Adkar Change Management Model to Enhance the Use of LMS in Lectures: Does it Work?

M. Rezeki Muamar; Danny Meirawan; Munir; Endang Herawan; Rahmi Hayati

doi:10.29240/jsmp.v10i1.16553

Authors

M. Rezeki Muamar Universitas Almuslim, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-900X
Danny Meirawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-5117
Munir Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia , Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4960-4126
Endang Herawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia , Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5616-3714
Rahmi Hayati Universitas Almuslim , Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-6293

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jsmp.v10i1.16553

Keywords:

ADKAR, Management Models, LMS, Lectures

Abstract

The ADKAR change management model was applied to enhance Learning Management System (LMS) adoption at higher education. This study highlights distinct differences between LMS users and non-users across all five stages of the ADKAR model Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement. LMS users exhibited a higher level of Awareness, recognizing the rationale for LMS adoption and its benefits, while non-users showed limited understanding and engagement. In terms of Desire, LMS users demonstrated stronger motivation and a sense of urgency to adopt LMS, compared to non-users who lacked initiative and internal drive. Knowledge gaps were evident, with LMS users possessing better technical skills and problem-solving abilities, whereas non-users required more training and access to resources. Similarly, LMS users demonstrated higher Ability, effectively applying knowledge in practice, whereas non-users struggled due to insufficient practical experience and mentorship. Lastly, in the Reinforcement stage, LMS users benefited from ongoing recognition and support, while non-users lacked sufficient reinforcement mechanisms. The study concludes that targeted interventions, such as personalized training, mentorship, and effective communication, are essential to bridge these gaps and ensure broader LMS adoption across the institution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akwene, G. C. (2024). Adoption of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: A Qualitative Analysis of Enabling Factors. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 12(02), 3229–3237. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i02.el09

Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and opportunities of e-learning implementation in Iraq: A case of public universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 11). Freeman.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Brown, E. K. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Will Africa be ready? 1–3. https://acetforafrica.org/publications/policy-briefs-and-discussion-papers/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-will-africa-be-ready/

Bridges, W. (2009). Managing transitions: Making the most of change. Da Capo Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth). London: Sage.

Cunningham, W. V., & Villaseñor, P. (2016). Employer voices, employer demands, and implications for public skills development policy connecting the labor and education sectors. World Bank Research Observer, 31(1), 102–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkv019

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245

Fullan, M. (2011). Change leader: Learning to do what matters most. John Wiley & Sons.

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes.

Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci.

Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard business press.

Krauter, J. (2023). New Perspectives on Leaders’ Motivational and Emotional Experiences and the Role of Basic Psychological Needs Not to Fail Organizational Change in a Multi-Crisis Context—A Content Analysis. Open Journal of Leadership, 12(03), 258–310. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2023.123014

Lestari, S., & Santoso, A. (2019). The Roles of Digital Literacy, Technology Literacy, and Human Literacy to Encourage Work Readiness of Accounting Education Students in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era. KnE Social Sciences, 3(11), 513. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i11.4031

Malabanan, E. J. R. (2025). Leading the Digital School: Exploring the Relationship between Learning Management System Practices and School Leadership in Senior High Schools. American Journal of Education and Technology, 4(3), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v4i3.5409

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (38th ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muamar, M. R., Nurdin, D., Marwan, M., & Mangkuwinata, S. M. I. (2023). Change management in implementing online learning systems at University in Aceh. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1763-1772.

Neirotti, P., Ricci, A., & Tubiana, M. (2025). Industry 4.0 digital technologies and international performance: The role of family management in Italian firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 294(August 2025), 109765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109765

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations 5th.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.

Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. In World Economic Forum (Vol. 12).

Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (2015). Challenges of implementing E-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1816

Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2020). Learning Management Systems, an overview. In Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_248

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Yenni Arnas, Andy Ahmad, & Fajarianto, O. (2023). The Effectiveness of Learning Management System in Higher Education: A Case Study of Social Sciences Course Content. IJESS International Journal of Education and Social Science, 4(2), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.56371/ijess.v4i2.185