Urgensi Zoologi Sastra Alquran: Studi Kasus Pada Seni Kisah Zoomorfik Al-Farasy Surat Al-Qari’ah

Muhamad Agus Mushodiq, Ibnu Burdah, Suja'i Suja'i, Mispani Mispani, Habib Shulton Asnawi

Abstract


The Urgency of Qur’anic Literary Zoology: A Case Study on the Art of the Zoomorphic Story of Al-Farasy in Surah Al-Qari'ah

The criminalization of animals can be manifested in concrete actions and disproportionate interpretation of religious texts. This paper aims to describe the urgency of a literary zoological perspective on animal studies in the Quran and provide examples of its application in analyzing one of the cases of animal criminalization al-Farasy in Surat Al-Qari'ah. The author uses qualitative research methods with descriptive-interpretive analysis. The author uses the theory of Tasybih and Roland Barthes’s Semiotics theory with a literary zoological approach. The results of this paper are: First, literary zoology is essential for animal research in the Quran for several reasons. They are  (1) animals in the Quran are included in the literary category, so that an important literary approach is presented to find the meaning behind the existential of animals in the Quran, (2) ) Literary zoology is interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary. Based on these characteristics, the zoosembiology between literature and animals can be expressed comprehensively and holistically, (3) literary zoological opposes anthropocentric philosophy, which is alleged to have produced many actions that destroy nature. Nature conservation, especially related to the future of animals, needs to be encouraged in the current era. Second, the discrimination against al-Farasy by the ulama resulted in monodisciplinary studies. Al-Farsy as an example of humans when the Day of Judgment comes is not meant for taqbih halihi (humiliating the human condition when the Day of Judgment comes), but rather for bayanu halihi and taqriru halihi (reporting the situation)


Keywords


Literary Zoological; Zoomorphic; Roland Barthes's Semiotics Theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd Rahman bint Syati’, ’Aisyah. Al-Qur’an Wa Qadaya al-Insan. Qahirah: Dar Al-Ma’arif, n.d.

Abdurrahman, Soejono. Metode Penelitian: Suatu Pemikiran Dan Penerapan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2005.

Abi Bakr Al-Qurthuby, Abi Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn. Al-Jami’u Li Ahkami Al-Qur’an. Beirut: Muassasah Ar-Risalah, 2006.

Al-Arfi, Sa’ad Abd Rahman. Suluku Al-Hayawan Fi Asy-SYi’ri al-Jahily: Dirasah Fi al-Madmun Wa An-Nasij al-Fanniy. Mamlakah Arabiyah Su’udiyah: Jami’ah Ummul Qura’, 2005.

Al-Hasyimi, Ahmad. Jawahiru Al-Balaghah. Beirut: Al-Maktabah Al-’Asriyyah, n.d.

Al-Khittaby, Ibu Sulaiman Hamad ibn Muhammad ibn Ibrahim, Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn Isa Ar-Rumany, and ’Abd Qahir Al-Jurjany. Tsalatsu Rasail Fi I’Jaz Al-Quran. Misra: Dar Ma’arif, n.d.

Al-Khuly, Amin. Manahij Tajdid Fi An-Nahwi Wa al-Balaghah Wa at-Tafsir Wa al-Adab. Misra: Maktabah al-Usrah, 2003.

Allen, Barbara. Animals in Religion: Devotion, Symbol and Ritual. Reaktion Books, 2016.

Al-Mahally, Imam Jalaluddin, and Imam Jalaluddin Asy-Syuyuti. Tafsir Jalalain. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1992.

Al-Samarqandy, Alauddin. Tuhfatu Al-Fuqaha’. Beirut: Dar Al Kotob Al Ilmiyah, n.d.

Abd Halim, “Dialektika Hadis Nabi Dengan Budaya Lokal Arab | Halim | DINIKA : Academic Journal of Islamic Studies.” Accessed January 4, 2021. https://ejournal.iainsurakarta.ac.id/index.php/dinika/article/view/2060

Az-Zamakhsari Al-Khawarizmy, Mahmud ibn Umar. Tafsir Al-Kasyyaf. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 2009.

Bahr Al-Jahiz, Abi Usman Amru ibnu. Kitabu Al-Hayawan, 1965.

Barthes, Roland. Elemen-Elemen Semiologi. Yogyakarta: BASABASI, 2017.

Bittman, Mark. “Who Protects the Animals?” Opinionator (blog), April 26, 2011. https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/26/who-protects-the-animals/.

Blankinship, Kevin. “Suffering the Sons of Eve: Animal Ethics in al-Maʿarrī’s Epistle of the Horse and the Mule.” Religions 11, no. 8 (August 10, 2020): 412. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11080412.

Boullata, Issa J. Al-Qur’an Yang Menakjubkan. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2008.

Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE, 2014.

Dzaif, Syauqi. Tarikh Al-Adab al-Araby: Al-Asr al-Islamy. Misra: Dar Al-Ma’arif, 1963.

Endraswara, Suwardi. Metodologi Penelitian Zoologi Sastra. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2019.

Foltz, Richard. Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures. Simon and Schuster, 2014.

Hitami, Munzir. Pengantar Studi Al-Qur’an: Teori dan Pendekatan. Lkis Pelangi Aksara, n.d.

Ibn Abdu as-Salam al-Sulamy, Muhammad Izzuddin Abd al-Aziz. Qawaidu Al-Ahkam Fi Masalihi al-Anam. Qahirah: Maktabah Kulliyat al-Azhar, 1991.

Janaby, Mat’ab Asil al-. “Al-Hayawan Fi Al-Qur’an-Dirasah Simiyaiyyah.” Lark Journal For Philosophy , Linguistics And Social Sciences 1, no. 22 (2016). https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/122513.

Jarim, Aly, and Musthafa Amin. Al-Balaghah Al-Wadihah. Qahirah: Dar Al-Ma’arif, n.d.

Landis-Marinello, Kyle H. “The Environmental Effects of Cruelty to Agricultural Animals” 106 (n.d.): 5.

Mandzur, Ibnu. Lisan Al-Arab. Vol. 14. Beirut: Dar Sadir, tanpa tahun.

Mangunjaya, Fachruddin M. Konservasi Alam Dalam Islam. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2019.

Maraghi, Musthafa al-. Tafsir Al-Maraghi. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1993.

Muhammad ibn Musa ad-Dimairy, Kamaluddin. Hayatu Al-Hayawan al-Kubra. Damaskus: Daru Talasn, 1992.

Mushodiq, Muhamad Agus. “Representamen Cinta Dalam Kisah Nabi Sulaiman Dan Ratu Saba’ Surat An-Naml (Studi Analisis Semiotika Dan Komunikasi Interpersonal).” Al-Tsaqafa : Jurnal Ilmiah Peradaban Islam 15, no. 2 (2018): 243–57. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-tsaqafa.v15i2.3826.

Nanay, Bence. “Zoomorphism.” Erkenntnis, December 19, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0099-0.

Nurwahdi -. “Style Tasybih dalam Al-Quran.” Majalah Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Pemikiran Keagamaan Tajdid 16, no. 2 (2013): 253–72. https://doi.org/10.15548/tajdid.v16i2.100.

Nutting, W. L. “Colonizing Flights and Associated Activities of Termites. I. The Desert Damp-Wood Termite Paraneotermes Simplicicornis (Kalotermitidae).” Psyche. Hindawi, 1966. https://doi.org/10.1155/1966/59080.

Ortiz-Robles, Mario. Literature and Animal Studies. Routledge, 2016.

Othman, Mohd Sukki, and Zulkifli Mohd Yusoff. “Perumpamaan Serangga Dalam Al-Qur’an: Analisis I’jaz.” QURANICA - International Journal of Quranic Research 2, no. 1 (June 1, 2012): 104–29.

Owens, Avalon C. S., and Sara M. Lewis. “The Impact of Artificial Light at Night on Nocturnal Insects: A Review and Synthesis.” Ecology and Evolution 8, no. 22 (October 23, 2018): 11337–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4557.

Pradopo, Rachmat Djoko. Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik, Dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.

Quthb, Sayyid. Tafsir Fi Zilali Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2000.

Ragib Muhammad an-Najar, Ragib. Min Ayat Al-I’Jaz al-Ilmy: Al-Hayawan Fi al-Quran al-Karim. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 2006.

Rochani, Ida. Fiksi Populer Teori & Metode Kajian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.

Scanes, Colin G., and Pu Chengzhong. Animals and Human Society: Animals and Religion, Belief Systems, Symbolism and Myth. United Kingdom: Sara Teney Elsevier, 2018.

Schochet, Elijah Judah. Animal Life in Jewish Tradition: Attitudes and Relationships. (New York: Ktav Publishing House, 1984.

Sodiqin, Ali. Antropologi Al-Quran, Model Dialektika Wahyu Dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Arruz Media Grup, 2008.

Somers-Yeates, Robin, David Hodgson, Peter K. McGregor, Adrian Spalding, and Richard H. ffrench-Constant. “Shedding Light on Moths: Shorter Wavelengths Attract Noctuids More than Geometrids.” Biology Letters 9, no. 4 (August 23, 2013): 20130376. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0376.

Supriyanto, Asep. Serangga Dalam Al-Qur’an (Kajian Tafsir Dengan Pendekatan Hermeneutika Muhammad ‘Abid Al-Jabiri). Thesis. Yogyakarta: Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2016.

Tabary, Abu Ja’far Nuhammad ibn Jarir at-. Tafsir At-Tabary Min Kitabihi Jami’il Bayan ’An Ta’wili Ay al-Qur’an. Vol. 6. Beirut: Muassasah ar-Risalah, 1994.

Tlili, Sarra. Animals in the Qur’an. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Vitale Shreve, Kristyn R., Lindsay R. Mehrkam, and Monique A. R. Udell. “Social Interaction, Food, Scent or Toys? A Formal Assessment of Domestic Pet and Shelter Cat (Felis Silvestris Catus) Preferences.” Behavioural Processes, Feline Behavior & Cognition, 141 (August 1, 2017): 322–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.03.016.

Winarno, Gunardi Djoko, and Sugeng P. Harianto. Perilaku Satwa Liar (Ethology). Bandar Lampung: Aura, 2018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v5i1.2291

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Muhamad Agus Mushodiq, Suja'i Suja'i, Mispani Mispani, Habib Shulton Asnawi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

INDEXED BY:

CrossrefMorarefGoogle ScholarDimensionsIndonesia One SearchAcademia.Edu



free web stats Al Quds's Visitors
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.