The Crown Witness From the Point of View of Islamic Criminal Law in Truth Discovery of Criminal Cases in Indonesia

Authors

  • Joni Zulhendra Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • Firdaus Firdaus Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • Hardi Putra Wirman Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6918

Keywords:

Crown Witness, Islamic Criminal Law, Criminal Case

Abstract

This article aims to elucidate  Islamic criminal law's point of view on the existence of crown witnesses in the truth discovery of criminal cases in Indonesia. In fulfilling the shortage of witness evidence, one of the perpetrators of the crime was carried as a case witness in the case. This study uses normative research methods by reviewing books relevant to the problem (Library Research) by tracing, comparing, and analyzing normative doctrinal law through a qualitative approach regarding crown witnesses. This study found that Islamic criminal law requires fairness to be accepted as a witness. If a crown witness is indeed needed as evidence to reveal a criminal case without being accompanied by other supporting evidence, then a crown witness is permitted. Should there is other evidence, the crown witness will be disqualified because the crown witness does not meet fair requirements. The rule of law in Indonesia based on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) article 185 paragraph 2 states that the statement of one witness is insufficient to prove a criminal case called the principle of unus testis nullus testis (one witness is not a witness). Therefore, there are no other witnesses apart from the crown witness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd. Azis, Muhammad Sofyan, Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, 2nd edn (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2017)

Abi Umar Yusuf bin Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Abdul Birry al-Qurtuby, Al-Kafi Fi Fiqh Ahlul Madinah al-Maliki (Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Ilmiyat, tt)

Abu Luis Ma’luf al-Yusu’i, Al-Munjid Fi al-Lughat, III (Beirut: Dar al-Masyriq, 1977)

Adipatni, Sang Ayu Ditapraja, and I Wayan Sutarajaya, ‘Eksistensi Saksi Mahkota Kaitannya Dengan Splitsing Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana’, 2019

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015)

———, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008)

F Siregar, Hendrik, ‘Perlindungan Hak Tersangka Dari Keterangan Saksi Yang Tidak Dapat Dipercaya’, RECHTSREGEL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1.1 (2018) <https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v1i1.1925>

Fauzan, Fauzan, ‘Alternatives to Criminal Conviction in a Comparative Analysis of Positive Law and Islamic Criminal Law’, Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7.1 (2022), 185 <https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4308>

Firdaus, Achmad Saifudin, and Gousta Feriza, ‘Kedudukan Terdakwa Sebagai Saksi (Saksi Mahkota) Terhadap Terdakwa Lain Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Acara Pidana’, 12 (2015)

H.A. Djazuli, Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih (Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah-Masalah Yang Praktis) (Jakarta: Kencana, 2006)

Harefa, Safaruddin, ‘Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia Melaui Hukum Pidana Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam’, University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 4.1 (2019), 35–58 <https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.4.1.35-58>

Imam Jalaluddin al-Suyuty, Al-Asybat Wan Nadhair Fi Qawaid Furu al-Syafi’i (Semarang: Thoha Putra, tt)

Lili Rosita, Hari Sasangka, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003)

Lilik Mulyadi, Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana : Teori, Praktik, Teknik Penyusunan Dan Permasalahannya (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007)

Loebby Loqman, ‘Saksi Mahkota’, Forum Keadilan, 1995, 11 edition

Marwan Efendi, Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Tinjauan Terhadap Beberapa Perkembangan Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Referensi, 2011)

Mohammad Nazir, Metode Penelitian (Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2005)

Muchlis Usman, Kaidah-Kaidah Ushuliyah Dan Fiqhiyah (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1999)

Mulizar, Mulizar, Asmuni Asmuni, and Dhiauddin Tanjung, ‘Maqashid Sharia Perspective of Legal Sanction for Khalwat Actors in Aceh’, Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7.1 (2022), 161 <https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.3587>

Nafisah, Lailiyatun, and Mohammad Muhtador, ‘Wacana Keadilan Shahabat Dalam Pandangan Ulama Klasik Dan Kontemporer’, AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 2.2 (2018), 153 <https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v2i2.429>

Nashoha, Ahmad, Yusefri Yusefri, and Sri Wihidayati, ‘Kesaksian Non Muslim Dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Curup Nomor 571/Pdt. G/2016’, Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5.2 (2020), 271 <https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v5i2.1837>

Rahman, Habibie, Lilik Purwastuty, and Dessy Rakhmawati, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Mahkota dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana’, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1.3 (2021), 120–38 <https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11088>

Setiyawan, Deni, ‘Kedudukan Saksi Mahkota Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Di Persidangan Berdasarkan Asas Non Self Incrimination’, 2021

Soerodibro, R. Sunarto Soerodibroto, KUHP Dan KUHAP Dilengkapi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Dan Hoge Raad (Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013)

Suari, Ni Made Elly Pradnya, I Made Minggu Widyantara, and Ni Made Sukaryati Karma, ‘Kedudukan dan Perlindungan Saksi Mahkota dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar)’, Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1.1 (2020), 210–15 <https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2213.210-215>

Sumariartha Suara, I Putu Gede, ‘Reformulasi Kewenangan Penuntut Umum Terhadap Penerapan Saksi Mahkota Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 6.3 (2018), 369 <https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2017.v06.i03.p08>

Tobroni, Imam Suprayoga, Metode Penelitian Sosial - Agama (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2003)

Wanto, Deri, Rahmad Hidayat, and R. Repelita, 'Maqasid Shariah's Change as Theory: From Classical to Contemporary Maqasid Shariah', Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6.2 (2021), 427 <https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v6i2.3122>

Yonea, Gremy Meika, Dwi Putri Saragih, Ira Prawati Siburian, and Mazmur Septian Rumapea, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Kedudukan Saksi Verbalisan Dalam Perkara Pidana’, Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10.2 (2021), 190 <https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v10i2.1726>

Yuhermansyah, Edi, ‘Urgensi Perlindungan Saksi Dalam Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2006’, LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum, 1.2 (2017) <https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v1i2.1427>

Zulfan, ‘The Crown Witness and the Protection of Human Rights in Criminal Law Verification’, in Emerald Reach Proceedings Series (Emerald Publishing Limited, 2018), I, 519–24 <https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00080>

Downloads

Published

16-05-2023

How to Cite

Zulhendra, J., Firdaus, F., & Wirman, H. P. (2023). The Crown Witness From the Point of View of Islamic Criminal Law in Truth Discovery of Criminal Cases in Indonesia. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 8(1 May), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6918

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 May (2023)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).