The Effectiveness of Mobile Court Implementation in Manado Religious Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.3809Keywords:
Mobile court, religious court, effectivenessAbstract
This article discusses the implementation of the mobile Court conducted by the Manado Religious Court. This research is qualitative field research using empirical legal methods. The aim is to determine the dominant factors that affect the effectiveness of the mobile court conducted by the Manado Religious Court. By using the Legal System theory proposed by Lawrence M. Friedman, the author tries to unravel the problems that often arise in the mobile court process. The results of the study indicate that there is a significant relationship between the knowledge and awareness of justice seekers who use the judiciary, especially the Religious Court. The success implementation of mobile courts is due to the coordination and readiness of judicial infrastructure, including efforts to socialize the practice of mobile courts to related agencies, which are enhanced to achieve the goals of implementation of the mobile court.
Downloads
References
Ali, Ahmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudende) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2009.
Asmawi, Asmawi. “Konseptualisasi Teori Maslahah.†SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 1, no. 2 (2014).
“Badan Pusat Statistik.†Accessed November 30, 2021. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/23/183/1/jumlah-penduduk-miskin-menurut-wilayah.html.
Bedner, AW, JAC Vel - Law, undefined Social, and undefined 2010. “An Analytical Framework for Empirical Research on Access to Justice.†Scholarly publications …, n.d.
Chamanda, Muh. Nasharuddin. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Kaitannya Dengan Asas Sederhana, Cepat, Dan Biaya Ringan (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Sungguminasa Kelas II B Tahun 2013-2015).†UIN Alauddin, 2016.
Daraba, Dahyar. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin Di Kecamatan Polongbangkeng Utara.†Agustus 10, no. 2 (2015): 160.
Fauzi, Muhammad Latif. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Wonogiri).†Al-'Adalah 14 (December 30, 2018): 367. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v14i2.2057.
Firdaus. Ushul Fiqh : Metode Mengkaji Dan Memahami Hukum Islam Secara Komprehensif. Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Haditsah, and Annur. “Klasifikasi Masyarakat Miskin Menggunakan Metode Naive Bayes.†Ilkom 10, no. 2 (2018): 160.
Jiang, Weijiang, and Jun Ye. “Decision-Making Method Based on an Improved Similarity Measure between Vague Sets.†Proceeding 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design: E-Business, Creative Design, Manufacturing - CAID and CD’2009, 2009, 2086–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIDCD.2009.5374873.
Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas RI. “Strategi Nasional Akses Pada Keadilan 2016-2019.†Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/BAPPENAS RI, 2016, 5–6.
Khallaf, Abdul Wahab. Ilmu Ushul Fiqh Terj. Nur Iskandar Albarsany Kaedah-Kaedah Hukum Islam. 8th ed. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2002.
Kusmayanti, Hazar, Sherly Ayuna Putri, and Linda Rahmainy. “Praktik Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Pengadilan Agama Melalui Sidang Keliling Dikaitkan Dengan Prinsip Dan Asas Hukum Acara Perdata.†ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 4, no. 2 (May 1, 2019): 145. https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I2.83.
Kusmayanti, Hazar, Eidy Sandra, and Ria Novianti. “Sidang Keliling Dan Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Acara Perdata: Studi Pengamatan Sidang Keliling Di Pengadilan Agama Tasikmalaya.†Jhaper.Org 1, no. 2 (2015).
Lahilote, Hashim Sofyan, Wulanmas A P G Frederik, J Ronald Mawuntu, Abdurrahman Konoras, and Phd Student. “The Litigation Aspects in Solving Banking Disputes in the Sharia Sector,†2019. https://doi.org/10.7176/PPAR.
Lahilote, Hasyim. “Legal Transplant in the Substance of the Authority of Religious Courts in Indonesia.†Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, January 2020. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/93-14.
Lawrence M. Friedman. Sistem Hukum : Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Edited by M. Khozim and Nurainun Mangunsong. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2018.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Laporan Tahunan 2020 Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia: Optimalisasi Peradilan Modern Berkelanjutan, 2021.
Manado, BPS. “Kota Manado Dalam Angka 2021,†2021.
Mekka, Marzuki, Imran Ismail, and Sitti Aminah. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Penerapan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan Agama Sengkang.†Jurnal Ada Na Gau: Public Administration 2, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 323–30.
Minahasa, BPS Kabupaten. “Kabupaten Minahasa Dalam Angka 2020.†Tondano, 2020.
Miradj, Safri, and Sumarno Sumarno. “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin, Melalui Proses Pendidikan Nonformal, Upaya Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Sosial Di Kabupaten Halmahera Barat.†Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat 1, no. 1 (2014): 101. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppm.v1i1.2360.
Muwahid, Fahmi, and Riyan Ramdhani. “Batasan Waktu Perkawinan Dalam Perkara Isbat Nikah Pada Sidang Keliling Di Pengadilan Agama Cianjur.†Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Peradilan Islam 1, no. 1 (September 2, 2020): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.15575/AS.V1I1.7800.
Nuraini, Eneng, and Dewi Mayaningsih. “Implikasi Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Ciamis Terhadap Peningkatan Kesadaran Penyelesaian Perkara.†Varia Hukum 1 (2019): 21–44.
PA Manado. “Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Tahun 2020,†2018.
“Perma1tahun2015.Pdf,†n.d.
“Sensus Penduduk 2020 - Badan Pusat Statistik.†Accessed November 30, 2021. https://sensus.bps.go.id/main/index/sp2020.
Sidik, Muhammad. “Implementasi Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pelayanan Terpadu Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Pulang Pisau.†Jurnal Sosial Sains 1, no. 8 (August 15, 2021): 800–818. https://doi.org/10.36418/SOSAINS.V1I8.177.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.
“Statistik Perkara – Pengadilan Agama Manado.†Accessed December 5, 2021. https://pa-manado.go.id/statistik-perkara/.
Steers, Richard M. Managing Effective Organizations. Boston Kent Publishing, 1985.
Sumner, Cate, and Santi Kusumaningrum. “Studi Dasar AIPJ Tentang Identitas Hukum : Jutaan Orang Tanpa Identitas Hukum Di Indonesia,†2014.
Tunggal, Amin Widjaya. Manajemen : Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1993.
Utara, BPS kabupaten Minahasa. “Kabupaten Minahasa Utara Dalam Angka 2021.†Airmadidi, 2021.
Wilda, AA, Z Zainuddin - JISRAH: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu, and undefined 2021. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Menangani Perkara Itsbat Nikah Di Pengadilan Agama Sawahlunto Kelas II.†Ojs.Iainbatusangkar.Ac.Id, n.d.
William N. Dunn. “Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Pulblik.†Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2003.
Zahrah, Muhammad Abu. Ushul Fiqih : Muhammad Abu Zahrah; Penerjemah Saefullah Ma’shum. Pustaka Firdaus, 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed | Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International | Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg)
