Animal Rights In Islam: Sarra Tlili's Criticism of the Anthropocentric Reading of the Qur'an

Authors

  • Muhammad Yasser Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Daarul Fatah Tanggerang Selatan, Indonesia
  • Alven Putra Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Yusuf Qardlawi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i3.9660

Keywords:

Sarra Tlili, Anthropocentric Readings, Animal Rights, Animals in Qur'an

Abstract

This study raises the theme of criticism of anthropocentric readings implemented in the Qur'an, as Sarra Tlili often voices in his various scientific works and seminars. As commonly known, anthropocentrism (the dominant paradigm of the modern age) is receiving widespread criticism because it is considered the root of the global environmental crisis and various forms of violence against animals. Anthropocentric reading of the Qur'an itself has given birth to a biased view of nature and non-human animals so that they are only assessed from the aspect of their use for human interests (instrumentalism) as God's golden children (favoritism). As an alternative, Tlili (re)promotes theocentrism and ecocentrism which are considered more in line with the cosmology of the Qur’an. This research itself uses the hermeneutic verstehen method and active reading techniques which are carried out on various works of Tlili regarding the research theme. This research concludes that it is necessary to reinterpret some of the core concepts in the Qur'an as Tlili did so that it does not give rise to biased views of nature and various forms of violence against non-human animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, Junaidi. "Deconstruction of Anthropocentric Interpretation: An Analysis of Environmentally Minded Verses." KALAM 8, no. 1 (July 1, 2014): 65. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v8i1.168.

Adler, Mortimer J. dan Charles van Doren, How to Read a Book, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1972).

Foltz, Richard C., Animals In Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures, (Oxford: Oneworld, 2006).

Goodman, Lenn E. dan Richard McGregor, (ed.), The Case of Animals Versus Man Before the King of Jinn, (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

Hardiman, F. Budi. Modern Thought: From Machiavelli to Nietzche, (Depok: Canisius, 2019).

Ja'far Subhani, Quranic Tourism: Tafsir Verse-Metaphor Verse, (Jakarta: Al-Huda, 2007).

Keraf, A. Sonny. Environmental Philosophy: Nature as a System of Life, (Depok: Kanisius, 2014).

Keraf, A.Sonny. Environmental Ethics, (Jakarta: Kompas, 2010).

Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an (ed.). Tafsir Ilmi. First printing. Jakarta: Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Agency for Research and Development & Training, Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf al-Qur'an, 2012.

Masri, Basheer Ahmad, The Islamic Welfare in Islam, (Nairobi: The Islamic Foundation, 2007).

Nagel, Thomas. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review 83, no. 4 (October 1974): 435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Yasser, M., Putra, A., & Qardlawi, M. Y. (2024). Animal Rights In Islam: Sarra Tlili’s Criticism of the Anthropocentric Reading of the Qur’an. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 8(3), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i3.9660

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check