The Effect Of Corporate Governance And Political Connections On The Application Of Conditional Conservatism (Study On Non-Financial Companies Registered In Indonesian Stock Exchange In 2012-2018)

Authors

  • Herawansyah Herawansyah Universitas Pat Petulai
  • Rini Indriani Universitas Negeri Bengkulu
  • Nadine Nathasya Sitorus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/disclosure.v1i1.3201

Keywords:

Corporate governance, political connections, conditional conservatism

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of corporate governance and political connections on the application of conditional conservatism. The sample in this study are non-financial companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2012-2018. The number of samples in this study were 82 non-financial companies. Data analysis was performed with multiple regression analysis. The result of study showed that board of commissioner, audit committee size, audit committee independence, and institutional ownership have an effect on conditional conservatism. This study also has a result that political connections have a negatif influence on conditional conservatism. It means more higher the companies have indicated by political connections, the lower the application of conditional conservatism. Variable board of director, independence commissioner, auditor expertise, the quality of the accounting firm which is proxied by BIG4, and managerial ownership have no effect on conditional conservatism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achyani, F., Triyono, & Wahyono. (2015). Pengaruh Praktik Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Manajemen Laba Sebagai Variabel Intervening. University Research Colloqium, 172–187.

Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting Conservatism and Board of Director Characteristics: an Empirical Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.887301

Anggraeni, R. (2018). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik Terhadap Tax Aggressiveness. Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Padang.

Arrazzaq, G. P. (2017). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance, Leverage dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi di Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2012-2015. Artikel Ilmiah. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Basu, S. (1997). The Conservatism Principle and The Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25, 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1

Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003

Desanti, E. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan dan Koneksi Politik terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Undergraduate Thesis.

El-haq, Z. N. S. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial , Kepemilikan Institusional , Growth Opportunities , dan Profitabilitas terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. 11(2), 315–328.

Emirzon, J. (2007). Prinsip- prinsip Good Corporate Governance Paradigma Baru dalam Praktik Bisnis Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Press.

Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704

Faccio, M., Dinç, S., Djankov, S., Fisman, R., Giannetti, M., Green, R., … Stolin, D. (2010). Differences between Politically Connected and Nonconnected Firms: A Cross-Country Analysis. Financial Management, (1), 905–927.

Fitriani, S. (2014). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Dian Nuswantoro.

García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2009). Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(1), 161–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1

Givoly, D, & Hayn, C. K. (2000). The Changing Time-Series Properties of Earnings, Cash Flows and Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 287–320.

Givoly, Dan, & Hayn, C. (2002). Rising Conservatism: Implications for Financial Analysis. Financial Analysts Journal, 58(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v58.n1.2510

Haniati, S., & Fitriany. (2010). Pengaruh Konservatisme Terhadap Asimetri Informasi Dengan Menggunaan Beberapa Model Pengukuran Konservatisme.

I Wayan, P. (2015). Tingkat Konservatisme Akuntansi: Kajian Dewan Komisaris, Modal Manajerial, Dan Komite Audit Dalam Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(1), 93–110.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). The Theory of The Firm: Manajerial Behaviour, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.l218

Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2–3), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002

Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance. (2011). Pedoman Good Corporate Governance Perusahaan Konsultan Aktuaria Indonesia. Http://Www.Knkg-Indonesia.Org/Dokumen/Pedoman-GCG-Konsultan-Aktuaria.Pdf, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833e77c9

Kootanaee, A. J., Seyyedi, J., Nedaei, M., & Kootanaee, M. J. (2013). Accounting Conservatism and Corporate Governance’s Mechanisms: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economics, Business and Finance, 1(10), 301–319. Retrieved from http://ijebf.com/

LaFond, R., & Roychowdhury, S. (2007). Managerial Ownership and Accounting Conservatism. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.929693

LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2007). The information role of conservatism. Accounting Review, 83(2), 447–478. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447

Lara, J. M. G., Osma, B. G., & Penalva, F. (2007). Board of directors’ characteristics and conditional accounting conservatism: Spanish evidence. In European Accounting Review (Vol. 16). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701706922

Lo, E. W. (2005). Pengaruh tingkat kesulitan keuangan perusahaan terhadap konservatisme akuntansi. Makalah Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII, (September), 15–16.

Mohammed, N. F., Ahmed, K., & Ji, X.-D. (2017). Accounting Conservatism, Corporate Governance and Political Connections. Asian Review of Accounting Asian Review of Accounting Asian Review of Accounting, 25(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-04-2012-0017

Nasr, M. A., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Corporate governance mechanisms and accounting conservatism: evidence from Egypt. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(3), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2017-0108

Novitasari, S., Ratnawati, V., & Silfi, A. (2016). Pengaruh Manajemen Laba, Corporate Governance, dan Intensitas Modal Terhadap Agrevisitas Pajak Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Property dan Real Estate yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode Tahun 2010-2014). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 4(1), 1901–1914.

Olyhoek, K. (2017). Accounting conservatism and the Audit Committee. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00336.x

Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. (2002). the Quality of Earnings , and Stock Returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237–264.

Prastowo, Y. (2019). Kasus Garuda dan Misteri Akuntansi. Retrieved from https://money.kompas.com/read/2019/07/18/152000526/kasus-garuda-dan-misteri-akuntansi?page=all

Putri, I. Y. (2016). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI 2012-2014.

Rachman, F. F., & Afriyadi, A. D. (2020). Rekayasa Akuntansi di Jiwasraya Terkuak.

Rifai, B. (2009). Peran Komisaris Independen Dalam Mewujudkan Good Corporate Governance Di Perusahaan Publik. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(3), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss3.art5

Rizqiasih, P. D. (2010). Pengaruh Struktur Governance Terhadap Fee Audit Eksternal. In Skripsi.

Rohadi, D. (2018). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance , Profitabilitas , Leverage Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Konservatisme.

Ruch, G. W., & Taylor, G. (2015). Accounting conservatism: A review of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34, 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.02.001

Sari, C., & Andhariani, D. (2009). Konservatisme Perusahaan di Indonesia dan Faktor Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII.

Sari, D. (2016). Pengaruh Konservatisme Akuntansi, Voluntary Disclosure dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Earnings Response Coefficient Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Unpas Bandung, 16–54.

Shleifer Andrei and Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal Of Finance, Vol. 52, pp. 737–783.

Veres, M. (2013). 183538-ID-none. 2(1), 1–17.

Wardhani, R. (2008). Tingkat Konservatisme Akuntansi di Indonesia dan Hubungannya dengan Karakteristik Dewan sebagai Salah Satu Mekanisme Corporate Governance. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI, Pontianak (23-24 Juli), XI, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Watkins, A. L., Hillson, W., & Morecroft, S. E. (2004). Audit Quality : A Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 153–193.

Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.207

Wu, W., Wu, C., Zhou, C., & Wu, J. (2012). Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.005

Downloads

Published

2021-09-02

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).