The Majelis Ulama’s Fatwa on Freedom of Expression On Social Media: The Perspective of Maqashid Sharia

Authors

  • Danil Putra Arisandy Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Asmuni Asmuni Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i2.5235

Keywords:

Fatwa, maqashid sharia, freedom of expression, social media

Abstract

This article criticizes MUI Fatwa Number 24 of 2017 concerning guidelines for naming through social media, wherein the decision of its legal provisions the fatwa has given many restrictions that can be understood as an effort to close the space for freedom of expression and opinion on social media, the impact of which social media users feel afraid and restrained to views. The existence of this fatwa is fundamental because it provides clues regarding the rights of free speech for social media users from an Islamic perspective. This paper uses Jasser Auda's maqasheed sharia approach, namely system theory, as a normative analysis in criticizing fatwas against the interpretation of ghibah behavior, the concept of tabayyun, the public domain in the torso of the general provisions of fatwas. This article argues that the performance of the behavior of the ghibah, the concept of tabayyun, the public domain, in the general conditions of the fatwa body is very influential in the understanding of Islamic law itself towards a direction that is contrary to the purpose of maqasheed sharia, namely the law for the benefit of the people. This is because the interpretation of the fatwa is not ideal for realizing the goal of protecting the human right to opinion for social media users in a country that applies the concept of democracy. This argument is based on the researchers' reading of the MUI Fatwa using a system theory that says the purpose of the law is to achieve the universal benefit, which is inseparable from all points of view of Islamic law. In the end, this article concludes that there is a need to reconstruct the interpretation of the ghibah concept of tabayun, the public domain in the Majelis Ulama’s fatwa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditya, R. “Pengaruh Media Sosial Instagram Terhadap Minat Fotografi Pada Komunitas Fotografi Pekanbaru.†Jurnal Fisip 2 (2015): 1–14.

Al-Kandari, Ali A., and Ali Dashti. “Fatwa and the Internet: A Study of the Influence of Muslim Religious Scholars on Internet Diffusion in Saudi Arabia.†Prometheus 32, no. 2 (April 3, 2014): 127–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2014.998929.

Amin, Ma’ruf. Fatwa Dalam Sistem Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Elsas, 2008.

Amiruddin, Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2004.

Anggraini, Anggi Ratna, and J. Oliver. “Eksistensi Fatwa MUI Nomor 24 Tahun 2017 Sebagai Pedoman Dalam Penggunaan Media Sosial Bagi Masyarakat Islam.†Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53, no. 9 (2019): 1689–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shariah As Philosophy Of Islamic Law: A System Approach. London: The Internasional Institute of Islamic Thought, 2007.

———. Membumikan Hukum Islam Melalui Maqasid Syariah. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka, 2015.

Azhar, Ahmad Faizal, and Eko Soponyono. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Pengaturan Dan Penanggulangan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) Di Media Sosial.†Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 2 (2020): 275–90. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.275-290.

Bakar, Al Yasa Abu. Ahli Waris Sepertalian Darah: Kajian Perbandingan Terhadap Penalaran Hazairin Dan Penalaran Fikih Mazhab. Jakarta: INIS, 1998.

———. “Metode Istinbath Fiqih Di Indonesia (Kasus-Kasus Majelis Muzakarah Al-Azhar).†IAIN Sunan Kalijaga, 1987.

Caeiro, Alexandre. “The Making of the Fatwa: The Production of Islamic Legal Expertise in Europe.†Archives de Sciences Sociales Des Religions 56, no. 155 (February 4, 2011): 81–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41239676.

“Dua Tahun Terakhir, Demokrasi Indonesia Alami Penurunan – Universitas Padjadjaran.†Accessed October 11, 2022. https://www.unpad.ac.id/2022/01/dua-tahun-terakhir-demokrasi-indonesia-alami-penurunan/.

“Fenomena “No Viral No Justice", Ini 4 Kasus Yang Baru Ditangani Polisi Setelah Viral Di Medsos.†Accessed October 11, 2022. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/12/17/17514801/fenomena-no-viral-no-justice-ini-4-kasus-yang-baru-ditangani-polisi-setelah.

Getcraft.id. “10 Media Digital Top Indonesia Yang Populer Di Mata Pembaca,†2020. https://crafters.getcraft.com/id-articles/10-media-digital-top-indonesia-yang-populer-di-mata-pembaca.

Gunara, Thorik. Komunikasi Rasulullah: Indahnya Berkomunikasi Ala Rasulullah. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media, 2009.

Haddade, Abdul Wahid. Kode Etik Berfatwa;Merumuskan Format Ideal Fatwa Keagamaan. Makasar: Alauddin University Press, 2013.

Harahap, Ikhwanuddin. “Pendekatan Al-Maslahah.†Yurisprudentia; Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 2017, 47–65.

Hasyim, Syafiq. “Fatwas and Democracy: Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Indonesian Ulema Council) and Rising Conservatism in Indonesian Islam.†TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 8, no. 1 (May 8, 2020): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.13.

Houghton, David, Andrew Pressey, and Doga Istanbulluoglu. “Who Needs Social Networking? An Empirical Enquiry into the Capability of Facebook to Meet Human Needs and Satisfaction with Life.†Computers in Human Behavior 104 (March 2020): 106153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.029.

Indonesia. Keputusan Bersama Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia, Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Negara kesatuan Republik Indonesia Tentang Pedoman Implementasi Atas Pasal Tertentu Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang , Pub. L. No. Nomor 229 Tahun 2021, Nomor 154 Tahun 2021, Nomor KB/2/VI/2021 (2021).

Indonesia, Republik. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.†Jakarta, 2008.

“Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informatika.†Accessed October 6, 2022. https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/9829/mui-keluarkan-fatwa-bermuamalah-di-media-sosial/0/sorotan_media.

“Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informatika.†Accessed October 6, 2022. https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/9870/pemerintah-akan-bantu-sosialisasi-fatwa-mui-soal-penggunaan-medsos/0/sorotan_media.

Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Fatwa MUI Nomor 24 Tahun 2017 Tentang Hukum dan Pedoman Bermuamalah Melalui Media Sosial, Pub. L. No. 24 Tahun 2017, 1 (2017).

Masud, Muhammad Khalid. “The Significance of IstiftÄ’ in the FatwÄ Discourse.†Islamic Studies 48, no. 3 (February 4, 2009): 341–66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20839171.

Mawaza, Jayyidan Falakhi, and Abdussatar Khalil. “Masalah Sosial Dan Kebijakan Publik Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus UU ITE No. 19 Tahun 2016).†Journal of Governance Innovation 2, no. 1 (2020): 22–31. https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v2i1.386.

Mukhlishin, Ahmad, Aan Suhendri, and Muhammad Dimyati. “Metode Penetapan Hukum Dalam Berfatwa.†Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (December 29, 2018): 167. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v3i2.444.

Mun’im, Zainul. “The Epistemology of MUI’s Fatwas on Covid-19: Bayani and Burhani Eclecticism.†Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (May 30, 2022): 1. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.3216.

Nasution, Muhammad Syukri Albani, and Rahmat Hidayat Nasution. Filsafat Hukum & Maqashid Syariah. Prenada Media, 2020.

Oktalita, Frina, and Darlin Rizki. “Analysis of MUI Fatwa Number 17 of 2020 Regarding Kaifiat Prayer Guidelines for Health Workers Who Wear Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) When Treating and Handling Covid-19 Patients.†Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (November 11, 2021): 247. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v6i2.3332.

Pers, Dewan. “Pedoman Pemberitaan Media Siber.†Jakarta, 2012.

Reivich, K dan Shaltc. The Reselience Faktor. New York: Broadway, 2003.

Resky, Muhammad, and Zulhas’ari Mustafa. “Hate Speech Di Media Sosial Dalam Tinjauan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) Nomor 24 Tahun 2017.†Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum, January 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24252/SHAUTUNA.V1I1.12423.

SAFEnet. “Kasus – SAFEnet.†Accessed June 24, 2020. https://id.safenet.or.id/category/kasus/.

———. Kasus Iss – SAFEnet (n.d.).

Satriani, Indra. “Eksistensi Fatwa MUI No. 24 Tahun 2017 Sebagai Pedoman Dalam Penggunaan Media Sosial Bagi Masyarakat Islam.†Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan 18, no. 1 (April 6, 2020): 129–48. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/tapalkuda/index.php/qodiri/article/view/3691.

Shetret, Liat. “Use of the Internet for Counter-Terrorist Purposes.†Global Center on Cooperative Security, February 4, 2011. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20358.

Shihab, M. Quraish. “Tafsir Al-Misbah.†Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

Sutopo, Umarwan. “Dialektika Fatwa Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia: Meneguhkan Urgensi Dan Posisi Fatwa Di Masyarakat Muslim Nusantara.†Justicia Islamica 15, no. 1 (December 29, 2018): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v15i1.1435.

Syamsudin, M. Operasional Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Syifa Amin Widigdo, Mohammad, and Homaidi Hamid. “The Power of FatwÄ in Indonesia: An Analysis of MUI’s Controversial FatwÄs.†Afkaruna 14, no. 2 (2018): 146–66. https://doi.org/10.18196/aiijis.2018.0085.146-165.

Wulandari, Fajrina Eka. “Hate Speech Dalam Pandangan UU ITE Dan Fatwa MUI.†Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 2017. https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2017.5.2.251-271.

———. “Hate Speech Dalam Pandangan UU ITE Dan Fatwa MUI.†Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (November 1, 2017). https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2017.5.2.251-271.

Downloads

Published

01-12-2022

How to Cite

Arisandy, D. P., Asmuni, A., & Albani Nasution, M. S. (2022). The Majelis Ulama’s Fatwa on Freedom of Expression On Social Media: The Perspective of Maqashid Sharia. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(2 November), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i2.5235

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)