Wacana Keadilan Shahabat Dalam Pandangan Ulama Klasik Dan Kontemporer

Authors

  • Lailiyatun Nafisah IAIN KUDUS, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Muhtador Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kudus, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v2i2.429

Keywords:

Islamic dogma, 'adalah, sahaba, sunni

Abstract

The writing explains the discourse of classical and contemporary scholars regarding friend justice, as something urgent in the narration of hadith. Argumentatively-dogmative this paper constructs the justice of friends in the classical ulama perspective, as well as the argumentative-dogmatic of contemporary scholars regarding friend justice in the narrative of the hadith as a comparison. This study is literary in nature which refers to qualitative methods that collect data from various Islamic literature that are considered to have relevance. So that it can be concluded that the religious scholars of the past had a friend's belief that they were just people guaranteed by the Prophet as human beings in their time, the Sunni argument was contradicted by contemporary scholars

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnan, Adnan. “Reformulasi Wacana Keadilan Sahabat.†Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis 1, no. 1 (2016): 1–6. doi:10.15575/diroyah.v1i1.2049.

Al-Bukhari, Abi Abdillah Muhammad bin Ismail. Al-Jami’ Al-Shahih. Mesir: Maktabah Salafiyah, 1403.

Al-Naisabury, Muslim ibn Hujjaj Al-Qusyri. Shahih Muslim. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyah, n.d.

Al-Quddus. Al-Qur’an Tarjamah. Kudus: Mubarokatan Toyyibatan, n.d.

Asror, Miftahul, and Imam Musbikin. Membedah Hadits Nabi SAW,. Yogyakarta: Jaya Star Nine, 2015.

Fadlilah, Nur. “Keadilan Sahabat Nabi Dalam Perspektif Fuad Jabali.†Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith 2, no. 1 (2012): 110–27. doi:10.15642/mutawatir.2012.2.1.110-127.

Farida, Umma. Paradigma Periwayatan Dan Kritik Matan Hadis Perspektif Jamal Al- Banna. Yogyakarta: Idea Press, 2009.

Hidayat, Salamah Noor. Kritik Teks Hadis: Analisis Tentang Ar- Riwayah Bil Makna Dan Implikasinya Bagi Kualitas Hadis. Yogyakarta: Teras, 2009.

Imran, Muhammad. “Sahabat Nabi saw Dalam Perspektif Sunni dan Syi’ah (Pengaruhnya Pada Kesahihan Hadis).†Aqlam: Journal of Islam and Plurality 1, no. 1 (2016): 15–34.

Munawir, Ahmad Warson. Al-Munawir: Kamus Arab-Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Progresif, 1984.

Shiddiqy, M. Hasby ash. Pokok- Pokok Ilmu Dirayah Hadits. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1994.

———. Sejarah Dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadis. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra, 2002.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian al-Qur’an. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2009.

Sochimin, Sochimin. “Telaah Pemikiran Hadis Mahmud Abu Rayyah Dalam Buku “Adwa’ ‘Ala Al-Sunnah Al-Muhammadiyahâ€.†HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika 9, no. 2 (2012). doi:10.24239/jsi.v9i2.77.271-300.

Tangngareng, Tasmin. “Telaah Historis Terhadap Keadilan Sahabat.†AL-FIKR: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 14, no. 3 (2010): 447–60.

Yaqub, Ali Mustafa. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1996.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-23

How to Cite

Nafisah, L., & Muhtador, M. (2018). Wacana Keadilan Shahabat Dalam Pandangan Ulama Klasik Dan Kontemporer. AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis, 2(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v2i2.429

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).