Analysis of the Constitutional Court's Authority to Change the Age Requirements for Presidential Candidates and Vice Presidential Candidates in the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v4i2.11579Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Judicial Review, Presidential Age RequirementsAbstract
This study analyzes the authority of the Constitutional Court in changing the age requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates through Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. The main focus of this research is qualitative research, with a literature study approach which examines a theory or decision to examine the legal basis and authority of the Constitutional Court in conducting a judicial review of the age requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates in article 169 letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections against the 1945 Constitution. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and analytical approach. The results of the study show that the Constitutional Court's decision violates the principle of separation of powers and judicial activism.
Downloads
References
Ach. Rubaie, 2017, Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi Presfektif Filosofis, Teoritis Dan Yuridis. surabaya: LaksBang PRESSindo Yogyakarta dan Kantor Advokat “Hufron & Rubaie, Yogyakarta.
Bagir Manan, 2005, DPR, DPD dan MPR dalam UUD 1945 Baru, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Erli Salia, 2017, Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia, Tunas Gemilang Pers, Palembang, hlm 130.
Geofani Milthree Saragih,et.el, 2023, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Praktik Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap UU 45, PT Raja Frafindo Persada, Depok.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Cetakan Kedua, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jakarta.
Maruarar Siahaan, 2021, “Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Mardian Wibowo, 2017, Makna Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Dalam Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi, Disertasi, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Martitah, 2013, Mahkamah Konstitusi dari Negative Lagislature ke Positive Legislature, Konpress, Jakarta.
Mohamad Mahfud MD, 2010, Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Konstroversi Isu, Cetakan Kedua, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Mohamad Mahfud MD, 2012, Konstitusi dan Hukum Dalam Kontroversi Isu, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Mohammad Mahrus Ali, 2019, Tafsir Konstitusi, Menguji Konstitusionalitas dan Legalitas Norma, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok.
Muhammad Alief Farezi Efendi, et.el, 2023, “Positive Legislature Decisions by the Constitutional Court: Putusan Positive Legislature Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Jurnal Konstitusi, volume 20, no.4, Jakarta.
Ni’matul Huda, et.el, 2019, Formulasi Konsep Tindak Lanjut Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Mengatur, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta.
Radita Ajie, 2018, “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, volume 13, no. 2, Jakarta.
Soimin dan Mashuriyanto, 2013, Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia, UII Pers, Yogyakarta.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 07/PUU-II/2004
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 006/PUU-III/2005
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 010/PUU-III/2005
Putusan Mahakamah Kosntitusi Nomor 31/PUU-XI/2013
Putusan Mahakamah Kosntitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XI/2013
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor Nomor 29/PUU-XXI/2023
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor Nomor 51/PUU-XXI/2023
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor Nomor 55/PUU-XXI/2023
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023
Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 2/MKMK/L/11/2023
Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 3/MKMK/L/11/2023.
Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 4/MKMK/L/11/2023
Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 5/MKMK/L/11/2023
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Tentang Tata Beracara dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Burmansyahtia Darma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a 
