Audience Decoding Position on the Use of Language and Humor in Gus Miftah's Lectures

Authors

  • Sitti Hamsiyah Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Alauddin Makassar , Indonesia
  • Firdaus Muhammad Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Alauddin Makassar , Indonesia
  • St. Nasriah Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Alauddin Makassar , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jdk.v11i1.16385

Keywords:

Decoding, Language, Humorous Lectures, Gus Miftah.

Abstract

Purpose − The high average screen time and number of TikTok users in Indonesia indicate a change in the communication patterns of society. Da'wah practices in the contemporary era have also evolved. Da'wah is now delivered through digital access. The context of digital da'wah in the contemporary era requires not only visual beauty, but also the right strategy. This study departs from the strategy of using language and humor in da'wah, which is still a matter of debate, because not all circles accept the use of humor in da'wah in the same way. Gus Miftah is one of the preachers who receives mixed responses from his audience because of the language and humor he uses in his speech.This study aims to examine the audience's response to the use of language and humor in Gus Miftah's preaching, as well as the meanings that emerge from the audience's response to the language and humor in Gus Miftah's preaching.

Method − This research is a descriptive qualitative study using an audience reception approach. The reception approach refers to the understanding that the dynamics of message reception cannot be understood solely through the process of message production and delivery, but also through how the audience receives, understands, interprets, and negotiates the meaning of the message.

Findings − The results of the study show that based on the classification using Stuart Hall's reception model, the dominance of audience comments was in the opposition position, followed by the dominant hegemony position, and opposition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldiansyah, M. A. (2024). Variasi Bahasa Makian dalam Konsep Interaksi Dakwah Gus Muhammad Iqdam : Kajian Sosiolinguistik. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(2), 1952–1963.

Damayanti, T. (2025). Pesan Komunikasi Edukasi pada Iklan di Youtube dan Resepsi Khalayak. Penerbit Adab.

Hidayat, M. (2024). Kontroversi Gus Miftah, Antara Candaan Kepada Seorang Penjual Es Teh, Begini Contoh Komentar Netizen. Koranlinggaupos.Id. https://linggaupos.bacakoran.co/read/23434/kontroversi-gus-miftah-antara-candaan-kepada-seorang-penjual-es-teh-begini-contoh-komentar-netizen

Khoiruz Zaman, W. (2025). Manajemen Media Dakwah Kontemporer Strategi, Inovasi, dan Roadmap Era Digital (I. Hidayati (ed.)). Revormasi.

Madakir. (2024). Model Implementasi Pendidikan Multikultural Abdurrahman Wahid. Harmoni Press.

Maheswara, R. (2025). Indonesia masih Jadi Negara Pengguna TikTok Terbanyak di Dunia pada Oktober 2025. Dataloka. https://dataloka.id/humaniora/5190/indonesia-masih-jadi-negara-pengguna-tiktok-terbanyak-di-dunia-pada-oktober-2025/

Muhammad Ridwan. (2024). ETIKA HUMOR DALAM DAKWAH : ANALISIS KONTROVERSI. Mumtaz Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan KeIslaman, 8(02), 280–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v8i2

Murtadlo, A. (2025). Menelusuri Pemikiran Progresif Tokoh Dakwah Nasional. Madani Kreatif Publisher.

Patma, O. F., Prihatin, S. D., Informasi, M., Pascasarjana, S., Mada, U. G., Jl, Y., & Utara, T. (2025). Analisis Resepsi Stuart Hall Tentang Poster Silang Pinjam Antar Perpustakaan Sepatu Jolifa. Abdi Pustaka: Jurnal Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan, 5(1), 52–65.

Prasetyo, A. (2025). Etika Dakwah Dalam Polemik Gus Miftah Dan Penjual Es Teh: Analisis Perspektif Moral Dan Sosial. Hikmah Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Islam, 19(01), 275–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24952/hik.v19i2.17057

Putra, Robby Aditya, et al. "Commodifying learning? Ethical communication violations and professional boundaries of Indonesian influencer lecturers on social media." Indonesian Journal of Educational Management and Leadership 4.1 (2026): 64-89.

Putra, Robby Aditya, Exsan Adde, and Maulida Fitri. "Media dakwah TikTok untuk generasi Z." Ath-Thariq: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi 7.1 (2023): 58-71.

R. Gallagher John. (2024). Case Study Research in the Digital Age. Routledge.

Riskiy, S. R., & Hapsari, R. (2022). INTERPRETASI MASKULINITAS PADA IKLAN SKINCARE PRIA ( Studi Resepsi Stuart Hall pada Khalayak Pria ). BroadComm, 4(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53856/bcomm.v4i1.234

Romadoni, A. (2025). Menko PMK: Screen Time Orang RI Capai 7,5 Jam Per Hari, Bikin Berpikir Pendek. KumparanNews. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/menko-pmk-screen-time-orang-ri-capai-7-5-jam-per-hari-bikin-berpikir-pendek-25HdJwer8Ed/full

Vera, N. (2024). Analisis Resepsi: Metode Riset Khalayak Media. Deepublish Digital.

Wahid, U. (2024). Facebook: Ruang Perdebatan Kebijakan Pemerintah. Indigo Media.

Yusuf, M., & Kasman, S. (2025). Humor Dalam Pesan Dakwah Humor in Preaching Messages. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(1), 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i1.7176

Downloads

Published

10-05-2026

How to Cite

Hamsiyah, S., Muhammad, F., & Nasriah, S. (2026). Audience Decoding Position on the Use of Language and Humor in Gus Miftah’s Lectures. Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 11(1), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.29240/jdk.v11i1.16385

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check