Negotiating Sharia, Customary Law, and Gender: Feminist Legal Pluralism in the Learo Tradition of Marriage in the Bintauna Community, Indonesia

Rizal Darwis; Nurul Mahmudah; Ahmad Faisal; Muhammad Syakir Al Kautsar; Ahmad Fathan Aniq

doi:10.29240/jhi.v11i1.14890

Authors

Rizal Darwis Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
Nurul Mahmudah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
Ahmad Faisal Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
Muhammad Syakir Al Kautsar Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
Ahmad Fathan Aniq McGill Univeristy, Montreal, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v11i1.14890

Keywords:

Learo Tradition, Women’s Body Politics, Feminist Legal Pluralism

Abstract

The learo tradition in marriage among the Bintauna community of Indonesia reflects the tension between Islamic law, customary law and gender equality. While this practice symbolically honours women, it simultaneously enforces a discriminatory public virginity test, causing psychological distress and gender inequality. This study aims to analyse the learo tradition as a space for negotiation between Sharia law and customary law, to uncover power relations and the politics of women’s bodies, and to propose a framework of feminist legal pluralism centred on women’s voices. This qualitative research was conducted in Bintauna Sub-district (May–July 2023) using semi-structured interviews with 18 respondents (religious leaders, customary leaders, ritual leader (inang), academics, and women practising the tradition) and non-participant observation at five learo ceremonies. Thematic analysis was conducted using a feminist legal pluralism framework. The findings indicate: (1) the function of virginity testing within the learo tradition exceeds the bounds of valid customary (‘urf shahih) as it contradicts cover up a fault (saturul ‘aib) and the objectives of Islamic (law maqashid of sharia); (2) this practice reinforces patriarchy by imposing purity tests solely on women, causing trauma and stigma; (3) women (the ritual leader and the bride) have limited but strategic agency in quietly negotiating the rituals. The contribution of this research is to provide an operational framework for feminist legal pluralism based on three pillars: living customary normativity, locally reinterpreted Islamic legitimacy, and dialectical power relations. This framework offers adaptive transformation without erasing tradition, by recommending the abolition of virginity tests, the privatization of rituals, and full inclusivity for all prospective brides and grooms

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfitri, Alfitri. “Protecting Women from Domestic Violence: Islam, Family Law, and the State in Indonesia.” Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies 27, no. 2 (2020): 273–308. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v27i2.9408.

Alhusni, Siti Adibah Binti Mohmad Jeofrey, and M. Zaki. “Islamic Law and Customary Law in the Prohibition of Sogit Marriage in Sabah, Malaysia.” Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society 1, no. 1 (2025): 86–98. https://doi.org/10.64929/ilsiis.v1i1.8.

Araújo, Sara. “Law as Imagination: Feminist Rethinkings of Legal Pluralism.” Onati Socio-Legal Series 15, no. 6 (2025): 1897–1921. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2210.

Azhari, Doni, and Asmuni. “The Politics of Reform in Islamic Family Law and Its Impact on Gender Equality.” Usraty: Journal of Islamic Family Law 3, no. 1 (2025): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.30983/usraty.v3i1.8721.

B, Samsudin Buamona. “Kaidah Al-Adatu Muhakkamah: Konsep, Aplikasi, Dan Relevansi Dalam Dinamika Hukum Islam Kontemporer.” Al-Mizan: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ekonomi 10, no. 02 (2024): 171–84. https://e-jurnal.staibabussalamsula.ac.id/index.php/al-mizan/article/view/192/168.

Chisango, Tadios, and Thokozile Mayekiso. “An Investigation of the Sexist Application of the Morality Concept of Tsika in the Shona Culture of Zimbabwe.” International Journal of Psychology 48, no. 6 (2013): 1237–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2013.766745.

Endendijk, Joyce J., Maja Dekovic, Helen Vossen, Anneloes L. van Baar, and Ellen Reitz. “Sexual Double Standards: Contributions of Sexual Socialization by Parents, Peers, and the Media.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 51 (2022): 1721–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02088-4.

Ilmiati, Lazimatun Nazhifah, Muhammad Iqbal, Ma’adul Yaqien Makkarateng, and Lukman Arake. “Unveiling Gender Disparities in Legal Traditions: A Study of Deferred Mahar within Customary Law.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah Volume 17, no. 1 (2025): 204–23. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v17i1.30466.

Imiefoh, Andrew Ikhayere, and Evis Garunja. “The Role of Cultural Education in Shaping Succession Laws in Nigeria: Bridging Tradition and Modernity.” Kiu Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2026): 162–79. https://doi.org/10.59568/KIULJ-2026-8-1-10.

Korolova, Jelena, Oksana Kovzele, Ilze Kacane, and Maija Grizane. “Transformations of Old Believer Wedding Rites in Latvia: The Case of Latgale.” Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics 15, no. 2 (2021): 159–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/jef-2021-0022.

Kusniati, Retno. “Free, Prior, and Informed Consent Principles as Indigenous Peoples’ Right: Soft Law or Hard Law?” Jambe Law Journal 7, no. 1 (2024): 169–93. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.7.1.169-193.

Lestari, Putri Ayu. “Reclaiming Faith and Justice: A Narrative Review of Islamic Feminism.” Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 3 (2024): 176–89. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v2i3.608.

Lestariani, Ida Ayu Komang Dina, Luh Putu Sendratari, and I Ketut Margi. “Bias Gender Pada Sistem Perkawinan Nyerod (Studi Kasus Di Dusun Munduk, Desa Banjar, Buleleng, Bali) Dan Potensinya Sebagai Sumber Belajar Sosiologi Kelas XI.” JPSU: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Undiksha 1, no. 3 (2019): 327–33. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpsu.v1i3.26850.

Maluleke, MJ. “Culture, Tradition, Custom, Law and Gender Equality.” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 15, no. 1 (2012): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v15i1.1.

Masenge, Winda Daeng. “Adat Learo Dalam Pernikahan Masyarakat Busisingo.” Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, 2014. https://repository.ung.ac.id/skripsi/show/231409026/adat-learo-dalam-pernikahan-masyarakat-busisingo.html.

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2014.

Mokodenseho, Apriyanto, and Umar Jaya M. “The Mo Learo Tradition in Pre Marriage to the Community Sangkub District, North Bolaang Mongondow Regency on Islamic Law Perspective.” Al-Mizan 13, no. 1 (2017): 69–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v13i2.908.

Munala, Leso, Esther Mwangi, Margaret Harris, Nene Okunna, Bethlehem Yewhalawork, and Maureen Ong’ombe. “‘I Was Forced into It’: The Continued Violation of Widows from the Luo Community of Kenya through Sexual Cleansing Rituals.” Frontiers in Global Women’s Health 3, no. August (2022): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.942635.

Naeem, Muhammad, Wilson Ozuem, Kerry Howell, and Silvia Ranfagni. “A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22, no. October (2024): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789.

Nchanji, Eileen Bogweh, Mercy Mutua, Collins Odhiambo, Yvonne Kiki Nchanji, and David Karanja. “Deconstructing Leisure Time and Workload: Case of Women Bean Producers in Kenya.” Agriculture and Food Security 10, no. 1 (2021): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00286-w.

Nofialdi, Syukri Iska, Zainuddin, Fitri Yenti, and Mualimin Mochammad Sahid. “‘Urf, Gender, and Customary Law: Negotiating Women’s Participation in Boar Hunting in Minangkabau, Indonesia.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 25, no. 2 (2025): 279–303. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i2.281-303.

Nurhaliza, Puan, Lily Andayani, and Aliesa Amanita. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tradisi Kawin Tangkap Di Sumba Di Tinjau Dari Uu Perkawinan.” Jurnal Rechtswetenschap 1, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.36859/rechtswetenschap.v1i1.2366.

Nwabuaku, Kanu Winifred, and Kanu Catherine Chiugo. “Methodological Challenges of Fieldwork in Indigenous Communities of Africa: A Systematic Review.” African Quarterly Social Science Review 2, no. 3 (2025): 299–306. https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.2.3.26.

Nwokike, Chidi Emmanuel. “Widowhood Cleansing Rituals In Mbaukwu: Implications for Policy Makers.” Social Science Research Network (SSRN), 2017. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3092072.

Participants in the Community Engagement and Consent Workshop. “Consent and Community Engagement in Diverse Research Contexts: Reviewing and Developing Research and Practice.” J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 8, no. 4 (2013): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.1.

Pesambili, Joseph C. “Towards Culturally Responsive Ethical Research: Insights from an In-Depth Study of the Indigenous.” AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 21, no. 4 (2025): 729–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801251374143.

Rammohan, Anu, and Meliyanni Johar. “The Determinants of Married Women’s Autonomy in Indonesia.” Feminist Economic 15, no. 4 (2009): 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700903153989.

Rizal, Fitra. “Penerapan ‘Urf Sebagai Metode Dan Sumber Hukum Ekonomi Islam.” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 1, no. 2 (2019): 155–76. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v1i2.167.

Rofiq, Nur. “Gender, Faith, and Reform: A Narrative Review of Islamic Feminism and Public Policy.” Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 2 (2024): 66–81. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v2i2.600.

Sarah, Sarah, M Adi Saputra, Firdaus Akbar, and Syahriati Fakriah. “Pluralisme Hukum Dan Keadilan Gender Dalam Penetapan Nafkah Istri Di Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 3 (2025): 6–11. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.12707.

Shesa, Laras, Jalaluddin, Harry Yuniardi, Muhammad Kholid, and Henny Septia Utami. “Flexibility of Rejang Semendo System in Modern Marriage.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al- Syir’ah 23, no. 2 (2025): 245–64. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v23i2.3595.

Sidik, Farkhan Maulana. “The Practical Benefits of Legal Anthropology in Achieving Social and Cultural Justice in Society.” Education of Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2025): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.21831/edulaw.v1i2.1705.

Simanjuntak, Jansen Edinata, Mompang L. Panggabean, John Pieris, and Wiwik Sri Widiarty. “Customary Law and Multiple Legal Systems in Criminal Justice: Indonesia’s Penal Reform Experience.” Architectural Image Studies 6, no. 3 (2025): 1864–80. https://doi.org/10.62754/ais.v6i3.528.

Supriyadi, and Nik Abdul Rahim Nik Abdul Ghani. “Negotiating Tradition and Modernity: The Practice of Prohibiting Marriage in the Month of Suro among Javanese Muslims in South Lampung.” Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 4, no. 2 (2025): 114–28. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17340470.

Syahril, Muh. Akbar Fhad, Zainuddin Zainuddin, Anatolijs Krivins, Wiwin Wiwin, Nurhaedah Hasan, and Hardi Lestari Adi Hafid. “Reconstructing Women’s Status in Mowea Sarapu: Customary Divorce, Maqasid Al-Shari’ah, and Gender Justice in Tolaki Muslim Legal Pluralism, Indonesia.” Jurnal Theologia 36, no. 2 (2025): 311–26. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2025.36.2.29864.

Syamanta, Talita, Indri Meiliawati, Rizky Ayu, Sri Windani, and Bismar Siregar. “Towards Feminist Justice: Reforms and Challenges in Islamic Courts for Gender Equality and Women’s Rights.” Syariat: Akhwal Syaksiyah, Jinayah, Siyasah and Muamalah 1, no. 1 (2024): 36–57. https://doi.org/10.35335/g9drrx81.

Taak, Sangeeta. “The Intersection of Customary Law and Women’s Rights in Developing Jurisdictions: A Critical Analysis of Legal Pluralism and Constitutional Reform in Africa and Asia.” International Journal of Judicial Science Research Studies (IJJSRS) 2, no. 3 (2025): 56–60. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16916853.

Wahyuni, Komang Ayu Sri, I Wayan Budiarta, Kadek Nita Junianti, Ketut Sri Muliani, Desak Ketut Rina Wulandari, Desak Putu Astina Wulandari, Ni Kadek Rika Suntariani, and Ni Made Amelia Dwitayanti. “Women’s Gender Bias in the Nyerod Marriage System in Banjar Village.” SHS Web of Conferences 221 (2025): 02009. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522102009.

Wahyuni, Sri, Putri Ananda Saka Siregar, and Rahmatullah. “Neglecting Islamic Law in the Distribution of Inheritance in the Sasak Muslim Society: A Study of Legal Pluralism.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 20, no. 1 (2026): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v20i1.14987.

Wood, Hannelie J. “Gender Inequality: The Problem of Harmful, Patriarchal, Traditional and Cultural Gender Practices in the Church.” HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies 75, no. 1 (2019): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i1.5177.

Wutich, Amber, Melissa Beresford, and H. Russell Bernard. “Sample Sizes for 10 Types of Qualitative Data Analysis: An Integrative Review, Empirical Guidance, and Next Steps.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 23 (2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241296206.

Zubaidah, Siti, Musakkir, Syamsuddin Muchtar, Wiwie Heryani, and Ahmad Masum. “Integrating Tradition into Legal Reform: Reconstructing the Role of Reconciliatory Customary Judges in Diversion Processes within the Interplay of Islamic , Customary, and National Law.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi, Dan Keagamaan 12, no. 02 (2025): 447–61. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.9709.2.