of its decision. This case illustrates how judicial discretion can function as a form of normative governance, especially in areas of law where legislative silence prevails. It also underscores the evolving role of the judiciary in shaping family law jurisprudence and filling legal gaps with ethically grounded reasoning. The findings contribute to the discourse on judicial activism, progressive legal interpretation, and child protection in civil law systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustine, Oly Viana, Susi Dwi Harijanti, Indra Perwira, and Widati Wulandari. “Constitutional Review of Criminal Norms: Does Indonesia Need Judicial Activism?” The International Journal of Human Rights 27, no. 4 (April 2023): 772–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2023.2185608.

Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Hukum Progresif Dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, Dan Relevansi.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (June 2018): 159–85. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185.

Bigge, David. “Rule of Law Without International Courts.” The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 21, no. 3 (November 2022): 483–97. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341487.

Crafa, Silvia. “From Legal Contracts to Legal Calculi: The Code-Driven Normativity.” Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 368 (September 2022): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.368.2.

Denzin, Norman K, and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009.

Fernando, Youngky. “Acts against Civil Law versus Acts Against Criminal Law Versus Rechtsvinding HogeRaad/Supreme Court Judge.” Journal Equity of Law and Governance 3, no. 1 (March 2023): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.55637/elg.3.1.6608.58-71.

Hafidz, Jawade. “The Juridical Analysis of Court Decisions Regarding Adopted Children in Their Position as Single Heirs.” Jurnal Akta 8, no. 4 (December 2021): 214–21. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v8i4.18631.

Helland, Hege Stein. “Tipping the Scales: The Power of Parental Commitment in Decisions on Adoption from Care.” Children and Youth Services Review 119 (December 2020): 105693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105693.

Hicks, Alexander. “Transparency, Compliance, And Contestability When Code Is(n’t) Law.” Proceedings of the 2022 New Security Paradigms Workshop, October 24, 2022, 130–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584318.3584854.

Jarrah, Mashal Mufleh, Safa Hakem Mestarih, and Ghazi Ayed Alghathian. “Judicial Interpretation of Legal Texts: A Study in Jordanian Legislation.” Cogent Social Sciences 10, no. 1 (December 2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2354359.

Lestari, Amanda Dea, and Bustanuddin. “Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi: Memahami Fenomena Holistik Penemuan Hukum (Rechtsvinding) Yang Progresif.” Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law 1, no. 1 (March 2021): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22437/limbago.v1i1.8635.

Locke, Daniel, and Guido Zuccon. “Case Law Retrieval: Problems, Methods, Challenges and Evaluations in the Last 20 Years.” arXiv:2202.07209. Preprint, arXiv, February 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.07209.

Longo, Erik. “Time and Law in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The Usefulness of Experimental Law.” Erik Longo, ahead of print, September 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000062.

Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. “Arguments of Statutory Interpretation and Argumentation Schemes.” International Journal of Legal Discourse 2, no. 1 (April 2017): 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0002.

Maria, Burhan Sidabariba. “Impacts of Living Law on Judges’ Decisions in Civil Disputes in North Sumatera.” Russian Law Journal 11, no. 4 (June 2023): 536–44. https://www.russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2496.

McEwan-Strand, Amy, and Marit Skivenes. “Children’s Capacities and Role in Matters of Great Significance for Them.” The International Journal of Children’s Rights 28 (August 2020): 632–65. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02803006.

Miller, Sondra. “Judicial Discretion and the Voice of the Child in Resolving Custody Disputes: Comments on the Think Tank Report.” Family Court Review 52, no. 2 (2014): 198–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12083.

Natalya, Shkileva. “The Principle of Best Interests in the Concept of the Constitutional and Legal Status of Children Left without Parental Care.” Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2023, no. 1 (June 2023): 42–45. https://doi.org/10.36511/2078-5356-2023-1-42-45.

Negara, Tunggul Ansari Setia. “Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches.” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 4, no. 1 (February 2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855.

Nggilu, Novendri M., Zulkifli Zulkifli, Yassine Chami, Indra Perwira, and Ali Abdurahman. “The Absence of Judicial Review on Constitutional Amendments in Indonesia: Urgency and Legal Reform for Constitutional Safeguards.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 6, no. 2 (April 2025): 659–92. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i2.20888.

Peirone, Franco. “The Rule of the Present, Not the Past.” Jus Cogens 3, no. 3 (October 2021): 229–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-021-00045-2.

Purwendah, Elly Kristiani, Seguito Monteiro, Rusito Rusito, Eti Mul Erowati, and Agoes Djatmiko. “Civil Justice as An Option for Fulfilling Environmental Justice Through The Principles of Ius Curia Novit and Rechtsvinding.” Justitia Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 1 (April 2022): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v7i1.12808.

Putriyanti, Ayu. “Synchronization Between Act of Governance Administration and Act of Administrative Court to Develop Good Governance.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Ethics in Governance (ICONEG 2016), Atlantis Press, December 2016, 85–88. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconeg-16.2017.20.

Ridwan, Mahlil. “The Practice of Child Adoption without Court Determination.” Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies 10, no. 1 (March 2024): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v10i1.20213.

Rohman, Moh Mujibur, Nashrul Mu’minin, Mowafg Masuwd, and Elihami Elihami. “Methodological Reasoning Finds Law Using Normative Studies (Theory, Approach and Analysis of Legal Materials).” MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, December 27, 2024, 204–21. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i2.3379.

Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah, Mahendra Harun Ar Rasyid, Alfian Rasyidi, and Wisnu Andriawan. “Originalist Interpretation: A Method of Discovery in Criminal Law (Rechtsvinding in Het Strafrecht).” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) 4, no. 3 (August 2021): 5632–43. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2360.

Situmorang, Septriono, Nurini Aprilianda, and Lucky Endrawati. “Legal Discovery Through Judicial Activism By Judges In Criminal Cases.” Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law 4, no. 01 (February 2025): 38–46. https://talenta.usu.ac.id/Mahadi/article/view/19724.

Sugiharto, Gatot, Mira Julita Sari, Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny, and Fauzan Muhammadi. “Analysis Of Legal Discovery Methods By Judges In Rechterlijk Pardon’s Perspective to Solve Criminal Cases.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 14, no. 1 (June 2024): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i1.4397.

Sujono, Imam. “Urgency of Rechtsvinding and Jurisprudence in the Constitutional Court Authority.” Journal of Constitutional Law Society 1, no. 2 (September 2022): 161–78. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v1i2.26.

Varadan, Sheila. “The Principle of Evolving Capacities under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.” The International Journal of Children’s Rights 27 (May 2019): 306–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02702006.

Yusra, Dhoni. “Politik Hukum Hakim Dibalik Penemuan Hukum (Rechtsvinding) dan Penciptaan Hukum (Rechtsschepping) pada Era Reformasi dan Transformasi.” Lex Jurnalica 10, no. 2 (2013): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v10i2.354.

Zito, Ferdinand. “The Child’s Best Interests … or near Enough? A Lawyer’s Perspective.” Children Australia 35, no. 2 (January 2010): 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200001073.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Rahmad, A., & Zulhendra, J. (2025). Judicial Rechtsvinding in the Absence of Legal Norms: A Case Study on the Revocation of Child Adoption in Indonesia . NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 5(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v5i2.14642

Citation Check