I'adah al-Nadzr (Reconsideration): A Critical Comparative Study between Indonesian Law and Saudi Arabian Law Perspectives (Fiqh Murafa’at)

Islamul Haq; Muliati Muliati; Muhammad Majdy Amiruddin; Nur Misyuari Maddolangeng; Hamza Abed Al Karim Hammad

doi:10.29240/jhi.v7i2.5248

I'adah al-Nadzr (Reconsideration): A Critical Comparative Study between Indonesian Law and Saudi Arabian Law Perspectives (Fiqh Murafa’at)

Islamul Haq, Muliati Muliati, Muhammad Majdy Amiruddin, Nur Misyuari Maddolangeng, Hamza Abed Al Karim Hammad

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the murafa’at fiqh (Saudi Arabian Law) and the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code's perspectives on a convict's plea for i’adah al-nadzr (reconsideration). This was a normative juridical inquiry, which entailed poring over relevant material to gather data, assess content, and draw similarities between positive law and Islamic criminal law. The findings of this study indicated that review in positive law, referred to in Saudi Arabia's murafa’at fiqh as i’adah al-nadzr/al-muhakamah, attempted to ensure legal justice and judge justice in their rulings. There were parallels between positive law and murafa’at fiqh in terms of the justifications for filing reconsideration. There were, however, distinctions regarding the giyabi case as a basis for submitting reconsideration. In Saudi Arabia's murafa’at fiqh, the reconsideration application in the giyaby case could be accepted, although positive law did not cite the giyaby ruling as a reason to seek reconsideration. Positive law, on the other hand, provides for the possibility of resistance (verzet) if the defendant was not present in court and has not protested Verstek's ruling. Another parallel between positive law and Saudi fiqh murafa’at was seen in the reconsideration application regulations, which prohibited suspending the execution of rulings. However, the researcher notes that this rule cannot be applied universally.

Keywords

Reconsideration; murafa’at fiqh; positive law

Full Text:

PDF

References

’Abd al-Karim Zaydan, Nizam Al Qada’ Fi Al Syariaat Al Islamiyah (Amman: Maktabah al Batsair, 1989)

Abdelaal, Mohamed A, ‘Taqlid v. Ijtihad: The Rise of Taqlid as the Secondary Judicial Approach in Islamic Jurisprudence’, J. Juris, 14 (2012), 151

Abdul, Manan, ‘Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama’ (Kencana, Jakarta, 2006)

Ad-Dardir, Imam Ahmad, ‘Hasyiah Ad-Dasuqiala as-Syarh Al Kabir’ (Isa Al babi Al Halbi, 2015)

Al-Ansari, A, ‘Asna Al-Matalib Fi Sharh RawdhulTalib’, Beirut: DarulKitab Al-Islami, 2013

Al-Syafi’i, Abdullah Muhammad Idris, Al-Umm (Dar al-Kotob al-Ilmiyah, 2002)

Basuni, muhammad syarif, Al Wasaiq Al Wauliyah Al Mu’niya Bi Huquq Al Insan (Kairo: Dar Syuruq, 2003)

Chakim, M Lutfi, ‘Mewujudkan Keadilan Melalui Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi’, Jurnal Konstitusi, 12.2 (2016), 328–52

Gumbira, Seno Wibowo, ‘Problematika Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pasca SEMA RI No. 7 Tahun 2014 (Suatu Analisa Yuridis Dan Asas-Asas Dalam Hukum Peradilan Pidana)’, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 46.1 (2016), 106–19

Gunarto, Marcus Priyo, ‘Mengembalikan Pelaksanaan Peninjauan Kembali Sesuai Asas Hukum’, 2004

———, ‘Mengembalikan Pelaksanaan Peninjauan Kembali Sesuai Asas Hukum’, Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 21.3 (2009), 462–76

Hadrawi, Abd, ‘Visi Fiqih Jinayah Islam Tentang Rechterlijk Dwaling Dalam Hukum Pidana Positif’ (IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 1988)

Hakim, Dedi Rahman, ‘Prinsip Kepastian Hukumdalam Pembatasan Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali’, Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 16.1 (2018), 31–49

Halim, Yoefanca, and Hardy Salim, ‘Keabsahan Putusan Pengadilan Yang Belum Inkracht Sebagai Novum Dalam Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali’, Jurnal Suara Hukum, 2.1 (2020), 86–104

Imrani, Al, Al Bayan Fi Mazhab Imam Al Syafi’i (Dar al Minhaj li Attibaah wa al Tauzi)

Kasani, Abu Bakr al, ‘Badai’al-Shanai’fi Tartib Al-Syarai’’, Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyah, t. Th

Liba, Muhammad, ‘Al Tha’n Bi Iltimas I’adah Al Nadhr Fi Nidham Al Murafaat Al Syariah Al Saudi’, Egyptia Journal, 35.1 (2020), 998-1–73

Lindsay, Steven J, ‘Timing Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations in Chevron’s Shadow’, Yale LJ, 127 (2017), 2448

Loreta Capeheart, Dragan Milovanovic, Social Justice, Theories, Issues and Movement (Rutgers University Press, 2007)

Lucy, William, ‘Access to Justice and the Rule of Law’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40.2 (2020), 377–402

‘Mahakim Al Isti’naf Al Idariyyah’, Wikipedia

Meirison, Meirison, Desmadi Saharuddin, and Rosdialena Rosdialena, ‘Takhrij Fikih Dan Permasalahan Kontemporer’, Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5.1 (2020), 51–70

bin Nujaim, Zainuddin, Al-Bahru Ar-Raiq Syarah Kanzu Ad-Daqaiq (Beirut: Dar al-Marifah, tt)

Rustanto, ‘Analisis Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Putusan Pengadilan Yang Telah Memperoleh Kekuatan Hukum Tetap Oleh Jaksa Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia’, Tesis, 2011, 6

Selznick, Philip, Law, Society, and Industrial Justice (Quid Pro Books, 2020), xxx

Soedirjo, Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Pidana (Jakarta: CV. Akademika Pressindo, 1986)

Soeparman, Parman, Pengaturan Hak Mengajukan Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Pidana Bagi Korban Kejahatan (Refika Aditama, 2007)

Tahir, Hadari Djenawi, Bab Tentang Herziening Didalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Alumni, 1982)

Tatuhas, Pricylia Eunike, ‘Alasan Mengajukan Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Praktek Pradilan Pidana’, Lex Crimen, 8.9 (2020)

Yahya, Harahap M, ‘Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi Dan Peninjauan Kembali’ (Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2005)

Yilmaz, Ihsan, ‘Ijtihad and Tajdid by Conduct’, MH Yavuz, & J. Esposito, Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gèulen Movement. Syracuse University Press, 2003

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i2.5248