Proses Berpikir Calon Guru Matematika dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Transformasi Berdasarkan Teori John Dewey

Authors

  • fauzanah fauzanah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kudus, Indonesia
  • Putri Nur Malasari Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kudus, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/ja.v6i2.10692

Keywords:

Thought process, Transformation geometry, John Dewey theory

Abstract

Understanding the thinking process of students has great significance, how students face and solve transformation geometry problems not only reflects the understanding of concepts, but also the ability to think systematically, creatively, and logically. The purpose of this study is to find out how the thinking process used by prospective mathematics teachers helps them solve transformation geometry problems. In-depth research on the thinking process of mathematics students in the context of solving transformation geometry problems by utilising John Dewey's theory is expected to provide valuable insights in the development of mathematics education. Descriptive qualitative research method was used in this study. The research subjects were 3 mathematics education students at one of the universities in Kudus Regency. The instruments of this research are mathematical problem solving ability test and interview guidelines. Data analysis method which includes collection, presentation, reduction, and conclusion. The results of the data analysis process based on John Dewey's theory are that the subject is able to understand the problem, define the problem, able to develop a solution if the first solution is not proven, able to test several solutions if there is inaccuracy in the first solution and the subject is able to take the best hypothesis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aini, N. (2023). Pengaruh Self Efficacy terhadap Kemamp Pemecahan Masalah geometri. Edumath, 16. Retrieved from https://ejournal.stkipjb.ac.id/index.php/math/article/view/3409.

Alfillaili, E., & Iffah, J. D. N. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah. Conference on Research and Community Services, September, 231–240. Retrieved from https://ejournal.stkipjb.ac.id/index.php/CORCYS/article/view/1631.

Bossé, M. J., Lee, T. D., Swinson, M., & Faulconer, J. (2010). The NCTM process standards and the five Es of science: Connecting math and science. School science and mathematics, 110(5), 262-276.

Bradbury, J. (2010). Why is Teaching with Problem Solving Important to Student Learning? Nctm, 13(12), 1–6. Retrieved from https://www.washoeschools.net/cms/lib/NV01912265/Centricity/Domain/253/Math K-6/NCTM research brief.pdf.

Fathurrahman, M., Permanasari, A., & Siswaningsih, W. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Keterampilan Problem Solving Siswa SMA pada Pokok Bahasan Stoikiometri Larutan. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 1(1), 62–75. Retrieved from https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/EduChemia/article/view/440.

Fuady, A. (2017). Berfikir Reflektif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JIPMat, 1(2). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v1i2.1236.

Garrison, J. W., Neubert, S., & Reich, K. (2012). John Dewey's philosophy of education: An introduction and recontextualization for our times. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jainuri, M. (2014). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa Prodi Matematika. Igarss. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.

Kusuma, R. V., Hidayanto, E., & Chandra, T. D. (2022). Proses Pemecahan Masalah Trigonometri Berdasarkan Teori John Dewey Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 1830–1845. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1403.

Polya, G. (2014). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton university press.

Purwanto, W. R., Sukestiyarno, Y., & Junaedi, I. (2019). Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Persepektif Gender. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES, 895–900. Retrieved from https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/snpasca/article/view/390.

Rahmat, T. (2019). Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika IAIN Bukittinggi dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Math Educa Journal, 3(1), 98–108. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15548/mej.v3i1.272.

Rianto, V. M., Yusmin, E., & Nursangaji, A. (2017). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Berdasarkan Teori John Dewey Pada Materi Trigonometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Untan, 6(7), 194562. Retrieved from https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/20924.

Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif Ahmad Rijali UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. 17(33), 81–95. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331094976_ANALISIS_DATA_KUALITATIF.

Sari, A. D., Hastuti, S., & Asmiati, A. (2020). Pengembangan Model Creative Problem Solving (CPS) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 1115–1128. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.318.

Sari, D. N. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Sma Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika.(Doctoral dissertation, Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP-UKSW).

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (27th ed.). Alfabeta.

Syahri, A. A., Hikmah, S. N., & Rara, K. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Berdasarkan Teori John Dewey Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (AL KHAWARIZMI), 4(1), 6–12. Retrieved from https://www.jurnalstkipmelawi.ac.id/index.php/KJPM/article/view/1674.

Yunaeti, N., Arhasy, E. A., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Peserta Didik Menurut Teori John Dewey Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 3(1), 10–21. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.37058/jarme.v3i1.2212.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-21

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Edisi November

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2024 fauzanah fauzanah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with ARITHMETIC: Academic Journal of Math agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).